Complaints
Customer Complaints Summary
- 1,344 total complaints in the last 3 years.
- 615 complaints closed in the last 12 months.
If you've experienced an issue
Submit a ComplaintThe complaint text that is displayed might not represent all complaints filed with BBB. Some consumers may elect to not publish the details of their complaints, some complaints may not meet BBB's standards for publication, or BBB may display a portion of complaints when a high volume is received for a particular business.
Initial Complaint
Date:03/26/2024
Type:Customer Service IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
3/26/24 called today to get my balance to pay this account in full. I was transferred 4 times, hung up on 4 times just for asking for a supervisor. All this just for wanting to pay this account in full and zero the balance out? The reps are very rude and nasty. I been in the hospital with ***** and wanted to clear this up.Business Response
Date: 03/27/2024
Acima Leasing (hereinafter us, we, our, Acima) received the complaint filed by ************************ through the Better Business Bureau on March 26, 2024. We investigated her complaint and prepared the following response.
We confirm ************************ called Acima several times on March 26, 2024, and was unwilling to verify her identity. Thus, we were unable to assist her. However, later that same date, ************************ complied with our verification process and received assistance in purchasing her lease. As such, we consider this matter closed.
Initial Complaint
Date:03/26/2024
Type:Billing IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
I purchased a play station for my son at Cellular repair in the *********** of *****************. I came in with the funds to purchase out right a playstation 5 for my son. The sales men explained to me that there was a company that would break the payment down for me, but he failed to tell me that my $1600 purchase would turn into a bill of $3781.60. I contacted the company to see how much my pay off balance is because I knew I was close to paying it off and when they replied with the amount they did I was floored. I asked how much their interest rate was and she advised they do not charge interest. I then asked the young lady, a representative for the company, how did the price triple and she could not give me an answer. She went on to say that the "cost of participating" is the cost of the equipment. I have no idea what that means, but once I advised that I would have to get someone involved she changed the information that she originally gave me. I have a really bad feeling about this company and I would like to settle for the amount of the equipment and be done with them.Business Response
Date: 03/28/2024
Acima (hereinafter we, us, our) received the complaint filed by Ms. ********** Forte through the Better Business Bureau on March 26, 2024. We were unable to locate a lease matching **************** provided identifying information. As such, we are unable to address this complaint. ************** may respond to this complaint with additional identification information, such as the lease number, so we may better assist her. Or if she would like to assist our agents in locating a lease account associated with her information, she may contact our customer service department by phone at **************.Customer Answer
Date: 03/28/2024
Complaint: 21490144
I am rejecting this response because: My name is ********************************** and the number on the account at the time was ********** but it's since changed to **********. The lease number is 17522923.
Sincerely,
Chardanele ForteBusiness Response
Date: 04/01/2024
In **************** rejection of our response, she provided sufficient identity information to locate a lease, as such we have prepared the following response.
On December 19, 2023, ************** entered an independent third-party retailer *************** (the Retailer) located in *****************, ********. While with the Retailer, she applied and was approved for our leasing services. On that same date, she selected property described as " Ps5 slim controller 1 games keyboard controller charger (the Property). Acima purchased the Property, and ************** electronically entered into a rental-purchase agreement (the Agreement) wherein she agreed to rent the Property from Acima. Pursuant to the Agreement, to obtain ownership of the Property ************** was required to make 26 biweekly lease renewal payments of $142.37 before tax, plus an initial rent payment of $80.00 before tax for a total of $3,781.60 (the Total of Payments) before tax. Alternatively, she could execute any other early purchase or termination option outlined within the Agreement.
As a courtesy to our customers, we offer two Early Purchase Options (EPOs); each of which reduces the cost of ownership and terminates the Agreement earlier than the rental period contained within. The first EPO is a 90-day EPO wherein ************** *** obtain ownership of the Property by paying $1,680.00 before tax by March 18, 2024. The second EPO stipulates that ************** can obtain ownership at any point after the first 90 days by paying a lump sum payment equivalent to 65% of any remaining renewal payments.
************** alleges, The [Retailer] explained to [her] that there was a company that would break the payment down for [her], but [the Retailer] failed to tell [her] that [her] $1,600 purchase would turn into a bill of $3,781.60. For clarification, ************** is only expected to pay the Total of Payments if she does not exercise an EPO or termination option, and rents the Property for the entire rental period. Stated differently, ************** *** return the Property at any time and end any obligation associated with this Agreement, or purchase the Property during the course of her lease. Further, we confirm that the cost of leasing is determined at the conception of the Agreement, does not change, and was disclosed to ************** prior to allowing her to enter the Agreement. Pursuant to our records, on December 12, 2023, we sent ************** a text message to the phone number she provided on the application containing a link to the Agreement. We confirm this link was clicked, and she was provided a breakdown of the rental payment amounts and frequency, as well as her Total of Payments and 90-Day EPO amount. ************** was then provided with the opportunity to scroll through a full copy of the Agreement prior to signing. On December 12, 2023, at 5:24 pm MT ************** electronically signed the Agreement, certifying she read and agreed to the terms and conditions.
Acima confirms ************** was advised of her 90-day EPO expiration date on December 20, 2023, in a call with Acimas customer service department. Additionally, we sent her a Welcome to Acima email to the address provided on the application, on December 21, 2023, with the 90-day EPO expiration date provided. We confirm this email was opened on the same day by the recipient. We again sent ************** this email on January 2, 2024, and we confirm it was opened on January 3, 2024. ************** did not exercise her 90-Day EPO on or before the deadline indicated, and as such this option expired. Should ************** wish to purchase the Property, *** execute the second EPO.
As we have addressed all of **************** concerns and provided a thorough response, we consider this complaint closed. If ************** has further questions or would like to explore any purchase, or termination options that *** be available to her, she *** contact our customer service department at **************.Customer Answer
Date: 04/03/2024
Complaint: 21490144
I am rejecting this response because this information is incorrect, but the eqiupment will be returned and the agreement will end. That is fine with me.
Sincerely,
Chardanele ForteInitial Complaint
Date:03/25/2024
Type:Product IssuesStatus:ResolvedMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
On Monday 3/25, I received 4 emails from Acima (a company I never heard of) that I now had a lease with them and that a credit card that is expired was used to purchase items in my name. This was clearly fraudulent activity. I called Acima after I saw 3 emails this afternoon. I forwarded those emails plus a 4th I received tonight to the email provided to when I spoke to their fraud department. I haven’t heard back yet but I just want this emails from them to stop and for them to delete my name and information from their system!Business Response
Date: 03/26/2024
Acima Leasing (hereinafter “us,” “we,” “our,” “Acima”) received the complaint by Mr. ***** ************ through the Better Business Bureau on March 25, 2024. Mr. ************ alleges identity theft. Acima takes fraud allegations very seriously. We request Mr. ************ to file a police report and provide us with a full and complete copy of the same so we may continue our investigation of this lease. We request he send a copy of the police report, which must include Acima as an affected lease, to ***************. Mr. ************ may alternatively provide us with a Federal Trade Commission Identity Theft Affidavit (“FTC Affidavit”). Upon receipt of the requested documentation, we will further investigate his allegation. If it is determined that this lease is in fact fraudulent, we will terminate this lease. Absent proof of fraudulent activity, we will not terminate the lease.
Additionally, Mr. ************ has stated “[He] just want this emails from [Acima] to stop...” We placed a do-no-contact order on Mr. ************’s lease. He will not receive further communication from Acima.
As we are awaiting additional documentation, we consider this complaint closed. Mr. ************ may contact Acima customer service department at ###-###-#### with any additional questions.
Customer Answer
Date: 03/26/2024
Better Business Bureau:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID ********, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me.
Sincerely,
***** ************Initial Complaint
Date:03/22/2024
Type:Service or Repair IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
My first hand experience with Acima (leasing option) horrible. I bought a sectional for $1294.00 quote me this couch is not worth more than that. How ever I went through with the early pay off option within 90 days. I never missed a payment at which I was paying additional $238-300 each paycheck/ month on top of them taking out pre-paid payment twice a month. I didn’t realize my 90 days was up I’m 11 days shy from having it paid off as we speak today all I had left was LEGIT $174 + plus tax now that I unfortunately missed the 90 day period because I have a BUSY BUSY life I had no reminders saying I was close to my “90 day early pay off or I would’ve paid it completely off” the guys in customer service said “did you read the lease agreement I said yes he said that was your first reminder” customer support had no sympathy and my whole situation I get that people have busy life’s I get emails from them asking if I like the app or other clearance items” but nothing about my 90 day trail period being close to over felt vulnerable and taking advantage of I have a lawyer in mind that I am going to take this to court because there is no reason for me to pay $1092 + tax after my 90 day period the couch of purchase was only $1294. NOT only this is not a loan so how can they make you pay additional interest.
So yes horrible mistake and I highly don’t recommend this company to anyone I have $3000 dollars in store credit I was going to use to purchase other items however I am going to take my customer service some other place. This is far from over
This is unreasonable interest charges that are not declared in the agreement !!!
Customer support was very disrespectful to me and told me that if it was him he would’ve paid it off, considering I am buying a house and I have children it’s not that easy I do not need additional charges added to my account I was NEVER behind or late on ANY paymentsBusiness Response
Date: 03/28/2024
Acima Leasing (hereinafter “we,” “us,” and “our”) received the complaint filed by Ms. ******** **** through the Better Business Bureau on March 22, 2024. We have reached out directly to Ms. **** and resolved this matter. If she has additional questions, she may contact our customer service department at ###-###-####.Initial Complaint
Date:03/22/2024
Type:Sales and Advertising IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
They allowed someone else to walk into a store and purchase a cell phone for well over $1000 u see my name when I finally find out I recover the phone and attempt to return it and they said they would cut all leasing cost and I could pay 236 in theee payments and it would be settled I agreed they then charged me two months after it was paid off another $117 and then told me I still owed 500 something dollars moreBusiness Response
Date: 03/22/2024
Acima Leasing (hereinafter “we,” “us,” “our”) received the complaint filed by Ms. ***** ***** on March 22, 2024.
Ms. ***** alleges someone utilized her identity to obtain a lease with Acima Leasing. If Ms. ***** believes this lease was created as a result of identity theft, we request that she file a police report and/or a Federal Trade Commission Identity Theft Affidavit and provide a copy of the same to Acima at ***************. Upon receipt of this documentation, we will investigate and if the lease is determined to be a result of fraud, we will terminate the lease. Absent receipt of the necessary documentation, we will not terminate the lease.
We confirm Ms. ***** previously reached a settlement agreement with Acima. Her final settlement payment failed, and as such the settlement was cancelled. We confirm we offered a settlement of $442.20 plus tax. We reviewed her lease and confirmed we are able to grant Ms. *****’ request to extend her prior settlement offer. Please note, Acima is not obligated to offer settlements, however, we may do so as a courtesy, to assist customers in obtaining ownership of the property. Ms. ***** may pay $221.19 plus tax, after which we will close the lease as settled. She may reach out to our recovery department at ###-###-#### to exercise this option. She has until April 5, 2024, to exercise this option, after which this settlement amount will no longer be available.
As we have granted Ms. *****' desired request and provided steps whereby she may pursue fraud actions if desired, we consider this complaint closed. If Ms. ***** has any questions or wishes to utilize the settlement offer, she may contact our recovery department at ###-###-####.Initial Complaint
Date:03/22/2024
Type:Order IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
On 01-10-2024 I purchased 4 tires and signed a rental agreement with Acima. The total price was $1.400 and $750.00 early pay off within 90 days. I signed to agree to have them automatically withdraw bi-weekly payments of $55.05. I was also making extra payments biweekly to be able to pay it off within the 90 days. I am currently within 13 days left of the 90 days, and the early pay off amount is $419.00. When I went to make an extra payment yesterday of $100.00, I noticed that on 3 different occasions they only auto withdrew $2.05 for the bi-weekly payment. They left me 3 payments behind on the 90 days. My balance should only be $187 at this point but it isn't. When I contacted them yesterday, 03-21-2024 about the 3 missing payments, they informed me that when I made extra payments, they counted as my next payment due. I asked if that is in the contract that I signed stating if I made extra payments, they would go towards my next payment. They said no!. This company broke/breached on their own terms of their contract. I do not believe I should be responsible for the 3 payments that they did not take when I signed the agreement for them to auto draft the bi-weekly payment and I was making extra payments only for it to penalize me and make it impossible to do an early payoff. I would like to have this paid off by April 4, 2024 which is the 90 day early payoff date at the accurate balance due of $187.00.Business Response
Date: 03/25/2024
Acima (hereinafter “we,” “us,” “our” and “Acima”) received the complaint filed by Ms. ******* ***** through the Better Business Bureau on March 22, 2024. We investigated this complaint and prepared the following response.
As a courtesy to our customers, we offer two Early Purchase Options (“EPOs”); each of which reduces the cost of ownership and terminates the Agreement earlier than the rental period contained within. The first EPO is a 90-day EPO wherein Ms. ***** may obtain ownership of the Property by paying $725.00 before tax by April 9, 2024. The second EPO stipulates that Ms. ***** can obtain ownership at any point after the first 90 days by paying a lump sum payment equivalent to 50% of any remaining renewal payments.
Ms. ***** states, that “on 3 different occasions [Acima] only auto withdrew $2.05 for the bi-weekly payment.” Pursuant to paragraph 2 of the rental-purchase agreement (the “Agreement”) titled, “Payments” Ms. ***** authorized Acima to automatically draft the regular rental purchase payment amounts by their due date. If these rental payments are paid in advance, Acima is not authorized to continue drafting advance rental payments. As such, payments larger than the rental amount needed will pre-pay upcoming rent payments. Upon the clearing of the one-time payments, Acima is prohibited from withdrawing the minimum renewal payments until the prepayment expires. Therefore, we deny the claim that Acima breached the Agreement, and confirm all payments were drafted in accordance with the Agreement.
At any time, Ms. ***** can access her lease through our online customer portal or by calling Acima’s Customer Service Department to exercise her 90-Day EPO. We would like to advise Ms. ***** that there is an extension of the 90-day EPO that will be available to Ms. *****. This option allows customers to utilize the 90-Day EPO for an additional seven days for a $100.00 fee. Please note, that Acima is not obligated to offer an extension under the Agreement; we provide this as a courtesy to help customers obtain ownership of the property early. Ms. ***** must call into our Customer Service Department to utilize this option, if she opts in.
Ms. *****‘s desired resolution was for a “Billing Adjustment.” We will not grant this request. We confirm we acted in accordance with the Agreement. We hope this explanation clarifies the purchase terms of Ms. *****’s Agreement and her responsibilities thereunder. If she has any questions or wishes to explore purchase or termination options available to her, we encourage her to contact our customer service department at ###-###-####.Initial Complaint
Date:03/21/2024
Type:Billing IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
I financed furniture through Acima over a year ago through Ashley Furniture. An employee or someone created another account in my name. They have been billing me since March of last year.Business Response
Date: 03/22/2024
Acima Leasing (hereinafter “we,” “us,” “our”) received the complaint filed by Ms. ****** ****** on March 21, 2024, regarding her entering into two rental-purchase agreements (the “Agreements”) with Acima. Pursuant to our records, Ms. ****** applied for our services on March 11, 2023, and again on April 8, 2023. After each application, Acima purchased property Ms. ****** selected from Ashley Homestore (the “Retailer”), and Ms. ****** entered into the Agreements with Acima, agreeing to rent the selected property until she completed all scheduled rent payments, exercised an early-purchase option, or terminated the Agreements by returning the property to Acima.
Upon review of Ms. ******’s leases, we note that she contacted us directly on March 21, 2024, and indicated she had paid the Retailer directly for the property. Please note, Acima is the owner of the property, as we purchased it on her behalf from the Retailer. If Ms. ****** paid the Retailer directly, we ask that she provide proof of payment so we can make the necessary adjustments on her leases.
As of today’s writing, Ms. ****** has two purchase options available to her for the Agreements. She may purchase the first rental-purchase agreement by making a lump sum payment of $21.60 before tax, on or before March 26, 2024. If she continues her regular rent payment schedule, her final rent payment will process automatically on March 28, 2024, and she will automatically obtain ownership of the property that is the subject matter of the first rental-purchase agreement upon successful completion of this payment. She may purchase the second rental-purchase agreement by making a lump sum payment of $130.32 on or before March 30, 2024, or she may continue her regularly scheduled rent renewal payments. There are two remaining scheduled rent renewal payments for the second rental-purchase agreement, the first will process on April 1, 2024, for $110.34 before tax, and the second will process on April 15, 2024, for $100.19 before tax, upon successful completion of these rent payments she will automatically obtain ownership of the property that is the subject matter of the second rental-purchase agreement.
We hope this response assists Ms. ****** with the steps she may take to provide proof of her claim, and her remaining obligations to the Agreements she entered. If she has any additional questions, she may contact our recovery department at ###-###-####.Initial Complaint
Date:03/20/2024
Type:Billing IssuesStatus:ResolvedMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
The date of this transaction started on on Feb. 16. They stated that I did not make my payment. I have proof that my payment was made on that date and was never late. My account was set up on reoccurring so after my payment was made and should have been credited to the account they tried to take the payment again which it failed. I requested that they make this right. They did credit my account for 25.00 but now they are trying to say my account has been past due since Feb. 16th on the app its saying, "your account is not past due", you owe 25.00 the nsf fee plus tax." I spoke to 3 reps two of which were so called supervisors the last so called supervisor was Hosea/Jose. It is no telling how many people they have charged nsf fees for accounts that were paid as they should of been due to Acimas system not capturing payments made to cancel out reoccurring scheduled payments. I pay my bill on time bi weekly and have never been late with a payment. Their system is not updated to show payments that have been made before the scheduled date which should cancel out the scheduled payment. I need to find out how many others have been affected by this system and what they were charged. They have sent my account to the collections department for that 25.00 fee. I have never been late and I am unsure how I have a late fee. Even there account says i have not been late but they are still trying to charge me a late fee and they have sent my account to their collections department. I think any business that uses them for financing should be aware of how they are treating good customers. This has to be resolved with a CEO not these regular workers who are doing what they are told this needs to be corrected from higher ups and the system needs to be upgraded. I need this issue resolved asap. This is one of the worse experiences I have had with a company. I thought my issues was resolved but when Acima added the credit it made matters worse.Business Response
Date: 03/26/2024
Acima Leasing (hereinafter “us,” “we,” “our,” “Acima”) received the complaint filed by Ms. ******* through the Better Business Bureau on March 20, 2024. We investigated her complaint and prepared the following response.
Ms. ******* alleges Acima’s system does not capture payments made to cancel out scheduled rent payments. Pursuant to paragraph 16 of the lease-purchase agreement (the “Agreement”) titled “Payment Authorization,” to modify the payment authorization we must receive the request at least 3 business days before the payment is scheduled to be made or far enough in advance for us to reasonably act on it. We confirm Ms. ******* did not make her rent payments far enough in advance for us to cancel the authorized automatic withdrawal. As such, the rent payments were attempted and failed, thus incurring a $25.00 NSF fee as outlined in the Agreement.
We confirm our system operated as intended. Nevertheless, we granted her request for a billing adjustment. If Ms. ******* has additional questions, she may contact our customer service department at ###-###-####.Customer Answer
Date: 03/26/2024
Better Business Bureau:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID ********, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me.
Sincerely,
******** *******Initial Complaint
Date:03/20/2024
Type:Customer Service IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
I am not liable for this debt with Acima, I do not have a contract with ACIMA DIGITAL FKA SIMPLE, they did not provide me with the original contract as i requested.Business Response
Date: 03/22/2024
Acima Leasing (hereinafter us, we, our and Acima) received the complaint filed by Mr. ******* Brown through the Better Business Bureau (BBB) on March 21, 2024. We investigated his complaint and prepared the following response.
************** alleges [he does] not have a contract with Acima. Pursuant to our records, on January 11, 2021, ************** entered an independent third-party retailer Bebo's Wheels & Tires (the Retailer) located in *******, ********. While with the Retailer, he applied and was approved for our leasing services. On that same date, ************** selected tires and rims (the Property). Acima purchased the Property, and ************** electronically entered into a rental-purchase agreement (the Agreement) wherein he agreed to rent the Property from Acima. Alternatively, he could execute any other early purchase or termination option outlined within the Agreement.
************** claims [he] not liable for the debt with Acima. He does not provide further explanation as to why he believes he is not liable for this debt. We have reason to believe that this lease belongs to **************. Nonetheless, if ************** is alleging identity theft, we request that he provide us with any documentation substantiating his allegation, including a full police report, at ******************************* Upon receipt of the requested documentation, we will further investigate his allegation. If it is determined that in fact it is a fraudulent account, we will terminate this account and remove all reporting of it from the credit bureau. Absent proof of fraudulent activity, we will not terminate the account or remove our reporting. We paused our reporting of this lease for 30 days while we await the requested information. Please note, Experian is the only national credit bureau to which Acima reports.
************** claims [Acima] did not supply [him] with the original contract as requested. We reviewed his account and we do not have a record of him requesting the original Agreement. Furthermore, the Agreement is accessible by logging into our customer portal at https//:*********************************. This option has been consistently available to **************.
As we are awaiting additional documentation, we consider this complaint closed. If ************** has any questions or concerns in regard to his Agreement or would like to explore any purchase, termination, or settlement options that *** be available to him, he *** contact our recovery department by phone at **************.
Customer Answer
Date: 03/22/2024
Date: _2/22/2024
To Whom it May ********************** letter is being sent to you in response to a notice sent to me on
_ (02/22/2024) regarding account #_
Be advised this is not a refusal to pay, but a notice sent pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 USC 1692g stating your claim is disputed and validation is requested.
This is not a request for "verification" or proof of my mailing address, but a request for VALIDATION made pursuant to the above-named Title and Section. I respectfully request your offices provide me with evidence that I have any legal obligation to pay you, including the following documentation:
1. Agreement with the creditor that authorizes you to collect on this alleged debt;
The agreement bearing my signature stating that I have agreed to assume the debt;
???Valid copies of the debt agreement stating the amount of the debt and interest charges;
???Proof that the Statute of Limitations has not expired;
???Complete payment history on this account along with an accounting of all additional charges being assessed;
???Proof that you are licensed to collect in my state; and
???Your license numbers and Registered Agent.
At this time, I will also inform you that if your offices have reported invalidated information to any of the 3 major credit bureaus (Equifax, Experian, or TransUnion) this action may constitute fraud under both Federal and State Laws. Due to this fact, if any negative **** is found on any of my credit reports by your company or the company that you represent, I will not hesitate in bringing legal action against you and your client for the following: Violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and Defamation of Character.
If your office fails to reply to this debt validation letter within thirty (30) days from the date of your receipt, all instances related to this account must be immediately deleted and completely removed from my credit file. Moreover, all future attempts to collect on the said debt must be ceased.
Your non-compliance with my request will also be construed as an absolute waiver of all claims to enforce the debt against me and your implied agreement to compensate me for court costs and attorney fees if I am forced to bring this matter before a judge.
Sincerely,
(Debtor Signature) ******* Brown
(Debtor Printed Name) ******* BrownBusiness Response
Date: 03/26/2024
Acima Leasing (hereinafter we, us, our and Acima) received the rejection of a complaint filed by Ms. ******* Brown through the Better Business Bureau on March 25, 2024. We investigated her rejection and provide the following response.
Acima is not subject to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) as we are not a third-party debt collector, nor have we sold Ms. ****** lease to a third party. Thus, the cited code 15 USC 1692g does not apply to us. However, we do provide verification of debt as a matter of best practice. We provide the following information to assist Ms. ****** understanding of the lease-purchase agreement (the Agreement) she entered with Acima. We have reached out separately to ************** and provided her a copy of the signed Agreement and a statement of payments, detailing her payment history. These documents serve to verify her lease and the payment obligations therein.
************** requests that all future attempts to collect on the said debt must [sic] cease. As per her request, we placed a do-not-contact order on her lease. She will not receive any further unprompted communication from Acima.
If ************** has any questions or concerns regarding her Agreement or wants to explore any purchase, termination, or settlement options available to her, she may contact our recovery department by phone at **************.Initial Complaint
Date:03/20/2024
Type:Billing IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
When I purchased the furniture from Ashley Furniture the bill came out to 1633.98 but Acima is showing it up as 1729 dollars. Then also it is now showing 2095 dollars. I would like this corrected so i can make a payment before I proceed.Business Response
Date: 03/27/2024
Acima Leasing (hereinafter “we,” “us,” “our”) received the complaint filed by Mr. **** ******* on March 20, 2024, through the Better Business Bureau (“BBB”). We reviewed his complaint and the lease, and reached out to the retailer directly regarding the original invoice amount. We confirm the retailer accurately provided Acima Leasing an invoice amount of $1,729.98 at the time the lease was created. This is the amount Mr. ******* would have paid before tax had he purchased the property from the retailer directly, and is the amount his rental-purchase agreement (the “Agreement”), rent payment amounts and purchase option amounts were created from. If Mr. ******* has an invoice from the retailer reflecting a different amount, we ask that he provide a copy to us via the BBB complaint portal, or to our resolutions team at ********************* so we can investigate further.
Mr. ******* also references an amount of $2,095.00 in his complaint. To provide clarification, Mr. ******* has a 90-Day early-purchase option available to him in the amount of $1986.58 before tax, which he may utilize on or before June 17, 2024, to obtain ownership of the leased property. Mr. ******* also has another early-purchase option available to him at any time after the first 90 days, and a termination option should he no longer wish to obtain ownership of the property. We confirm a copy of the Agreement was provided to Mr. ******* in full prior to his signing. Mr. ******* may also view a copy of the Agreement at any time by logging into his customer account located at ****************************
If Mr. ******* has any additional questions, we encourage him to reach out to our customer service department at ###-###-####.
Acima is BBB Accredited.
This business has committed to upholding the BBB Standards for Trust.
Why choose a BBB Accredited Business?BBB Business Profiles may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.
BBB Business Profiles are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. BBB asks third parties who publish complaints, reviews and/or responses on this website to affirm that the information provided is accurate. However, BBB does not verify the accuracy of information provided by third parties, and does not guarantee the accuracy of any information in Business Profiles.
When considering complaint information, please take into account the company's size and volume of transactions, and understand that the nature of complaints and a firm's responses to them are often more important than the number of complaints.
BBB Business Profiles generally cover a three-year reporting period, except for customer reviews. Customer reviews posted prior to July 5, 2024, will no longer be published when they reach three years from their submission date. Customer reviews posted on/after July 5, 2024, will be published indefinitely unless otherwise voluntarily retracted by the user who submitted the content, or BBB no longer believes the review is authentic. BBB Business Profiles are subject to change at any time. If you choose to do business with this company, please let them know that you checked their record with BBB.
As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business. Businesses are under no obligation to seek BBB accreditation, and some businesses are not accredited because they have not sought BBB accreditation. BBB charges a fee for BBB Accreditation. This fee supports BBB's efforts to fulfill its mission of advancing marketplace trust.