Complaints
This profile includes complaints for Marcus by Goldman Sachs's headquarters and its corporate-owned locations. To view all corporate locations, see
Customer Complaints Summary
- 1,697 total complaints in the last 3 years.
- 605 complaints closed in the last 12 months.
If you've experienced an issue
Submit a ComplaintThe complaint text that is displayed might not represent all complaints filed with BBB. Some consumers may elect to not publish the details of their complaints, some complaints may not meet BBB's standards for publication, or BBB may display a portion of complaints when a high volume is received for a particular business.
Initial Complaint
Date:08/29/2023
Type:Billing IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
Account name: GS BANK USA GENERALMOTORS
Amount : $9016 Date Opened : 3/11/2023 Account # ****************
According to 15 USC 168i(15) the credit bureaus have to modify or delete accounts and Inquires that are not reporting accurately.
According to 15 USC 1681b(1) the credit bureaus don’t have no written permission
According to 15 USC 1681 have the right to privacy
According to 15 USC 168s-2 A person shall not furnish any information relating to a consumer to any consumer reporting agency if the person knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the information is inaccurate .
(B) Reporting information after notice and confirmation of errors
According to 15 USC 1681 I have the right to privacy
According to 15 USC 1681s-2 A person shall not furnish any information relating to a consumer to any any consumer reporting agency if the person knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the information is inaccurate.
(B) Reporting Information after notice and confirmation of errors
A person shall not furnish information relating to a consumer to any consumer reporting agency
(i) The person has been notified by the consumer, at the address specified by the person for such
Notices, that specifies information inaccurate, and
(ii) the information is, in, fact, inaccurate.
The credit bureaus have no respect for the laws.
Someone needs to hold them accountable for this.Business Response
Date: 09/01/2023
Goldman
Sachs Bank USA (the “Bank”) received the above-referenced complaint related to
the GM Card via the Better Business Bureau (“BBB”) Complaint Portal on August
29, 2023. We appreciate the opportunity to address the concerns raised by *****
********* (the “Customer”) related to a fraudulent account.
The Bank conducted an investigation and confirmed an account was booked on March 11, 2023. The account is currently under review. The Bank requires
additional time to complete the investigation and will respond to the Customer
within 10-days. If the Customer has any additional questions or concerns, the
Bank is available by phone at ###-###-####.
Based
on the above details, we kindly request this complaint to be closed.Initial Complaint
Date:08/28/2023
Type:Billing IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
I am not liable for the debt with GS Bank USA - General Motor, I do not have a contract with Marcus by Goldman Sachs, they did not provide me with the original contract as i requested.Business Response
Date: 09/01/2023
Goldman
Sachs Bank USA (the “Bank”) received the above-referenced complaint related to
the GM Card via the Better Business Bureau (“BBB”) Complaint Portal on August
28, 2023. We appreciate the opportunity to address the concerns raised by ****
****** (the “Customer”) related to an unauthorized account opening.
The Bank conducted an investigation and confirmed an account was booked on October 8, 2022. The account is currently under review. The Bank requires
additional time to complete the investigation and will respond to the Customer
within 10-days. If the Customer has any additional questions or concerns, the
Bank is available by phone at ###-###-####.
Based
on the above details, we kindly request this complaint to be closed.Initial Complaint
Date:08/26/2023
Type:Billing IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
Marcus by Goldman Sachs is illegally attemting to collect a debt that has been discharged by the United States Bankrupcy Court of the Southern District of texas. They have been notified at a minium of 6 times by the Court or my self that the debt is discharged and I am no longer liable for this debt. The continue to contact my attempting to collect this debt, they continue to report to the credit Agencies that I owe this debt. This is a Violation of the united stated Bankruptcy protection act. I have a ltter from Marcus by Goldman Saches data August 18 2023 that is a clear criminal Act status that I owe them money, I want this collection to stop, I want this removed from every credit agency and I want there accounts updated showing is discharged and no longer owed. Failure to do so will result in a lawsuit. *************Business Response
Date: 09/01/2023
BBB Complaint
******* #******** (Rec’d August 26,
2023)
Marcus
by Goldman Sachs, a brand of Goldman Sachs Bank USA (the “Bank”), received the
above referenced complaint via the Better Business Bureau (“BBB”) Complaint
Portal on August 26, 2023. The Bank appreciates the opportunity to address the
issues raised by ****** ******** ******* (the “Customer”).
The
Bank conducted an investigation into the Customer’s complaint and has confirmed
the Customer's bankruptcy. The Bank will update the Customer’s account status to
reflect as bankruptcy and update the Consumer Reporting Agencies.
Based on the above information, the
Bank kindly requests this complaint to be closed.Initial Complaint
Date:08/25/2023
Type:Billing IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
I am not liable for this debt with ********************** ,they did not provide me with the original contract as I requestedBusiness Response
Date: 08/31/2023
Goldman Sachs Bank *** (the Bank) received the above-referenced complaint related to Apple Card via the Better Business Bureau (BBB)Complaint Portal on August 28, 2023. The Bank appreciates the opportunity to address the concerns raised by ***************************** (the Customer) related to validation of debt.
The Bank conducted an investigation and confirmed no Bank error occurred. The Bank has no record of the Customer requesting a validation of the balance owed prior to August 28, 2023. The Bank sent the Customer documents on August 30, 2023 validating the Customer's debt including a copy of the Apple Card Customer Agreement and statement history showing records of transactions and payments to validate the balance and the debt owed. The Customer is responsible for the balance on the account in the amount of $11,391.68 provided in the latest statement from December 31, 2022. The Bank is unable to provide the Customer with signed documents as the Customer electronically consented to the Apple Card Terms and Conditions by completing the application and opening the account. The Bank is unable to remove the trade line or inquiry from the Customers credit report.
Based on the above details, the Bank kindly requests for this complaint to be closed.Initial Complaint
Date:08/25/2023
Type:Sales and Advertising IssuesStatus:ResolvedMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
I regularly contributed money to my Marcus account over the course of 2 years with no complaint. On June 26, I initiated a relatively large transfer out of the account to contribute towards a down payment on a new house. It initially appeared that the transfer had gone through. However, 2 days later, I received notice that the money had been returned to the bank and the account temporarily locked for security reasons. I can understand the bank's caution and desire to verify that this transfer was indeed initiated by me, the account owner. However, there are no excuses for the atrocious customer service that ensued.
As soon as I found out my account had been locked, I called the service center and provided information (including a secret word) that should identify me as the rightful account owner. However, the bank could not verify my identity and therefore said they would send an affidavit of identity. I waited patiently for over a week before calling to inquire whether or not the affidavit had indeed been sent. I did not receive a clear answer; simply instructions to "call again in 3-4 business days". This routine repeated multiple times until at last, the affidavit arrived on July 19. I immediately had the affidavit notarized and sent back to Marcus. The notarized affidavit was delivered to Marcus on July 24. I called the Marcus service center again on July 28 to confirm receipt of the affidavit of identity and check in on the status of my account. Once again, I was advised to call back in 3-4 business days...
It's now August 25, 2 months after my account was "temporarily" locked. All I want is to regain access to my account, which contains a large portion of my hard-earned savings. I cannot begin to describe how stressful this experience has been, and I've given up trying to get updates from Marcus customer service. Please help.Business Response
Date: 09/01/2023
BBB
Response ******
ID
********
Marcus
by Goldman Sachs, a brand of Goldman Sachs Bank USA (the “Bank”), received the
above-referenced complaint via the Better Business Bureau Complaint Portal on
August 25, 2023. The Bank appreciates the opportunity to address the concerns
raised by ****** ****** (the “Customer”) related to accessing their Online
Savings Account (“OSA”).
On June
27, 2023, the Bank received a transfer request from the Customer’s OSA to an external
account. The Bank identified security concerns regarding the transfer, declined
the transaction, and restricted the account until the security concerns could
be resolved.
On June
29, 2023, the Customer contacted the Bank regarding their account access, but
the Bank was unable to clear the security concerns. As an alternative
verification method, the Bank requested an Affidavit of Identity (“AOI”) is from
the Customer. The AOI was later
received by the Bank on July 26, 2023.
On July
28, 2023, and August 10, 2023, the Customer contacted the Bank for an update on
their account access; however, due to an inadvertent error the reviewed of the
AOI was delayed. On August 30, 2023, the Bank reviewed the documentation and
restored the Customer’s online account access.
Due to
the Customer’s experience, the Bank will be providing a credit to the Customer’s account as a
token of goodwill within the next five business days.
Based on
the above details, the Bank kindly requests this complaint to be closed.Customer Answer
Date: 09/07/2023
Better Business Bureau:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID ********, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me. My account access was indeed restored on Aug 30, and I have received a $25 credit. I hope that Marcus is able to amend it's customer service practices to prevent this sort of delay in re-opening temporarily-locked accounts again. It shouldn't take a complaint to the BBB to achieve this outcome.
Sincerely,
****** ******Initial Complaint
Date:08/25/2023
Type:Billing IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
I never received my august bill. I was contacted by company and told i had to pay 378. To not get a negative on my credit report when my past due was 170 something. My next bill would be due in September 13. ut if i didnt pay 300 something i was going to get a past due on my credit report.Business Response
Date: 08/31/2023
Goldman Sachs Bank *** (the Bank) received the above-referenced complaint related to the ** Card via the Better Business Bureau (BBB) Complaint Portal on August 25, 2023. We appreciate the opportunity to address the concerns raised by *************************** (the Customer) related to obtaining statements and past due reporting.
The Bank conducted an investigation and confirmed no Bank error occurred. The Bank did not receive the required minimum amount due by August 13, 2023. As a result, the account received a past due fee of $29.00. Currently the account has a minimum due of $378.00, which includes the previous months minimum due of $171.00 and the past due fee of $29.00. The Bank sent Statements, Payment Due Reminders, Missed Payment Reminders, and Eligible for Bureau Reporting reminders to the email and physical address provided by the Customer. The Customer was reported current with no negative reporting. The Bank confirmed reporting is accurate as of the last furnishing. The past due amount is reported to the credit bureaus once it is 30 days past the due date of August 13, 2023.
Based on the above details, we kindly request this complaint to be closed.Initial Complaint
Date:08/24/2023
Type:Service or Repair IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
Marcus closed my online saving account for no reason. I still have $4000 in its saving account but I cant transfer it to my other accounts or access Marcuss online account now.Business Response
Date: 09/01/2023
BBB Response ****
ID ********
**********************, a brand of Goldman Sachs Bank *** (the Bank), received the above-referenced complaint via the Better Business Bureau Complaint Portal on August 25, 2023. The Bank appreciates the opportunity to address the concerns raised by ******************* (the Customer) related to closing their ************** Account (***).
On August 13, 2023, the Customer opened, and subsequently funded an **** On August 24, 2023, the Bank conducted a processing review and identified security concerns regarding the Customers identity and restricted the **** Later that same day, the Customer contacted the Bank regarding their account access, and was informed of the Banks decision to close their account.
On August 30, 2023, the Bank sent an e-mail to the Customer requesting that the they contact the Bank to assist with transferring their funds back to the original funding accounts. Subsequently, the Customer contacted the Bank later that day,and a Bank specialist inadvertently informed the Customer that the funds are in the process of returning to the ****
Due to the Customers experience and delay in closing the **** the Bank will provide the Customer a credit within the next five business days, to their *** as a token of goodwill.
Currently,the Bank remains unable to identify a verified phone number to contact the Customer. The Bank requests the Customer to contact the Bank at ************** ***************), Monday to Friday, 8 am - 10 pm, or Saturday to Sunday, 9 am -7 pm ET to provide authorization on transferring the remaining balance of the *** funds to the original funding accounts.
Based on the above details, the Bank kindly requests this complaint to be closed.Initial Complaint
Date:08/24/2023
Type:Customer Service IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
Spoke with 6 different customer service employees at ********************-********************************************* on August 24, 2023 during 3 separate phone calls. I was attempting to add the name of my daughter to my savings account, making it a joint account. After she gave 3 different individuals her personal information over the course of numerous, lengthy phone holds, I was informed that, finally, her name was added to my account. She would be able to access the savings account initially through my log information, and then create her own password for access. When I went to the Marcus app and logged in, a notification stated an application was pending. When I clicked on the notification, it brought me to a signature page to complete my account request. Immediately following, a second savings account was opened in my name. I did not request this second account, and further, my daughters name does not appear on either account. Aside from the number of customer service representatives that I spoke with today to accomplish a very simple request, my daughters private information had to be repeated to 3 different individuals which left her feeling extremely uncomfortable and vulnerable. This experience has left me frustrated, dissatisfied and unlikely to deposit further, considerable funds in this account, and more likely to research and move my money elsewhere.Business Response
Date: 08/31/2023
BBB Response ********
ID ********
**********************, a brand of Goldman Sachs Bank *** (the Bank), received the above referenced complaint via the Better Business Bureau Complaint Portal on August 24, 2023. The Bank appreciates the opportunity to address the concerns raised by ************************************* (the Customer) related to the unauthorized opening of an ************** Account (OSA).
On August 10, 2023, the Banks records show the Customer applied to open two OSAs via the Banks website; however,only one was opened and the other remained in a pending status. On August 24,2023, the Customer contacted the Bank, and a Bank specialist assisted adding a joint owner to the **** Later the same day, the Customer completed the account application which subsequently opened the second ****
On August 28, 2023, the Bank conducted a post booking account review identifying security concerns with the Customers identity, and restricted the **** On August 30, 2023, the Bank attempted unsuccessfully to contact the Customer to remediate the security concerns.
The Bank requests the Customer to contact the Bank at ************** ***************), Monday to Friday, 8 am -10 pm, or Saturday to Sunday, 9 am - 7 pm ET to resolve the security concerns.
Based on the above details, the Bank kindly request this complaint to be closed.Initial Complaint
Date:08/23/2023
Type:Service or Repair IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
I wanted to transfer my money out to my original account but instead of transferring my money out, they locked my account and their customer service is horrible. They could not verify my identity and said cannot provide anything on the review even though I was the one who initiated the review. I need my money to pay for tuition and now because of this stupid online bank I was unable to do so. Pls avoid !!!Business Response
Date: 08/30/2023
BBB Response **
ID ********
Marcus by Goldman Sachs, a brand of Goldman Sachs Bank USA (the “Bank”), received the above-referenced complaint via the Better Business Bureau Complaint Portal on August 23, 2023. The Bank appreciates the opportunity to address the concerns raised by ***** ** (the “Customer”) related to their Online Savings Account (“OSA”) access.
On August 21, 2023, the Customer initiated an outgoing transfer from their OSA to a linked account. The following day, the Bank identified security concerns regarding the external account and attempted unsuccessfully to contact the Customer to address the security concerns. Unfortunately, a Bank specialist inadvertently declined the transfer and restricted the Customer’s OSA. On August 24, 2023, the Customer contacted the Bank and the external institution via three-way call to clear the security concerns.
On August 25, 2023, the Customer initiated an outgoing transfer from their OSA to a linked account which the Bank successfully processed. Due to the Customer’s experience, the Bank provided a $25 credit as a token of goodwill on August 29, 2023.
Based on the above details, the Bank kindly requests this complaint to be closed.Initial Complaint
Date:08/22/2023
Type:Billing IssuesStatus:ResolvedMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
I am writing this complaint via the BBB platform to express my extreme dissatisfaction with the services provided by Marcus by Goldman Sachs. I opened an account at July 4 using a referral link (code: ************) with the understanding that I would receive a bonus 1% APY for the first three months. My account number is ************.
Despite following all the required steps, the promised bonus has not been applied to my account. I called your customer service team in early August to resolve this issue, and I was assured that the bonus would be applied promptly. However, as of August 22, the bonus has still not been applied to my account.
I am extremely frustrated with this situation. I've spent considerable time and effort to resolve this issue by calling your customer service multiple times, without success. This experience has led me to question the integrity and reliability of Marcus by Goldman Sachs.
I request immediate application of the promised 1% APY bonus to my account and additional compensation for the inconvenience caused. Failure to adequately resolve this issue will force me to consider other banking options and share my experience across social media platforms.
I expect a prompt resolution to this matter, and I will be following up to ensure that the issue is fully resolved.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter.
Sincerely,Business Response
Date: 08/29/2023
BBB
Response *****
ID ********
Marcus
by Goldman Sachs, a brand of Goldman Sachs Bank USA (the “Bank”), received the
above referenced complaint via the Better Business Bureau Complaint Portal on August
22, 2023. The Bank appreciates the opportunity to address the concerns raised
by ****** ***** (the “Customer”) related to a referral bonus with their Online
Savings Account (“OSA”).
The Bank
is offering an additional 1% Annual Percentage Yield (“APY”) referral bonus for
3 months for existing OSA customers. The Marcus Referred Rate terms and
conditions require OSA customers to provide a unique referral link to individuals
that are not OSA or CD customers for the past 12 months, and the individual
must open an OSA using the referral link. The existing customer and new
customer would receive an additional 1% APY for a period of 3 months. The
referred rates may only be combined with other non-referral promotional offers.
A customer must have an OSA at the time of using their referral link to earn an
additional 1% APY referral bonus.
On
August 2, 2023, the Customer contacted the Bank to inquire on the Marcus
Referred Rate increase for the applicable 3-month period not reflecting on
their OSA, and a Bank specialist created a case to be reviewed. Unfortunately,
due to a processing error, the case was inadvertently closed.
On
August 28, 2023, the Bank attempted unsuccessfully multiple times to contact
the Customer to assist with applying the referral code. The Bank requests the
Customer to contact the Bank at ************** (###-###-####), Monday to
Friday, 8 am - 10 pm, or Saturday to Sunday, 9 am - 7 pm ET to assist with applying
the referral code to their OSA.
Based on
the above details, the Bank kindly request this complaint to be closed.Customer Answer
Date: 09/02/2023
Complaint: ********
I am rejecting this response because: I've already provided the referral code I used to open the account, and I believe there is nothing else I should do to apply this promotion.
Referral link: ***********************************************************************
Sincerely,
****** *****Business Response
Date: 09/12/2023
BBB Response ***** ID ********
Marcus by Goldman Sachs, a brand of Goldman Sachs Bank USA (the “Bank”), received the above
referenced complaint via the Better Business Bureau Complaint Portal on September 5, 2023. The Bank
appreciates the opportunity to address the concerns raised by ****** ***** (the “Customer”) related
to a referral bonus with their Online Savings Account (“OSA”).On September 8, 2023, the Customer contacted the Bank to apply the referral code to their OSA and a
Bank specialist successfully assisted with applying the referral code to their account.Based on the above details, the Bank kindly request this complaint to be closed.
Customer Answer
Date: 09/14/2023
Better Business Bureau:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID ********, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me.
Sincerely,
****** *****
Marcus by Goldman Sachs is BBB Accredited.
This business has committed to upholding the BBB Standards for Trust.
Why choose a BBB Accredited Business?BBB Business Profiles may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.
BBB Business Profiles are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. BBB asks third parties who publish complaints, reviews and/or responses on this website to affirm that the information provided is accurate. However, BBB does not verify the accuracy of information provided by third parties, and does not guarantee the accuracy of any information in Business Profiles.
When considering complaint information, please take into account the company's size and volume of transactions, and understand that the nature of complaints and a firm's responses to them are often more important than the number of complaints.
BBB Business Profiles generally cover a three-year reporting period, except for customer reviews. Customer reviews posted prior to July 5, 2024, will no longer be published when they reach three years from their submission date. Customer reviews posted on/after July 5, 2024, will be published indefinitely unless otherwise voluntarily retracted by the user who submitted the content, or BBB no longer believes the review is authentic. BBB Business Profiles are subject to change at any time. If you choose to do business with this company, please let them know that you checked their record with BBB.
As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business. Businesses are under no obligation to seek BBB accreditation, and some businesses are not accredited because they have not sought BBB accreditation. BBB charges a fee for BBB Accreditation. This fee supports BBB's efforts to fulfill its mission of advancing marketplace trust.