Skip to main content

Cookies on BBB.org

We use cookies to give users the best content and online experience. By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to allow us to use all cookies. Visit our Privacy Policy to learn more.

Manage Cookies
Share
Business Profile

Check Cashing Services

Community Choice Financial, Inc.

Complaints

This profile includes complaints for Community Choice Financial, Inc.'s headquarters and its corporate-owned locations. To view all corporate locations, see

Find a Location

Community Choice Financial, Inc. has 1461 locations, listed below.

*This company may be headquartered in or have additional locations in another country. Please click on the country abbreviation in the search box below to change to a different country location.

    Country
    Please enter a valid location.

    Customer Complaints Summary

    • 444 total complaints in the last 3 years.
    • 134 complaints closed in the last 12 months.

    If you've experienced an issue

    Submit a Complaint

    The complaint text that is displayed might not represent all complaints filed with BBB. Some consumers may elect to not publish the details of their complaints, some complaints may not meet BBB's standards for publication, or BBB may display a portion of complaints when a high volume is received for a particular business.

    Sort by

    Complaint status

    Complaint type

    • Initial Complaint

      Date:04/24/2024

      Type:Service or Repair Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      I have a title loan through them and they will not sign the title transfer form in order to get my vehicle licensed in Missouri. They are saying my loan was not done correctly from the start and I either have to pay it off or the branch manager go with me to license it. It has not even been inspected for licensing yet. I didn't have this issue transferring my car over to Missouri. It is not my fault that their representative did not do things correctly and I should be punished for it. I have already paid them 3 times what I borrowed from them. Why should I have to pay off this loan before I can license my motorcycle in Missouri? I only borrowed $3000.00 against the motorcycle. I have never heard of having to pay a loan off before the title can be transferred to another state. My car finance company didn't say it had to be paid off first. The Arkansas title was processed and they were added as lienholder to it. They are telling me the reason for filling out the form **** is that they are afraid they will lose the lien on my bike. I am not trying to get out of the loan I just want to license my bike so I can ride it and maintain it in good working order per the contract.

      Business Response

      Date: 05/01/2024

      *******************

      Thank
      you for the opportunity to respond to the complaint filed by ****** ******** (Complainant).
      TitleMax of Missouri, Inc., DBA TitleMax, appreciates the role of the Better
      Business Bureau in resolving consumer concerns. We are happy to provide this
      response.

      To summarize,
      the Complainant states TitleMax will not sign the title transfer form in order
      to get their vehicle licensed in MO. They claim they were told the loan was not
      done correctly and would have to pay their loan off or have a branch manager go
      with them in order to transfer the title as TitleMax is afraid they would lose
      their lien. They are requesting that their vehicle’s title be transferred to
      the state of MO.

      A review of TitleMax records reveals that
      on July 16, 2022, a Title loan was obtained in the principal amount financed of
      $3,017.00 at a storefront in Jefferson City, MO. The Complainant granted a
      security interest in a 2003 HD Road King with a VIN ending in 706313. The loan
      was contracted to be repaid in 35 monthly payments of $479.83 beginning August
      13, 2022, and a final payment of $474.13 due July 13, 2025. A review of the
      payment history indicates there have been 21 payments made on the loan totaling
      $10,076.43, and the account is current.


      In
      response to the Complainant’s request to get their title transferred to the
      state of MO, we have forwarded their concern to the appropriate department in
      order to assist with this process. We apologize for the poor customer
      experience. Should the Complainant have any additional questions or concerns
      regarding their account, we encourage them to contact TitleMax directly at ###-###-####.

      We
      hope that we have fully addressed the complaint. Should the Complainant or Better Business Bureau require further explanation, we
      may be reached at *****************************

      Sincerely,

      BSG
      – Consumer Complaints
      ** *** ***
      ********** ** *****

      Customer Answer

      Date: 05/02/2024

      I have not heard anything from Titlemax regarding this matter. Therefore I do not consider it resolved. All they would have to so is fill out and sign the form in front of a Notary Public and then let me take it to the Department of Motor Vehicles and register my motorcycle in Missouri. Considering I have made my payments faithfully and my account is current I don't think that is too much to ask of them. They are listed as lienholder on the title now.



      Regards,



      ****** ********

      Business Response

      Date: 05/10/2024

      **********************

      Thank
      you for the opportunity to respond to the rebuttal filed by ****** ******** (Complainant).
      TitleMax of Missouri, Inc., DBA TitleMax, appreciates the role of the Better
      Business Bureau in resolving consumer concerns. We are happy to provide this
      response.

      In response to the Complainant’s concern
      regarding the transfer of title, we are actively providing support to complete the
      transfer of title from AR to MO. The Complainant may contact us directly at **************************** regarding the status.

      We
      hope that we have fully addressed the complaint. Should the Complainant or Better Business Bureau require further explanation, we
      may be reached at *****************************

      Sincerely,

      BSG
      – Consumer Complaints
      ****************
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:04/20/2024

      Type:Service or Repair Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      I took out a 200 dollar loan on 10/19/23. They said the only way to pay was thru ACH. I have made 50 dollar payments since. For 8 months I have paid Over 400 dollars and I owe more then I borrowed still. The interest and ways to pay are predatory. I can't pay anymore than what is aloud. At this rate it will take me a few years to pay it off and thousands of dollars.

      Business Response

      Date: 04/26/2024

      ***** *** ****

      ****** ******** ******
      **** ****** ****
      ********* ** *****

      *** *** ********* ** ********

      *** ******* ********** *****

      Thank
      you for the opportunity to respond to the complaint filed by ******* ****** (Complainant). TitleMax of Kansas dba TitleMax appreciates the
      role of the Better Business Bureau in resolving consumer concerns. We are happy
      to provide this response.

      To summarize, the Complainant states they
      took out a $200.00 loan on October 19, 2023, and has paid $50.00 payments for
      over eight months; however, they still owe more than they’ve borrowed. Their
      desired resolution is a billing adjustment for $400.00.


      A review of TitleMax records reveals that on October 19, 2023, the
      Complainant obtained an Unsecured Line of Credit with a credit limit of $200.00
      at a storefront in Junction City KS, with an initial advance of $200.00. The
      first payment of $41.50 was due on November 23, 2023, and a second payment of
      $60.44 was due on December 21, 2023. A review of the
      payment history indicates there have been six (6) payments made on the loan and the account is current.


      At the
      time of loan origination, the Complainant signed the Unsecured Line of Credit
      Account Opening Disclosures and Account Opening Acknowledgement that clearly
      discloses clearly discloses the annual percentage rate in accordance with the
      Federal Truth-in-Lending Act and Regulation Z. In addition, was provided the
      Unsecured Line of Credit Terms and Conditions. By signing this agreement, the
      Complainant acknowledged their understanding of the terms and conditions of the
      loan.


      As stated
      in their Unsecured Line of Credit Account Opening
      Disclosures and Account Opening Acknowledgement listed under Section F:
      “We
      encourage you to pay more than the Minimum Payment Due to minimize the amount
      of Interest and fees you may incur. You may prepay any outstanding principal
      amount and billed Interest and fees owed on your Account in whole or in part at
      any time without penalty. The Minimum Principal Amount due for each Billing
      Cycle is calculated at the end of each Billing Cycle and will be an amount
      equal to 3% of the ending principal balance for such Billing Cycle.”
      In
      addition, the Complainant receives periodic billing statements that include the
      following statements:
      “Minimum
      Payment Warning: If you make only the minimum payment each period, you will pay
      more in Interest, and it will take you longer to pay off your balance.
      If you
      have agreed to repay amounts owed on your account via Auto Pay, the Minimum
      Payment Due will be debited on the Payment Due Date. To change your Auto Pay
      preferences or cancel Auto Pay, call us at ###-###-####.”


      It is
      important to note that the Complainant has opted to make only the minimum
      payment due each time.


      TitleMax believes that the conditions of
      the loan were clearly disclosed and finds no discrepancy or concern in how the
      transaction was processed, therefore no billing adjustment will be provided at
      this time. TitleMax strives for excellent customer
      service. Therefore, TitleMax remains willing to work with the Complainant to
      repay the balance on the account. We encourage them to contact TitleMax at ###-###-#### to discuss possible repayment options.


      We
      hope that we have fully addressed the complaint. Should the Complainant or Better Business Bureau require further explanation, we
      may be reached at *****************************

      Sincerely,

      BSG
      – Consumer Complaints
      ** *** ***
      ********** ** *****


      Customer Answer

      Date: 05/09/2024

       None of that was explained to me at the time of getting the loan. The only thing that was explained was my first three payments. So all my payments come out on ACH, so what you are saying is I have to go to the store if I want to pay more then the minimum. That was not explained. None of the truth in lending was explained. I pay 50 plus a month and only 5 goes to the principal. Why don't you guys give out paper forms? I can't access my documents online. When I try it always says unavailable. So how am I to go back and look at them. 



      Regards,



      ******* ******

      Business Response

      Date: 05/17/2024

      Thank
      you for the opportunity to respond to the rebuttal filed by ******* ****** (Complainant). TitleMax, a member of Community Choice Financial® family of brands, appreciates the role of the Better Business Bureau in
      resolving consumer concerns. We are happy to provide this response.

      TitleMax reiterates its response in its
      previous correspondence. At the time of loan
      origination, the Complainant signed the Unsecured Line of Credit Account
      Opening Disclosures and Account Opening Acknowledgement that clearly discloses
      clearly discloses the annual percentage rate in accordance with the Federal
      Truth-in-Lending Act and Regulation Z. In addition, was provided the Unsecured
      Line of Credit Terms and Conditions. By signing this agreement,
      the Complainant acknowledged their understanding of the terms and conditions of
      the loan.


      TitleMax believes
      that the conditions of the loan were clearly disclosed and finds no discrepancy
      or concern in how the transaction was processed.

      In response to the Complainant's concerns
      regarding not being able to access their loan documents online, we encourage the
      Complainant to contact TitleMax at ###-###-#### for
      assistance.

      We
      hope that we have fully addressed the complaint. Should the Complainant or Better Business Bureau require further explanation, we
      may be reached at *****************************

      Sincerely,

      BSG
      – Consumer Complaints
      ** *** ***
      ********** ** *****

    • Initial Complaint

      Date:04/11/2024

      Type:Order Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.

      I did the loan in Jan 2024. The loan was $2000. The rep told me “ the easier and more convenient way to pay is through the app and any additional payments would go towards the principle”. This was a deliberate lie!

      My first payment was due in Feb, so I made $295 additional payments in January thinking it was going towards the principle. The I made a $400 payment in Feb and $500 in March. Now I owe $2260.00??? None of that money went towards the principle.

      I called customer service and she informed me that I need to make all these payments in the store and “ tell “ them to put it towards my principle. The customer service rep apologized and told me she wished she never got a lot of these calls, but she does.

      This has devastated my family, put us in a hardship situation. This seems deliberate, to put a person in such a hole they have no choice but to turn over their vehicle.

      If this can’t be resolved Iv been instructed to file a complaint with the CFPB and Arizona Attorney General.

      I believed Title max was there to help me during a rough time, when they waiting to prey and take advantage of people like me who need some help and nowhere else to go.

      Business Response

      Date: 04/16/2024

      *****************

      Thank
      you for the opportunity to respond to the complaint filed by ****** ****** (Complainant). TitleMax of Arizona, Inc., DBA TitleMax, appreciates the role of
      the Better Business Bureau in resolving consumer concerns. We are happy to
      provide this response.

      To summarize, the Complainant states they
      were told that any additional payments they made in the app would go towards
      principal which they claim was a lie. They state they made an additional
      payment of $295.00 in January, $400.00 in February, and a $500.00 payment in
      March and despite that, they still owe $2,260.00.


      A
      review of TitleMax records reveals that on June 2023, the Complainant obtained
      a title loan in the principal amount financed of $400.00 at a storefront in
      Tempe, AZ. The Complainant granted a security interest in a 2008 Chevy Equinox
      with a VIN ending in ******. The loan was contracted to be repaid in 23 monthly
      payments of $69.77, beginning July 20, 2023, and a final payment of $67.27, due
      June 20, 2025. On August 17, 2023, the Complainant made a payment of $60.00 and
      refinanced their existing loan of $107.60, borrowing an additional $600.00. The
      loan was contracted to be repaid in 23 monthly payments of $112.27, beginning
      September 22, 2023, and a final payment of $111.62, due August 22, 2025.

      Between
      September 28, 2023, and December 21, 2023, the Complainant refinanced their
      loan on ten more occasions, borrowing an additional $2,900.00 total. The final
      refinance was completed on December 24, 2023, in which the Complainant made a
      payment of $33.58 and refinanced their loan for the remaining balance of
      $2,271.45, borrowing an additional $125.00. The loan was contracted to be
      repaid in 23 monthly payments of $376.07, beginning January 26, 2024, and a
      final payment of $375.15, due December 26, 2025.

      It
      is important to note that at the time of the loan origination and each
      refinance, the Complainant signed a Secondary Motor Vehicle Finance Transaction
      Contract that clearly disclosed the annual percentage rate, finance charge,
      amount financed, total of payments and the repayment schedule in accordance
      with the Federal Truth-in-Lending Act and Regulation Z. By signing the loan
      agreements, the Complainant acknowledged their understanding of the terms and
      conditions of the loans. In addition, the contract contained the following
      regarding application of payments:


      “Interest;
      Application of Payments; Prepayment: Interest
      will accrue daily on the outstanding principal balance. The interest rate is
      179.8800% per year (which is based on a monthly rate of 14.9900%). Interest
      accrues from the Loan Date until the first to occur of (a) the Loan is paid in
      full, and (b) the day that is 90 days after the final Payment Due Date.
      Interest accrues based on the number of days elapsed over a 365-day year.
      Lender calculates and charges interest, including interest on past due principal,
      under Arizona Revised Statutes § 44-281 et seq. If any finance charge or other
      fee is held invalid, the remainder shall remain in effect. Lender applies
      payments first to unpaid interest, then to fees, and then to unpaid principal.
      The Payment Schedule and Finance Charge above assume that I pay all
      installments in full on the Payment Due Dates. I will owe less interest if I
      pay early or prepay. If I pay late or do not pay in full, I will owe more
      interest. I may prepay this Loan at any time without penalty. “Interest” as
      used in this Contract means the “secondary motor vehicle finance rate” for
      purposes of Arizona Revised Statutes § 44-281 et seq.”

      A review of the payment history on the
      most recent refinance indicates there have been six (6) payments made on the
      loan. In response to the Complainant’s claims that they made an extra of
      $295.00 for the January minimum payment of $376.07, the Complainant paid the
      payment in four separate payments from December 29, 2023, to January 26, 2024,
      totaling $395.00. On February 9, 2024, the Complainant made a payment of
      $500.00, where $253.28 was applied to their loan principal. On March 22, 2024,
      the Complainant made a payment of $400.00 which was applied to interest. The
      Complainant’s account currently has a balance of $2,061.56.


      TitleMax believes that the conditions of
      the loan were clearly disclosed and finds no discrepancy or concern in how the
      transaction was processed. However, TitleMax strives for excellent customer
      service and remains willing to work with the Complainant to assist them in
      paying back their loan. We encourage the Complainant to contact TitleMax at
      ###-###-#### to discuss a mutually agreeable payment arrangement.


      We
      hope that we have fully addressed the complaint. Should the Complainant or Better Business Bureau require further explanation, we
      may be reached at [email protected].

      Sincerely,

      BSG
      – Consumer Complaints
      ** *** ***
      ********** ** *****

    • Initial Complaint

      Date:04/04/2024

      Type:Billing Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.

      *********** 
      I visited the office above on 28 requested loan $1000 to pay electric bill & (illegible) - Application was taken and approved $4000 turned over my title. Requested copy of my application for schedule of payments and for him to correct my address - which was not done … this later on presented I believe a problem…the money was transferred to my ******* ****** ***** account. Paid this loan of on 3/1 4/1093.94 was charged interest customer fees twice.
      2nd (illegible) thing happened I tried to open account on line …had a lot of trouble - had to make a 2hr round trip to their office (as instructed ***** helped me. I was there I requested (illegible) everything was accomplished on 3/7.
      3rd time 3/21 tried to transfer (online) much needed funds to my *** acct - and I got many failed attempted; saying couldn’t verify information ( called customer service ###-###-####) talked to representative @ 6:42 pm…I was told it was no solution for my problem - this don’t make any sense. I was told to make the 2 hr trip to office.
      This doesn’t make any sense…this is why I downloaded mobile app – this sounds like a scam.Online my fees are much lower - when I go in office I’m paying twice. Of course this is costing me in other ways also. 
      Thank you very much for helping me with these concerns. 
      Sincerely,
      ***** *******
      * * *** **
      ** **** ** *****
      ###-###-####

      Business Response

      Date: 04/09/2024

      *****************

      Thank
      you for the opportunity to respond to the complaint filed by ***** ******* (Complainant). TMX Finance of Tennessee, Inc., DBA TitleMax, appreciates the
      role of the Better Business Bureau in resolving consumer concerns. We are happy
      to provide this response.

      To
      summarize, the Complainant states the Complainant states their address was not
      corrected when requested and believes this later presented a problem. They
      state they paid off their loan on March 1, 2024, and were charged interest
      customer fees twice. In addition, state they have had issues online and had to
      make two-hour trips to the office. They claim that online, their fees are much
      lower and when they pay in the office, they pay twice.

      A review
      of TitleMax records reveals that on February 8, 2024, the Complainant obtained
      a Line of Credit with a credit limit of $4,000.00 at a storefront in Bristol,
      TN, with an initial advance of $1,000.00. The Complainant granted a security
      interest in a 2014 Ram 1500 with a VIN ending in ******. The first payment of $76.97 was due on March 7, 2024, and a second
      payment of $71.83 was due on April 7, 2024.


      A review of the payment history reveals
      the Complainant paid their balance off for their initial advance on March 1,
      2024, in the amount of $1,093.94. On March 7, 2024, the Complainant requested a
      draw on their loan of $800.00, but paid off the balance of $864.91, on March
      26, 2024. They requested a draw of $1,000.00 on April 1, 2024, which was funded
      via card.


      At origination, the Complainant acknowledged
      the terms and conditions of the loan by signing the Secured Line of Credit
      Account Opening Disclosures and Account Opening Acknowledgement.  The loan agreement clearly discloses the
      interest rate in accordance with the Federal Truth in Lending Act and
      Regulation. It is also important to note that a TitleMax employee explained the
      terms and conditions to the Complainant including, but not limited to, the
      application of a customary fee. In addition, the Complainant is also provided
      with a detailed monthly statement that explains the fees and charges incurred
      on the account during the billing cycle, and includes information about the
      account balance, the minimum payment required and the payment’s due date.

      Please note that the Complainant is
      attempting to obtain a cash advance under the TN license. Hover, since the
      Complainant’s geolocation is in a different state from the loan origination,
      they are unable to request cash advances online and must do so in person. updates, and discuss what each of us are
      currently working on.

      TitleMax believes that the conditions
      of the loan were clearly disclosed and finds no discrepancy or concern in how
      the transaction was processed. We encourage the Complainant to call Customer
      Service at ###-###-#### for questions regarding their account, including
      address change requests.

      We
      hope that we have fully addressed the complaint. Should the Complainant or Better Business Bureau require further explanation, we
      may be reached at *****************************

      Sincerely,

      BSG
      – Consumer Complaints
      ** *** ***
      ********** ** *****

      Customer Answer

      Date: 04/24/2024

      ************** 

      To Whom It May Concern:

      I am very sorry about these problems - but the records show that it's not my fault - I'm just trying to live like everyone else in this country - just trying to pay my bills. But due to someone entering the incorrect address, etc., trying to do business online it was made very difficult, causing other issues, it should be a smooth transaction.

      Paragraph 6 letter dated April 9, message from the business. This is very untrue, I went into the above location with these issues. A person by name of ***** helped me. we did trouble shooting, everything was set up online on my phone, transaction was done, everything verified. The problem I'm having online when I attempt there always is verification so this causes me to have to go in office and the fess are double. This is the first time I've heard of geo location issue. They NEVER said that was the problem.

       Thank you,

      ***** *******

      * * *** **

      ** ***** ** *****

      ************

       

    • Initial Complaint

      Date:03/20/2024

      Type:Billing Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      I went into a loan with Titlemax on Oct 28, 2021. When I got the loan it was explained to me that I would just need to make my monthly payments. What I did not know is that those payments were for interest only and nothing went to principle. After speaking to another representative in now March 2024, She stated I could be paying on the loan forever unless I paid over my monthly payments. My originated pay off was $2,039.34. I updated the loan and now my payoff is $$2,588.64.

      I have been paying interest since 2021. I am sure I have paid the value of the loan as well as my 2009 sonata over that period of time. I am requesting that this loan be considered paid and my title returned to me.

      Business Response

      Date: 03/26/2024

      *******************:

      Thank
      you for the opportunity to respond to the complaint filed by ******** ******** (Complainant). TitleMax of Texas, Inc., DBA TitleMax, appreciates the role of
      the Better Business Bureau in resolving consumer concerns. We are happy to
      provide this response.

      To summarize, the Complainant states that
      when they got their loan, it was explained to them that they would just need to
      make the monthly payments. They did not know those payments were for interest
      only and nothing went to the principal. They have been paying interest since
      2021, and request the loan be considered paid as well as receive their title
      back.


      TitleMax
      of Texas, Inc. is a credit services organization (“CSO”) and credit access
      business registered and licensed under Texas law. TitleMax assists consumers in obtaining motor vehicle title
      loans from third-party lenders and is not a lender in Texas. TitleMax charges
      a CSO fee in the amount permitted by Texas law.

      A
      review of TitleMax records reveals that on July 29, 2022, the Complainant
      obtained a CSO loan with NCP Finance Limited Partnership in the principal
      amount financed of $1,733.00 at a storefront in Plano, TX. The Complainant
      granted a security interest in a 2009 Hyundai Sonata with a VIN ending in
      ******. The loan was contracted to be repaid in full in the amount of $2,079.51
      on August 29, 2022. On August 28, 2022, the Complainant made a payment of
      $345.95 and refinanced their existing loan of $1,733.00. The loan was
      contracted to be repaid in full in the amount of $2,079.51, on September 28,
      2022.

      Between September 20, 2022, and January
      20, 2024, the Complainant refinanced their loan on twelve more occasions,
      borrowing an additional $658.00 total. The 14th and final refinance
      was completed on March 20, 2024, in which the Complainant made a payment of
      $550.00 and refinanced their loan for the remaining balance of $2,038.64. The
      loan is contracted to be repaid in full in the amount of $2,446.26, on April 20,
      2024.
      At
      the time of loan origination and refinance, the Complainant signed a Promissory
      Note as well as the Credit Services Contract and Security Agreement that
      clearly disclosed the annual percentage rate, finance charge, amount financed,
      total of payments and the repayment schedule in accordance with the Federal
      Truth in Lending Act and Regulation Z. By signing the Promissory Note and
      Credit Services Contract and Security Agreement, the Complainant acknowledged
      their understanding of the terms and conditions of the loans.

      It is important to
      note that Title Max encourages customers to use this product as a short-term
      financial solution. The balance may be paid back at any time with no penalty
      for early payoff. Further, customers may cancel the agreement by returning the
      check by which TitleMax disbursed the loan proceeds or an equivalent amount of
      cash to us by the close of business on the business day following the date of
      the agreement.

      TitleMax
      believes that the conditions of the loan were clearly disclosed and finds no
      discrepancy or concern in how the transaction was processed. As such, the loan
      will not be considered paid in full at this time. The Complainant is invited to
      contact TitleMax at ###-###-#### for any questions
      or concerns regarding their account.

      We
      hope that we have fully addressed the complaint. Should the Complainant or Better Business Bureau require further explanation, we
      may be reached at *****************************

      Sincerely,

      BSG
      – Consumer Complaints
      ** *** ***
      ********** ** *****

      Customer Answer

      Date: 04/04/2024

      the information is not what was explained to me when I signed up. At this point the car has been paid for over and over again. While I understand this is supposed to be a short term option, the conditions were not explained clearly or else this loan wouldn't be in existence for me and my family. Please reconsider as we have been paying on this for almost 2 years. 



      Regards,



      ******** ********
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:03/18/2024

      Type:Customer Service Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.

      I am dyslexic, autistic, and have ADHD. By law I don't have to disclose that; however I know myself well enough to know that I need to ask lots of questions before signing anything.

      I thought I asked the right questions when I went in for the loan and sought clarification in the way of dozens of questions. I'm not an ignorant person, but I am aware of my needs, so I feel I did my due diligence to seek information.


      I understood on signing that I would be making payments on the principal of my loan with, of course, hefty interest. I thought the final balloon payment would only The simple balance.

      When I called to make my final payment, i was told that I had paid $2000 to nothing, and I owed more than the original loan.


      I feel taken advantage of, and I feel tricked into entering these terms. Whether or not this was intentional, I am afraid for others who may not completely comprehend what they're signing even after research and inquiry.



      I am not looking for extra compensation, but for my payments to go to the principal so that I may sever my relationship with Title Max



      Business Response

      Date: 03/22/2024

      ******************

      Thank
      you for the opportunity to respond to the complaint filed by ****** ***** (Complainant). TitleMax of Texas, Inc., DBA TitleMax, appreciates the role of
      the Better Business Bureau in resolving consumer concerns. We are happy to
      provide this response.

      To summarize, the Complainant states they
      feel taken advantage of and tricked into the loan terms. They request a billing
      adjustment for their payments to go to the principal.


      TitleMax
      of Texas, Inc. is a credit services organization (“CSO”) and credit access
      business registered and licensed under Texas law. TitleMax assists consumers in obtaining motor vehicle title
      loans from third-party lenders and is not a lender in Texas. TitleMax charges
      a CSO fee in the amount permitted by Texas law.

      A review
      of TitleMax records reveals that on October 6, 2023, the Complainant obtained a
      CSO loan with Ivy Funding Company, LLC in the principal amount financed of
      $2,600.00 at a storefront in El Paso, TX. The Complainant granted a security
      interest in a 2017 Chevrolet Spark with a VIN ending in ******. The loan was
      contracted to be repaid in five (5) payments with the first payment being
      $382.92, due November 3, 2023, and the following three (3) payments in the
      amount of $413.70, due monthly beginning December 3, 2023, and a final fifth
      payment of $413.70 representing the final CSO fee and $2,705.59 representing
      the principal and lender interest, due March 3, 2024.


      A review of the payment history indicates
      there have been four (4) payments made on the loan. When the payment was not
      made on March 3, 2024, the account entered a past due status. The Complainant
      currently has a past due balance of $3,262.35.


      It
      is important to note that at the time of the loan origination, the Complainant
      signed a Promissory Note that clearly disclosed the annual percentage rate,
      finance charge, amount financed, total of payments and the repayment schedule
      in accordance with the Federal Truth-in-Lending Act and Regulation Z. In
      addition, signed a Credit Services Contract and Security Agreement. By signing
      the Promissory Note and Credit Services Contract and Security Agreement, the
      Complainant acknowledged their understanding of the terms and conditions of the
      loans.

      In
      response to the claim the Complainant was allegedly taken advantage of,
      TitleMax is committed to treating its valued customers
      in a fair, honest, and transparent manner. To honor that commitment, TitleMax reasonably ensures that its development, delivery, and
      servicing of products will not result in an act or practice that is unfair,
      deceptive, or abusive.

      TitleMax
      believes that the conditions of the loan were clearly disclosed and finds no
      discrepancy or concern in how the transaction was processed. TitleMax strives
      for excellent customer service and remains willing to work with the Complainant
      to assist them in paying back their loan. We encourage the Complainant to
      contact TitleMax at ###-###-#### to arrange a mutually acceptable repayment
      arrangement for this account.

      We
      hope that we have fully addressed the complaint. Should the Complainant or Better Business Bureau require further explanation, we
      may be reached at *****************************

      Sincerely,

      BSG
      – Consumer Complaints
      ** *** ***
      ********** ** *****

      Customer Answer

      Date: 03/27/2024

       Again, I signed a document under terms which I understood as reading one way, and those terms are not what are occurring now.  Once I addressed my concerns, to me the individual who took my call should have explained and helped me come up with a solution to this. To me, allowing this misunderstanding without remedy is ableist and deceptive. 

      Additionally, I have the cognitive capacity to read through documents and seek information, which I did, which is why this was so shocking to me to begin with. 

      I will seek further legal action if this matter is not resolved, as this puts me in further debt than when I originally went to Title Max to resolve.  I would like to please see my file closed with payments equal to the amount I paid and I would like to see further safeguards to prevent deceptive practices, whether or not they were intentional.




      Regards,



      ****** *****

    • Initial Complaint

      Date:03/15/2024

      Type:Order Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.

      My car was repossessed after I defaulted on a title loan. I accepted that. The pay off amount ended up being 2839.21.
      In Nevada you only 10 days to retrieve your vehicle.

      So as I scrambled I was able to get my ex boyfriend and my son to pay this amount. I would use my boyfriends card for 1000.00 and my son would use his bank card to pay the balance. They also stated that there would be a 10 day hold on my car until they received the money which I agreed to.


      I only have two days left and was told I could only pay in cash in the original store. The original store is in Reno NV and I'm in Las Vegas, NV. That's over 400 miles.
      Now who keeps that kind of cash? Of course I would have to pay with a card.


      So I feel they are purposely trying to make me not get my car. And in today's world that is ****** up. I've had a good standing account with them. There was no need for any of this.

      So how am I suppose to get all that cash together and get to Reno? I'm on Social Security and being treated like ******


      Is this what America has become? God help us all.
      Thank you **** ********

      Business Response

      Date: 03/22/2024

      ****************

      Thank
      you for the opportunity to respond to the complaint filed by **** ******** (Complainant). TitleMax of Nevada, Inc., DBA TitleMax, a member of Community
      Choice Financial® family of brands, appreciates the role of the
      Better Business Bureau in resolving consumer concerns. We are happy to provide
      this response.

      To summarize, the Complainant states their
      car was repossessed after they defaulted on a title loan. They were told they
      could only pay in cash at the original store location in Reno, NV, which is
      over 400 miles away. They request to accept a payment using their card to get
      their car back.


      A review of TitleMax records reveals that
      on October 23, 2023, the Complainant obtained a title loan in the principal
      amount financed of $1,700.00 at a storefront in Reno, NV. The Complainant
      granted a security interest in a 2009 Ford Focus with a VIN ending in ******.
      The loan was contracted to be repaid in 6 monthly payments of $442.77,
      beginning November 22, 2023, and final payment of $442.76, due May 20, 2024.
      A review of the payment history indicates
      there has been one (1) payment made on the loan on December 21, 2023. When the
      second scheduled payment was not made on December 22, 2023, the account entered
      a past due status on January 22, 2024. Due to non-payment on March 7, 2024, the
      Complainant’s vehicle was repossessed, the account was assessed a $415.00
      repossession fee, and collection activities commenced as permitted by law. The
      Complainant’s account currently has a total balance of $2,837.21. The
      Complainant can contact TitleMax collections department at ###-###-#### to make
      a payment by card or they may mail a certified check to the store location.
      We
      hope that we have fully addressed the complaint. Should the Complainant or Better Business Bureau require further explanation, we
      may be reached at *****************************

      Sincerely,

      BSG – Consumer Complaints
      ** *** ***
      ********** ** *****

    • Initial Complaint

      Date:03/07/2024

      Type:Service or Repair Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      On 03/7/2024 my card was used for 300 with speedy cash under the name ******* *******. I did not give authorization for my card to be used!!! nor should this person have been able to use a card that’s NOT in there name to process A payment!! My name is ***** ***** I called and spoke to someone and was advised they could not do anything about this transaction. I have called now 6 times and i’m constantly disconnected on and promised a supervisor call back yet NOTHING! The person account y’all paid was ******* ******* social ********* date of birth ***********  She told me she used the card by mistake and immediately asked that the card be refunded. Somebody need to resolve this because I didn’t authorize her to use my card and speedy cash NEVER SPOKE WITH ME to get consistent to use my card for her payment!!!

      Business Response

      Date: 03/12/2024

      *********************

      Thank
      you for the opportunity to respond to the complaint filed by ***** ***** (Complainant). SCIL Texas, Inc., DBA Speedy Cash, a member of Community Choice
      Financial® family of brands, appreciates the role of the Better
      Business Bureau in resolving consumer concerns. We are happy to provide this
      response.

      To summarize, the Complainant states that their
      card was used for a loan payment obtained with Speedy Cash by mistake. They are
      requesting a refund.

      To protect the privacy and confidentiality
      of our customers’ information, we have strict policies in place that prevent us
      from sharing any account-related details or information with unauthorized third
      parties. These policies are designed to safeguard sensitive data and maintain
      compliance with laws and regulations. Therefore, we cannot disclose specific
      account-related details or information to the Complainant as they are not
      listed as an authorized user on any accounts with Speedy Cash.

      However, we recommend the Complainant
      dispute the transaction with their banking institution.

      We
      hope that we have fully addressed the complaint. Should the Complainant or Better Business Bureau require further explanation, we
      may be reached at *****************************

      Sincerely,

      BSG
      – Consumer Complaints
      ** *** ***
      ********** ** *****

    • Initial Complaint

      Date:02/29/2024

      Type:Order Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      I got a title loan and lost my job so I got behind on my payment so they repossessed my truck til I could come up with the money to get it back. But the repo company they hired to repo my truck stole about $400 worth of tools out of the back of my truck and when I called title max to ask for a phone number to get ahold of them to ask about my tools and other belonging they took they told me they didn't have a working number for them. Now no one can tell me how to get my tools back.

      Business Response

      Date: 03/06/2024

      Thank
      you for the opportunity to respond to the complaint filed by ***** ******* (Complainant). TMX Finance of Tennessee,
      Inc., DBA TitleMax, appreciates the role of the Better Business Bureau in
      resolving consumer concerns. We are happy to provide this response.

      To summarize, the
      Complainant states that the tow company used to repossess their vehicle stole
      $400.00 worth of tools from the back of the truck. When calling TitleMax for a
      phone number, they were told they did not have a working phone number for them.

      A review
      of TitleMax records reveals that on February 9, 2023, the Complainant obtained
      a Line of Credit with a credit limit of $800.00 at a storefront in Milan, TN,
      with an initial advance of $800.00. The Complainant granted a security interest
      in a 2001 Chevrolet Tahoe with a VIN ending in ******. The first payment of
      $104.48 was due on March 15, 2023, and a second payment of $167.82 was due on
      April 15, 2023. Due to non-payment on January 24, 2024, the vehicle was
      repossessed, and a Notice to Sell was mailed to the Complainant the same day.
      Upon payment in the amount of $423.00, the vehicle was returned to the
      Complainant on February 9, 2024. A review of the payment history on the
      most recent refinance indicates there have been seven (7) payments made on the
      loan.

      In response to the
      Complainant’s claims of property theft, we urge them to direct their claim to
      Keltic Adjusters which is the recovery company that was utilized, reachable at
      ###-###-####.

      We hope that we
      have fully addressed the complaint. Should the Complainant or Better Business Bureau require further explanation, we
      may be reached at *****************************

      Sincerely,

      BSG
      – Consumer Complaints

      Customer Answer

      Date: 03/06/2024

      I've looked up the name of the business and can not find any company under that name and have tried that number since I got the truck back. I called Milan Title Max January 24 the day it got repossessed and told them I had $400 worth of tools along with other personal belongings. 




      Regards,



      ***** *******

    • Initial Complaint

      Date:02/14/2024

      Type:Order Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      I’ve been paying back a loan using my title . I have a 2007 Chrysler 300 I borrowed 2518.00 the payoff on my contract is 2845.08 . I’ve been paying 350.00 to 300.00 on this loan for over a year. I’ve exceeded the payoff amount. According to the representative I owe over 2000.00 dollars. Over a years period and counting with no missed payments or late payments is this behavior legal? I’ve asked the representative of TitleMax to give me the numeric amount paid in on this loan I was told it would take some time for this request. I think I’ve paid over 3600.00 concerning this loan. The Representative I talked to on 02/14/2024 at approximately 2:50 pm name is Tabitha.

      Business Response

      Date: 02/20/2024

      February 20, 2024

      Better
      Business Bureau
      1169
      Dublin Road
      Columbus,
      OH 43215

      RE: BBB Complaint ID ********

      BBB
      Dispute Resolution Team:

      Thank
      you for the opportunity to respond to the complaint filed by ******* ***** (Complainant).
      TitleMax of Georgia, Inc., DBA TitleMax, appreciates the role of the Better
      Business Bureau in resolving consumer concerns. We are happy to provide this
      response.

      To summarize, the Complainant states that
      they borrowed $2,518.00 with a payoff on their contract of $2,845.08 for their
      title on their 2007 Chrysler 300. They state that they have been paying $300.00
      to $350.00 on this loan for over a year and have exceeded the payoff amount.
      The Complainant states that according to the representative they owe over
      $2,000.00. They are asking if this behavior is legal. The Complainant stated
      that they requested the numeric amount paid on this loan and were told the
      request would take some time.
      A review of TitleMax records reveals that
      on October 31, 2022, the Complainant obtained a Pawn Transaction in the
      principal amount financed of $2,518.00 at a storefront in Swainsboro, GA. The
      Complainant granted a security interest in a 2007 Chrysler 300 with a VIN
      ending in 748310. The pawn transaction was contracted to be repaid in full in
      the amount of $2,845.08 on November 30, 2022. A review of the payment history
      indicates there have been 16 payments made on the pawn transaction in the total
      of $5,143.53 and 16 extensions requested. The Complainant currently has a
      balance of $2,338.03.
      At the time of pawn transaction origination,
      the Complainant signed a Pawn Transaction Disclosure Statement and Security
      Agreement that clearly disclosed the annual percentage rate, finance charge,
      amount financed, total of payments and the repayment schedule in accordance
      with the Federal Truth in Lending Act and Regulation Z. In addition, the
      agreement includes notices on Extension and
      Continuation which states: “The initial term of the Pawn is 30 days, and the
      Pawn may be extended and continued for additional
      30-day periods with the agreement of Pledgor and Pawnbroker. We may agree to extend
      the Maturity Date in our discretion. As a condition to extending the Maturity
      Date, for the initial extension and each subsequent extension, you
      must pay an amount equal to the then outstanding Pawnshop Charge (including any
      chargesaccrued after the Maturity Date, as described in Section 7
      below), and (b) satisfy Pawnbroker’s applicable criteria for extensions.
      If you do not request additional funds as part of your extension request, then
      the original Pawn will be continued.” By signing this
      agreement, the Complainant acknowledged their understanding of the terms and
      conditions of the installment loan.

      We believe that the conditions of the pawn transaction were
      clearly disclosed and cannot find any evidence of wrongdoing. TitleMax strives for
      excellent customer service and remains willing to work with the Complainant to
      assist them in paying back their loan. We encourage the Complainant to contact
      TitleMax ###-###-#### to establish a mutually acceptable repayment arrangement
      for this account.

      We
      hope that we have fully addressed the complaint. Should the Complainant or Better Business Bureau require further explanation, we
      may be reached at ****************************.

      Sincerely,

      BSG – Consumer Complaints
      ** *** ***
      ********** ** *****

    BBB Business Profiles may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.

    BBB Business Profiles are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. BBB asks third parties who publish complaints, reviews and/or responses on this website to affirm that the information provided is accurate. However, BBB does not verify the accuracy of information provided by third parties, and does not guarantee the accuracy of any information in Business Profiles.

    When considering complaint information, please take into account the company's size and volume of transactions, and understand that the nature of complaints and a firm's responses to them are often more important than the number of complaints.

    BBB Business Profiles generally cover a three-year reporting period, except for customer reviews. Customer reviews posted prior to July 5, 2024, will no longer be published when they reach three years from their submission date. Customer reviews posted on/after July 5, 2024, will be published indefinitely unless otherwise voluntarily retracted by the user who submitted the content, or BBB no longer believes the review is authentic. BBB Business Profiles are subject to change at any time. If you choose to do business with this company, please let them know that you checked their record with BBB.

    As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business. Businesses are under no obligation to seek BBB accreditation, and some businesses are not accredited because they have not sought BBB accreditation. BBB charges a fee for BBB Accreditation. This fee supports BBB's efforts to fulfill its mission of advancing marketplace trust.