Skip to main content

Cookies on BBB.org

We use cookies to give users the best content and online experience. By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to allow us to use all cookies. Visit our Privacy Policy to learn more.

Manage Cookies
Share
Business Profile

Loans

Marcus by Goldman Sachs

Headquarters

Complaints

This profile includes complaints for Marcus by Goldman Sachs's headquarters and its corporate-owned locations. To view all corporate locations, see

Find a Location

Marcus by Goldman Sachs has 3 locations, listed below.

*This company may be headquartered in or have additional locations in another country. Please click on the country abbreviation in the search box below to change to a different country location.

    Country
    Please enter a valid location.

    Customer Complaints Summary

    • 1,697 total complaints in the last 3 years.
    • 602 complaints closed in the last 12 months.

    If you've experienced an issue

    Submit a Complaint

    The complaint text that is displayed might not represent all complaints filed with BBB. Some consumers may elect to not publish the details of their complaints, some complaints may not meet BBB's standards for publication, or BBB may display a portion of complaints when a high volume is received for a particular business.

    Sort by

    Complaint status

    Complaint type

    • Initial Complaint

      Date:10/19/2023

      Type:Billing Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      I am not liable for this debit with APPLE CARD - GS BANK USA
      This Account was taken over by fraudsters who made fraudulent transactions.

      Business Response

      Date: 10/26/2023

      Goldman Sachs Bank USA (the “Bank”) received the
      above-referenced complaint related to Apple Card via the Better Business Bureau
      (“BBB”) Complaint Portal on October 19, 2023. The Bank appreciates the
      opportunity to address the concerns raised by ******* ***** (the “Customer”)
      related to 43 fraudulent transactions posted between February 2022 to December
      2022, and an unauthorized takeover of the Apple Card account.
      The Bank conducted an investigation and confirmed no Bank
      error occurred. The Customer contacted the Bank from February 2022 to March
      2023 to dispute the majority of the posted transactions on the account as
      fraudulent. The Bank placed temporary credits on the Customer’s account while
      all the disputes were investigated. Based on multiple investigation and a
      review of all the evidence provided, the Bank ruled the 43 transaction disputes
      in favor of the various Merchants. The Bank conducted a review of the
      Customer’s account between February 2022 to December 2022 and was unable to
      locate any fraudulent, suspicious, or unauthorized takeovers of the Customer’s
      account. The Customer confirmed with the Bank the Customer authorized purchases
      that were made.
      As provided in the Apple Card Account Agreement
      (“Agreement”), the Customer is responsible for protecting their credentials in
      accordance with the below section of the Agreement:
      “PROTECTING YOUR ACCOUNT INFORMATION, CREDENTIALS, AND
      ELIGIBLE DEVICES. You are solely responsible for maintaining the security of
      your Cards, your Eligible Devices and their passcodes, your Apple ID, and any
      other authentication credentials used in connection with your Account
      (collectively, your "Credentials"). If you authorize or allow anyone
      else to use your Account (e.g., by providing your physical Card or the passcode
      to your Eligible Device, allowing a third party to set up Face ID or add their
      fingerprint to use Touch ID, or otherwise providing any of your Credentials to
      a third party), the person may be able to make Transactions using your Account,
      and you will be liable for all Transactions made on your Account by that
      person.”
      As a result, the temporary credits that have been applied to
      the Customer’s account have been reversed. The Bank has sent the Customer
      emails detailing the dispute outcomes.
      The Bank confirmed the credit reporting is correct and accurate,
      the Bank is obligated to report accurately to credit reporting agencies. The
      Bank is unable to remove the transactions from the Customer’s account.
      The Bank contacted the Customer on October 24, 2023, and
      provided this information. During the interaction the Bank confirmed the Bank
      would mail the Customer copies of the Customer’s statements. The Bank sent the
      Customer the requested documents on October 25, 2023, validating the Customer's
      debt including a copy of the Apple Card Customer Agreement and a complete
      statement history showing records of transactions and payments to validate the
      balance and the debt owed. The Customer is responsible for the balance on the
      account in the amount of $15,430.57 provided in the latest statement from July
      2023.
      Based on the above details, the Bank kindly requests for
      this complaint to be closed.
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:10/18/2023

      Type:Billing Issues
      Status:
      ResolvedMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      Dear Goldman Sachs,On 10/13 I received an email to renew my Business Line Of Credit. I was instantly denied stating my Amazon sales have declined in 2023. The global economic slowdown is the reason for the decrease in sales. I have no balance on the line of credit and anytime I borrowed from the line it was repaid very quickly and on time. My credit score also hovers around 850 and has been this way for almost 20 years. I called on 10/13 to escalate this case to management but never heard back. On 10/18 I tried calling again and spoke to a woman who said there is nothing that I can do and the line of credit will expire on 12/18. She suggested maybe I should request a draw to keep the account open but there would be no guarantee that It would be approved. I really do not understand the thought process of borrowing funds when they are not needed at the time. I was hoping someone could review this and approve my renewal.Thank you. *****************

      Business Response

      Date: 10/25/2023

      Marcus by Goldman Sachs, a brand of Goldman Sachs Bank *** (the Bank), received the above referenced complaint via the Better Business Bureau (BBB) Complaint Portal on October 18, 2023. ******** appreciates the opportunity to address the issues raised by ***************** (the Customer).
      The Customers complaint alleges an error occurred around the processing of a renewal application.  ******** conducted an investigation into the Customers complaint and confirmed there was no error with the handling of the Customers renewal application. Our records show the Customer submitted a renewal application on October 13, 2023. The bank confirmed that the Customer received an email on October 13, 2023, correctly detailing why the bank was unable to approve the customers renewal application. 
      Our goal is to provide excellent customer service and an exceptional experience, and we apologize that their experience was less than satisfactory.
      Based on the above information, the Bank kindly requests this complaint to be closed.

      Customer Answer

      Date: 10/26/2023

       
      Better Business Bureau:

      I received a phone call from Goldman Sachs. Unfortunately AI makes all the decisions nowadays and due to a decrease in 2023 sales a long standing business relationship was not renewed. There is a zero balance on this line of credit and I will allow it to close permanently on December 12, 2023.

      Sincerely,

      *****************
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:10/16/2023

      Type:Billing Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      This company keep giving me the run around. About 4 months ago, someone tried to open up a saving account in my name. I got a phone call from the saving account department, and they asked me did i open a saving account I told them no. They would not give me any information because they said the social security number did not match. So, I told them it must be fraud, so they closed the account and lock my credit card account that I did have with them. I can use the card but i cannot access my account. I have been trying to get this mess straighten out for 4 months. Then on October 7 they sent me a letter that I need to call them I did, and they said I would have call back when I have the right information. I don't have any information about a saving account because I did not open one up. So, my credit card account is still locked up, but I can still use my card. I am tired of these incompetent people. So, please help me get this straight I do not want this false information on my record.

      Business Response

      Date: 10/24/2023

      BBB Response ****** ID ******** (Rec’d October 17, 2023)
      Marcus by Goldman Sachs, a brand of Goldman Sachs Bank USA (the “Bank”), received the above-referenced complaint via the Better Business Bureau Complaint Portal on October 17, 2023. The Bank appreciates the opportunity to address the concerns raised by ******** ****** (the "Consumer”) related to the unauthorized opening of an Online Savings Account (“OSA”).
      On July 7, 2023, an individual opened an OSA with the Consumer’s information. On July 18, 2023, the Bank reviewed the OSA, identified security concerns regarding the Consumer’s identity, restricted the account, and opened an investigation. Later that same day, the Bank contacted the Consumer and the Consumer advised a Bank specialist that the account was opened without authorization. Due to an inadvertent error, there was a delay closing the unauthorized OSA.
      On October 19, 2023, the Bank completed the investigation, removed the restriction, and closed the unauthorized OSA.
      Based on the above details, the Bank kindly requests this complaint to be closed.
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:10/16/2023

      Type:Service or Repair Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      In February 2022 I used my Apple Card to put a deposit of 338.75 to majestic resort in punta cana Dominican Republic for may of this year. The destination wedding was cancelled and I followed all the necessary steps to cancel within guidelines. Within 2 months of 2022 I paid off the balance. This year I started to review all my statements as my Apple Card has been hacked numerous times. While looking I saw that I paid for my balance and therefore, the monies should have been refunded and never was. I called Apple and what they tell me is that they have given me a credit while I dispute but they charge me right back for a service I fully paid for, cancelled and never attended. This has been ongoing and my impression is that Apple does not want to reach out of the country to confirm that I never went and cancelled. They tell me to call or get information which I can’t not obtain. They will not reimburse me when I ask that if I call to get proof will they reimburse the cost of placing the call. They continue to dispute saying they have given me a credit that I have never used as I always pay my card. But how can u give a credit for something I already had paid for in full and always being my acct to 0. Every month the claim to assert the dispute and every month I look at my statement and see the add it right back to my balance claiming they gave me a credit. How did u give a credit for something that was paid for and when I use my card I immediately pay for it. At this point this makes me want to close all my accounts. If they give me a credit, my acct should always be in the negative of that amount and any charges I add should be deducted. But again I always bring my account to 0 within a month or 2 and I never have an on going bill. I paid in full by March 2022 so they should not be tacking on the amount again and requesting payment. I wish I had never asserted a claim even if I took the loss of services. I have all my statements from then to prove I paid in full

      Business Response

      Date: 10/23/2023

      Goldman Sachs Bank USA (the “Bank”) received the
      above-referenced complaint related to the Apple Card via the Better Business
      Bureau (“BBB”) Complaint Portal on October 16, 2023. The Bank appreciates the
      opportunity to address the concerns raised by ********* ******** (the
      “Customer”) related to a disputed transaction of $338.75 with merchant Majestic
      Resort.

      The Bank conducted an investigation and confirmed no error
      occurred. The Bank opened a dispute on February 1, 2023, for a transaction of
      $338.75 with merchant Majestic Resort which posted to the account on February
      21, 2022. The Customer stated the scheduled trip was cancelled and no visit to
      the resort occurred. Based on the investigation and the review of the evidence
      provided, the Bank resolved the dispute in favor of the merchant. Evidence
      provided by the Customer did not reflect any credit due. The temporary credit
      in the amount of $338.75 applied to the account on February 1, 2023, was
      removed and the Bank sent the Customer an email detailing the dispute outcome
      on April 18, 2023.

      The Bank confirmed the dispute was reopened on April 18,
      2023, June 23, 2023, and August 29, 2023. Based on the investigation and the
      review of the evidence provided, the Bank resolved the dispute in favor of the
      merchant. The merchant’s terms and conditions state deposits are non-refundable
      in the event of booking cancellation. The temporary credit in the amount of
      $338.75 applied to the account on April 18, 2023, June 23, 2023, and August 29,
      2023, were removed and the Bank sent the Customer emails detailing the dispute
      outcome on June 23, 2023, August 25, 2023, and October 19, 2023.

      The Customer may contact the Bank directly to request
      closure of the account. The Bank is available by phone at ###-###-#### or by
      message from the Wallet app. The Bank is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a
      week.

      Based on the above details, the Bank kindly requests for
      this complaint to be closed.

      Customer Answer

      Date: 10/24/2023



      Complaint: ********



      I am rejecting this response because: Goldman Sachs gave me a credit of 338.75 which I had already paid. Within 2 months of making the reservation. My account was zero balance. I’ve never had a revolving credit open with my Apple Card. Any purchases I make, I pay off the following month. How can Goldman Sachs give a credit which I have never used. Any and all purchases made after that, get immediately paid. My account is never revolving. I use it, I pay it. Therefore, the credit that was given to me, was never used and paid for. Please request all my statements for my card. I paid my balance in full. Goldman Sachs appears that they DO NOT want to reach out, out of the country to verify I cancelled and never went to the destination. My issue now is that they want me to pay again. Again, the card was paid in full, never has been revolving, therefore I have never used the alleged credit. 



      Sincerely,



      ********* ********

      Business Response

      Date: 10/31/2023

      Goldman Sachs Bank USA (the “Bank”) received the
      above-referenced complaint related to the Apple Card via the Better Business
      Bureau (“BBB”) Complaint Portal on October 16, 2023. The Bank appreciates the
      opportunity to address the concerns raised by ********* ******** (the
      “Customer”) related to a disputed transaction of $338.75 with merchant Majestic
      Resort.
      The Bank conducted an investigation and confirmed no error occurred. The Bank
      opened a dispute on February 1, 2023, for a transaction of $338.75 with
      merchant Majestic Resort which posted to the account on February 21, 2022. The
      Customer stated the scheduled trip was cancelled and no visit to the resort
      occurred. Based on the investigation and the review of the evidence provided,
      the Bank resolved the dispute in favor of the merchant. Evidence provided by
      the Customer did not reflect any credit due. The temporary credit in the amount
      of $338.75 applied to the account on February 1, 2023, was removed and the Bank
      sent the Customer an email detailing the dispute outcome on April 18, 2023.

      The Bank confirmed the dispute was reopened on April 18, 2023, June 23, 2023,
      and August 29, 2023. Based on the investigation and the review of the evidence
      provided, the Bank resolved the dispute in favor of the merchant. The
      merchant’s terms and conditions state deposits are non-refundable in the event
      of booking cancellation. The temporary credit in the amount of $338.75 applied
      to the account on April 18, 2023, June 23, 2023, and August 29, 2023, were
      removed and the Bank sent the Customer emails detailing the dispute outcome on
      June 23, 2023, August 25, 2023, and October 19, 2023.

      On October 30, 2023, The Bank mailed copies of every statement generated for
      the account starting back from December 2019. The Customer may contact the Bank
      directly to request additional details pertaining to the account. The Bank is
      available by phone at 1-877-255-5923 or by message from the Wallet app. The
      Bank is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
      Based on the above details, the Bank kindly requests for this complaint to be
      closed

      Customer Answer

      Date: 11/01/2023



      Complaint: ********



      I am rejecting this response because:

      The bank has not sent me any statements dating back to 2019 as they are claiming. On the contrary, I am the one who had to go and print all my statements since that transaction occurred incurring me costs.  I also am attaching documentation which I was able to finally get by researching on Expedia and what they could give me after they reached out to Majestic resort. The only proof after so long they could provide was that I was a no show.
       I am not disputing anything regarding fees of cancellation as states the bank.  At this point I am willing to accept the loss of the deposit paid.  However, I am refusing to pay a second time. Although the bank gave me a credit, I have never “used it” as that credit has never been available to me.  I used my card and the next month I pay it right away. I have not had and charges or payments revolving month after month. Any purchases I do, I pay off right away. Therefore, the “credit” given, is never used and should not be charged on my card.  Ie if I had used the credit as a result of purchase made and owed, rightfully so I should owe the bank. But, since the credit is never used, resulting from any charges I make since I immediately pay off the charges, I do not owe the bank. They should remove the charge. The files I have gathered and printed are too large to upload. I have taken a few pertinent screen shots and provide a mailing address I will send all my statement as proof that I paid the deposit and any charges thereafter have always been paid. 

      Sincerely,



      ********* ********

      Business Response

      Date: 11/08/2023

      BBB Response
      ******** # BBB ******** (Rec’d November 1, 2023)
      Goldman Sachs Bank USA (the “Bank”) received the above-referenced complaint related
      to the Apple Card via the Better Business Bureau (“BBB”) Complaint Portal on
      November 1, 2023. The Bank appreciates the opportunity to address the
      concerns raised by ********* ******** (the “Customer”) related to a
      transaction dispute of $338.75 with merchant Majestic Resorts.
      The Bank conducted an investigation and confirmed no Bank error occurred. The
      transaction posted to the account on February 21, 2022. The Customer
      initially opened the dispute on February 1, 2023, April 18, 2023, June 23,
      2023, and August 29, 2023. The Bank applied a temporary credit while the
      dispute was investigated. The Customer stated the scheduled trip was
      cancelled and no visit to the resort occurred. The merchant’s terms and
      conditions state deposits are non-refundable in the event of booking
      cancellation. Based on the Bank's investigation, the Bank resolved the
      dispute in favor of the merchant. As a result, the Bank reversed the
      temporary credit on the Customer’s account on April 18, 2023, June 23, 2023,
      August 25, 2023, and October 19, 2023. The Bank sent the Customer an email
      detailing the dispute outcome.
      During the dispute investigation the Bank provides a temporary credit, so the
      Customer does not incur interest for the amount of the dispute and is not
      responsible for repayment. If the dispute is found in the Customer’s favor
      the temporary credit becomes permanent on the Customer’s account. If the
      dispute is found in favor of the merchant, the Bank rebills the Customer. The
      Bank confirmed the balance is correct and accurate.
      The Bank directs the Customer to review their February, through
      April 2023 statements where the original credit applied to their account was used
      to pay existing balances and new transactions.
      On October 30, 2023, the Bank mailed copies of every statement generated for
      the account starting on December 2019. The Bank attempted to contact the
      Customer on November 2, 2023, November 3, 2023, and November 6, 2023, but was
      unsuccessful.
      Based on the above details, the Bank kindly requests for this complaint to be
      closed.

      Customer Answer

      Date: 11/09/2023



      Complaint: ********



      I am rejecting this response because: the bank once again, gave me a credit for which I had initially paid off. Again, every charge that occurred after this incident was paid immediately. I never used the credit nor kept as I immediately pay off new charges. The bank need to go through all my statements as I have printed them all and see I have never used the credit given. I paid the balance immediately and after having my card hacked so many times I decided this year to go back through all my statement I printed and found that I paid for the service which I did not attend and opened a dispute to get reimbursed. Instead they give a credit which I’ve never used. If I had used the credit, my account will have been zero. But since I charge on the card, I pay immediately new charges the following month. Had I not gone back after being hacked so many times, I wouldn’t have opened up a can of worms as the bank refuses to acknowledge that any new charges, as on all my statements, I pay for so the credit is never used. This has been the worse experience even more so then the hacking of my cards. I have yet to receive the banks statement which I am now demanding as I refuse to pay one penny more in costs I am incurring. Since I have been the one doing the leg work in this “investigation”. 



      Sincerely,



      ********* ********

      Business Response

      Date: 11/20/2023

      Goldman Sachs Bank USA (the “Bank”) received the above-referenced complaint
      related to the Apple Card via the Better Business Bureau (“BBB”) Complaint
      Portal on November 13, 2023. The Bank appreciates the opportunity to address
      the concerns raised by ********* ******** (the “Customer”) related to a
      transaction dispute of $338.75 with merchant Majestic Resorts.
      As stated in the Bank's previous response, the Bank conducted an
      investigation and confirmed no Bank error occurred. The transaction posted to
      the account on February 21, 2022. The Customer initially opened the dispute
      on February 1, 2023, April 18, 2023, June 23, 2023, and August 29, 2023. The
      Bank applied a temporary credit while the dispute was investigated. The
      Customer stated the scheduled trip was cancelled and no visit to the resort
      occurred. The merchant’s terms and conditions state deposits are
      non-refundable in the event of booking cancellation. Based on the Bank's
      investigation, the Bank resolved the dispute in favor of the merchant. As a
      result, the Bank reversed the temporary credit on the Customer’s account on
      April 18, 2023, June 23, 2023, August 25, 2023, and October 19, 2023. The
      Bank sent the Customer an email detailing the dispute outcome.
      During the dispute investigation the Bank provides a temporary credit, so the
      Customer does not incur interest for the amount of the dispute and is not
      responsible for repayment. If the dispute is found in the Customer’s favor
      the temporary credit becomes permanent on the Customer’s account. If the
      dispute is found in favor of the merchant, the Bank rebills the Customer. The
      Bank confirmed the balance is correct and accurate.
      The Bank directs the Customer to review the February 28, 2023, April 30,
      2023, June 30, 2023, and August 31, 2023, statements where the temporary
      credit applied to the account and was used to pay existing balances and new
      transactions.
      On October 30, 2023, the Bank mailed copies of every statement generated for
      the account starting on December 2019. The Bank attempted to contact the
      Customer on November 13, 2023, November 14, 2023, and November 15, 2023, but
      was unsuccessful.
      Based on the above details, the Bank kindly requests for this complaint to be
      closed.

      Customer Answer

      Date: 11/24/2023



      Complaint: ********



      I am rejecting this response because: 8/31/22 previous balance $133.06 + new charges =$534.51. 8/2022 new charges being paid balance owed $245.25 (credit not used). 10/2022 previous balance + new charges paid$287.97 balance left $148.91 (credit not used). 11/2022 balance with new charges 282.82 no credit used. 12/2022 balance 143.37. 1/2023 card almost paid, credit not used leaving balance of 46.35. By 3/2023 balance was -180.13, Overpayment. At this point the “credit” was billed again. 4/2023 balance now 313.74. May 2023 new charges $259.91. Paid off 6/2023 1.00 balance left. Credit given back still not used 1.00 balance left. 7/2023 total balance remaining 14.14. 8/2023 new charges $270.80. 9/2023 “credit” charged again bringing balance to $502.42. I used the card and paid the reservation back in 2022. I was given a credit back that I never used and the only reason that this has become an issue is bc I went back through my statements as a result of my card always being hacked and found that I used the card for a reservation, paid it off and then did not attend. Since I have not used that “credit” and as per phone calls made to Goldman Sachs Apple Card, prior to going to BBB that credit can not be used, I have already paid for the amount of 338.75. since the credit was not and could not be used i should not be billed for it again. This website is currently not allowing me to upload the same photos previously uploaded. 



      Sincerely,



      ********* ********
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:10/13/2023

      Type:Billing Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      Acct Name: APPLE CARD/GS BANK USA Amount: $9147 Date Opened:8/22/2019
      Acct # ****************

      Please remove the fraud Account from my Credit Report does not relate to any transactions that I have made.

      The credit bureaus keep disrespecting the law . I have showed them multiple times how they are violating the FAIR CREDIT REPORTING ACT .
      According to 15 USC 168i(15) the credit bureaus have to modify or delete account that are not reporting accurately.
      According to 15 USC 1681b(1) the credit bureaus don’t have no written permission
      According to 15 USC 1681 have the right to privacy
      According to 15 USC 168s-2 A person shall not furnish any information relating to a consumer to any consumer reporting agency if the person knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the information is inaccurate .
      (B) Reporting information after notice and confirmation of errors
      According to 15 USC 1681 I have the right to privacy
      According to 15 USC 1681s-2 A person shall not furnish any information relating to a consumer to any any consumer reporting agency if the person knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the information is inaccurate.
      (B) Reporting Information after notice and confirmation of errors
      A person shall not furnish information relating to a consumer to any consumer reporting agency
      (i) The person has been notified by the consumer, at the address specified by the person for such
      Notices, that specifies information inaccurate, and
      (ii) the information is, in, fact, inaccurate.
      The credit bureaus have no respect for the laws.
      Someone needs to hold them accountable for this.

      Business Response

      Date: 10/20/2023

      Goldman Sachs Bank USA (the “Bank”) received the above-referenced complaint
      related to Apple Card via the Better Business Bureau (“BBB”) Complaint Portal
      on October 14, 2023. The Bank appreciates the opportunity to address the
      concerns raised by ******** *********** (the “Customer”) related to an Apple
      Card account opened without authorization.

      The Bank conducted an investigation and confirmed no Bank error occurred. The
      Bank confirmed the account was booked on August 22, 2019. The account is
      currently under review. The Bank requires additional time to complete the
      investigation. If the Customer has any additional questions or concerns, the
      Customer can contact the Bank directly via chat using the Wallet App and/or
      via phone by calling ###-###-####.

      Based on the above details, the Bank kindly requests for this complaint to be
      closed.
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:10/13/2023

      Type:Service or Repair Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      I opened an account with Marcus by Goldman Sachs on Oct. 8th, 2023. I deposited in total on $230,000 from my own personal Wells Fargo and Chase accounts. Then the Marcus by Goldman Sachs locked my account. The money disappears from my other bank account yet I couldn't access them from Marcus as well. I have tried to call them for three days on a roll; but they still refuse to unlock me with the reason of "not being able to verify my identity" (with all the account information I provided to them, ID, password, DOB, SSN, etc.). I think this is a fraud.

      Business Response

      Date: 10/20/2023

      BBB
      Response **
      ID ********
      Marcus
      by Goldman Sachs, a brand of Goldman Sachs Bank USA (the “Bank”), received the
      above-referenced complaint via the Better Business Bureau Complaint Portal on October
      13, 2023. The Bank appreciates the opportunity to address the concerns raised
      by ********* ** (the “Customer”) related to accessing their Online Savings
      Account (“OSA”).
      On
      October 10, 2023, the Customer initiated multiple incoming ACH transfers from
      their linked account to their OSA. On October 11, 2023, during the transfer processing
      review, the Bank identified security concerns regarding the Customer’s identity
      and restricted the OSA. Later that same day, the Customer contacted the Bank regarding their account
      access, and as an alternative verification method, the Bank requested the
      Customer to complete an Affidavit of Identity (“AOI”), which the Customer later
      declined. 
      On October 13, 2023, the Customer contacted the
      Bank requesting to close their OSA. Unfortunately, the funds were not available
      for withdrawal until October 17, 2023, and October 19, 2023, respectively. According
      to the Bank’s Deposit Account Agreement (“DAA”), funds received by ACH transfer
      initiated through the Bank from a linked external account will generally be
      available five business days after the Customer initiates the ACH transfer. On
      October 19, 2023, the Customer initiated two outgoing transfers from their OSA to
      the original funding accounts. The following day, the Bank successfully
      processed the transfers and closed the OSA.
      Based on
      the above details, the Bank kindly requests this complaint to be closed.
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:10/13/2023

      Type:Service or Repair Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      I have been trying to transfer funds out of Marcus Bank for last few weeks. I have been in communications with them every day, no exaggeration. Every day they either promise that it will happen tomorrow or come up with a new problem that needs to be solved. I have chat records as well. I am suspecting that I have been scammed. I have been on calls for hours at a time. At some point the funds came out of my account and I was being rudely directed to Citibank, stating that the funds are there. The funds were never there. The funds are with Marcus Bank and I cannot get it transferred to any of my outside verified accounts. A week ago I was told not to call them anymore because the funds are with Citibank and today I was told that the funds are with Markus Bank. Please help! I suspect I am being scammed.

      Business Response

      Date: 10/20/2023

      BBB Deposits *********
      ID ********
      Marcus by Goldman Sachs, a brand of Goldman Sachs Bank USA (the “Bank”), received the above-referenced complaint via the Better Business Bureau Complaint Portal on October 13, 2023. The Bank appreciates the opportunity to address the concerns raised by ***** ********* (the “Customer”) related to transfers from their Online Savings Account (“OSA”).
      On October 2, 2023, the Customer initiated an outgoing transfer from their OSA to a linked account. During the transfer processing review, the Bank identified security concerns regarding the transfer and attempted unsuccessfully to contact the Customer. Subsequently, the Bank declined the transaction and restricted the account until the security concerns could be resolved. The following day, the Customer contacted the Bank requesting to close their account. Unfortunately, due to an inadvertent error, a Bank specialist did not inform the Customer that the funds had to be returned to the original funding accounts resulting in a delay closing the Customer’s account.
      On October 17, 2023, the Bank contacted the Customer to assist with the account closure and re-initiate the outgoing transfers to the original funding accounts. The following day, the Bank successfully processed the transfers and closed the OSA. Due to the experience, the Bank will be providing the Customer with a credit to the account as a token of goodwill within the next five business days.
      Based on the above details, the Bank kindly requests this complaint to be closed.

      Customer Answer

      Date: 10/23/2023



      Complaint: ********


      The response contains misinformation and incomplete information. I am rejecting this response because: Several other incorrect transactions and incorrect promises/information was provided by the bank that was left out from the business response. Several other attempts were made to complete the transaction, the bank apologized each time, ensuring the transfer will take place the following day and yet it did not, because of some other additional questions they had each time. The customer has been communicating with the business on daily basis throughout the October 2-20, each time receiving different responses, and different concerns, and different tissues with the configuration of the transfers. The processes were in infinite loops until I contacted BBB. The institution in intentionally delaying the transfers out. 


    • Initial Complaint

      Date:10/13/2023

      Type:Billing Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      Acct Name: GS BANK USA-GENERALMOTORS Amount: $3458 Date Opened:7/7/2023
      Acct # **************** Acct Name:GS BANK USA-GENERALMOTORS Amount:$28681 Date Opened:6/14/2023 Acct #****************
      I am a victim of identity theft. According to 15 USC 168i(15) the credit bureaus have to modify or delete account that are not reporting accurately.
      According to 15 USC 1681b(1) the credit bureaus don’t have no written permission
      According to 15 USC 1681 have the right to privacy
      According to 15 USC 168s-2 A person shall not furnish any information relating to a consumer to any consumer reporting agency if the person knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the information is inaccurate .
      (B) Reporting information after notice and confirmation of errors
      According to 15 USC 1681 I have the right to privacy
      According to 15 USC 1681s-2 A person shall not furnish any information relating to a consumer to any any consumer reporting agency if the person knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the information is inaccurate.
      (B) Reporting Information after notice and confirmation of errors
      A person shall not furnish information relating to a consumer to any consumer reporting agency
      (i) The person has been notified by the consumer, at the address specified by the person for such
      Notices, that specifies information inaccurate, and
      (ii) the information is, in, fact, inaccurate.
      The credit bureaus have no respect for the laws.
      Someone needs to hold them accountable for this.

      Business Response

      Date: 10/20/2023

      Goldman Sachs Bank USA (the “Bank”) received the
      above-referenced complaint related to the GM Card via the Better Business
      Bureau (“BBB”) Complaint Portal on October 13, 2023. The Bank appreciates the
      opportunity to address the concerns raised by ****** ****** (the “Customer”)
      related to a GM Business Card and a My GM Rewards Card opened without
      authorization.

      The Bank confirmed the My GM Rewards Card account was booked
      on July 7, 2023, and the GM Business Card account was booked on June 14, 2023.
      The accounts are currently under review. The Bank requires additional time to
      complete the investigation. Once the investigation is complete, The Bank will
      send a letter to the customer.  If the
      Customer has any additional questions or concerns, the Customer can contact the
      Bank directly via chat by logging in online at marcus.com and/or via phone by
      calling ###-###-####.

      Based on the above details, the Bank kindly requests for
      this complaint to be closed.
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:10/12/2023

      Type:Billing Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      I am not liable for this debt with ******************* I do not have a contract with the collection agency trying to collect and report on this credit report. They did not provide me with the original contracts bearing wet signatures as requested.

      Business Response

      Date: 10/19/2023

      Goldman Sachs Bank *** (the Bank) received the above-referenced complaint related to the Apple Card via the Better Business Bureau (BBB) Complaint Portal on October 12, 2023. The Bank appreciates the opportunity to address the concerns raised by ************************* (the Customer)related to validation of debt.

      The Bank conducted an investigation and confirmed no error occurred. The Bank contacted the Customer on October 13, 2023, and received confirmation that the Customer applied for and opened the Apple Card account.The Bank sent the Customer the requested documents on October 16, 2023,validating the Customer's debt including a copy of the Apple Card Customer Agreement and all statement history showing records of transactions and payments to validate the balance and the debt owed. The Customer is responsible for the balance on the account in the amount of $2,338.37 provided in the latest statement from September 30, 2022. The Bank is unable to provide the Customer with signed documents as the Customer electronically consented to the Apple Card Terms and Conditions by completing the application and opening the account. The Bank is obligated to report accurately to the credit reporting agencies and is unable to remove the trade line from the Customers credit reporting as requested.

      Based on the above details, the Bank kindly requests for this complaint to be closed.
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:10/12/2023

      Type:Service or Repair Issues
      Status:
      ResolvedMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      In August of this year I got 5 savings accounts welcome letters welcoming me to this bank. Problem is, I didn't open 5 savings accounts at this bank. My identity was stolen. I called the bank immediately and they said they would investigate it. They did nothing. I am now getting monthly bank statements for these fraudulent accounts. When I call to try to get them to shut them down, they keep saying they have to "authenticate" me and I have to tell them the email address used to set up the accounts. How on earth would I know what the fraudster used for an email address???? So that's where the phone call ends. They won't talk to me because I don't have the fraudsters email address to verify 5 fraudulent bank accounts. It's absolutely crazy. The fraudsters have more protection than I do.

      Business Response

      Date: 10/17/2023

      BBB Response ******
      ID ********
      **********************, a brand of Goldman Sachs Bank *** (the Bank), received the above-referenced complaint via the Better Business Bureau Complaint Portal on October 12, 2023. The Bank appreciates the opportunity to address the concerns raised by ******************************* (the Consumer) related to the unauthorized opening of ************** Accounts (OSA).
      On August 21, 2023, an individual opened five OSAs with the Consumers information. On August 24, 2023, the Bank reviewed the OSAs, identified security concerns regarding the Consumers identity, restricted the accounts and opened an investigation.
      On October 4, 2023, the Consumer contacted the Bank inquiring about the status of the unauthorized OSAs, and a Bank specialist advised that the OSAs are still under investigation. On October 13, 2023, the Bank completed the investigation, and closed the unauthorized OSAs. Later that same day and on October 16, 2023, the Bank attempted unsuccessfully to contact the Consumer to inform them of the investigation.
      Based on the above details, the Bank kindly requests this complaint to be closed.

      Customer Answer

      Date: 10/18/2023

       
      Better Business Bureau:

      I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID ********, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me.

      Sadly, it took us filing a complaint in order to get this resolved.

      Sincerely,

      *******************************

    BBB Business Profiles may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.

    BBB Business Profiles are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. BBB asks third parties who publish complaints, reviews and/or responses on this website to affirm that the information provided is accurate. However, BBB does not verify the accuracy of information provided by third parties, and does not guarantee the accuracy of any information in Business Profiles.

    When considering complaint information, please take into account the company's size and volume of transactions, and understand that the nature of complaints and a firm's responses to them are often more important than the number of complaints.

    BBB Business Profiles generally cover a three-year reporting period, except for customer reviews. Customer reviews posted prior to July 5, 2024, will no longer be published when they reach three years from their submission date. Customer reviews posted on/after July 5, 2024, will be published indefinitely unless otherwise voluntarily retracted by the user who submitted the content, or BBB no longer believes the review is authentic. BBB Business Profiles are subject to change at any time. If you choose to do business with this company, please let them know that you checked their record with BBB.

    As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business. Businesses are under no obligation to seek BBB accreditation, and some businesses are not accredited because they have not sought BBB accreditation. BBB charges a fee for BBB Accreditation. This fee supports BBB's efforts to fulfill its mission of advancing marketplace trust.