Repossession Services
Solid Solutions 24/7, Inc.Headquarters
Complaints
This profile includes complaints for Solid Solutions 24/7, Inc.'s headquarters and its corporate-owned locations. To view all corporate locations, see
Customer Complaints Summary
- 4 total complaints in the last 3 years.
- 0 complaints closed in the last 12 months.
If you've experienced an issue
Submit a ComplaintThe complaint text that is displayed might not represent all complaints filed with BBB. Some consumers may elect to not publish the details of their complaints, some complaints may not meet BBB's standards for publication, or BBB may display a portion of complaints when a high volume is received for a particular business.
Initial Complaint
Date:05/08/2025
Type:Sales and Advertising IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
The company sent me verification that I had zero fees both through email and text message. After getting down to the business to retrieve my vehicle they forced me to sign a document to be on the property. The told me they were charging me $375 which had to be paid in cash. They refused to honor the confirmation they sent me or adjust any of the fees.
Business Response
Date: 06/16/2025
We received an order from REMOVEDto repossess a 2020 Chevrolet Malibu from the customer. On 05/03/2025 at 4:53 AM, our agent repossessed this unit on 36th. Ave in REMOVED. The unit was towed back to our lot in REMOVED. On 05/08/2025, the customer called in and requested an early appointment, but we had not received the release from the client as of that time. The office was able to fit the customer in, but advised that we had not received all the release info from the client. A email confirmation was sent at that time to the customer. Approx and hour later we received the information for the release from our client.The release stated to charge their customer $375.00 for redemption and storage fees on the vehicle. A new confirmation was sent at that time that listed the fees.
The customer arrived at the lot and was advised of the $375 charge. She became very agitated and refused to pay the fees. We advised her we would not release the unit until these fees were paid. The customer went to her vehicle and retrieved the money needed to pay for the unit. The customer paid the amount due and signed all of the release documents, including a document from our client listing the $375 fee.
Please be advised that our clients advise the fee we charge their customers and we collect the fees for them.
Please let me know if anything else is needed.
REMOVED.
Operations Manager
Initial Complaint
Date:08/24/2024
Type:Billing IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
Complaint for Violations of FDCPA, GLBA, and Unauthorized Repossession I am writing to express my outrage and dispute the unauthorized repossession of my vehicle on August 22, 2024, by and Solid Solution 24/7 is the repossession agent on behalf of REMOVED. This repossession was done without my knowledge, consent, or prior notice, violating my rights under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), the REMOVED-REMOVED-REMOVEDAct (GLBA), and Callifornia state-specific laws.*Violations:*1. *Unauthorized Repossession:* The repossession was done without my permission or prior notice, violating my rights as a consumer.2. *FDCPA Violations:* - Failure to provide notice of repossession (15 USC 1692g) - Failure to obtain my consent for contact (15 USC 1692c) - Harassment and abuse (15 USC 1692d)3. *GLBA Violations:* - Unauthorized disclosure of personal information (15 USC REMOVED) - Violation of my right to privacy - California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) (Civ. Code 1798.100-1798.199): Regulates the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information Violated my right to privacy.
Business Response
Date: 09/20/2024
We did not repossess your car you have the wrong company!!!!!!!!!!!Initial Complaint
Date:07/29/2024
Type:Sales and Advertising IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
My car was repossessed. When I went to retrieve my belongings, 3 grand in cash wasissing along with my wallet. My wallet had my id in it. So I had to go to DMV and reschedule. They did this to make it harder for me to retrieve my things and find out that all the cash was gone. I needed the cash to pay what I owed and get my car back. I had the money in a yellow hat in my driver's side door. They gave me back the hat, and of course it was empty. Had to get all new cards and id. Couldn't even cash my work check to get the car out. Nightmare. The guy who did the inventory should be charged.
Business Response
Date: 09/20/2024
REMOVED: We had advised you to contact the REMOVEDabout your missing property since you have an ongoing investigation with them. We did not remove any property from your vehicle and there was no money in the car at the time of the repossession.
Initial Complaint
Date:01/29/2024
Type:Sales and Advertising IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
My vehicle was repossessed by this horrible company. My wife and I went later that day to pick up our vehicle. As we were waiting for our car to be brought out of the lot someone on the opposite side of the fence where the vehicles are kept, crashed into something with what sounded like a forklift. Then yelled Fk! Moments later my wifes vehicle was brought to the gate and there were scratches down the passenger side towards the rear where there was no previous damage. The girl at the lot who was releasing the vehicle said we would be sent a claim form, she took pictures of the damage and said they would review the video to see what caused the damage. We never received any further information. I completed the affidavit which was sent to me via a request I made by finally tracking someone down at this company. I completed, notorized it and included pictures of the damage. After patiently waiting and the given timeline on the documents had elapsed, I reached out once again to the generic email inbox of this place. Within minures I received a response from a REMOVEDclaiming to be an operations manager and that he was denying my claim. He stated that the damage was preexisting, which Is not true and that my claim was filed 91 days after, again not true. After asking to see the pictures indicating the preexisting damage and contact info for his supervisor he refused to return any correspondence of mine. His email only indicates a fax number and no phone number, when the phone number I found online for this business is called, it rings once goes to silence and then disconnects. Not only was damage done to my wifes vehicle, this same company repossessed my vehicle in August 2023,, many items were stolen from my vehicle while in their possession as well. This company needs to be shut down! Each time it cost my wife and I $180 each just to get what possessions werent stolen by this shady operation!
Business Response
Date: 02/01/2024
This vehicle was repossessed on 10/21/2023 and towed back to our lot. The customer is claiming that we did damage to the passenger side rear quarter panel, but the damage was already there. Our intake pictures show the damage as well as our condition report. The customer husband sent a complaint that I received this week. I immediatly looked into the account and saw that the same damage he is claiming, on the pictures we took of the intake of this unit. I denied his claim due to the damage being there before the repossession.Customer Answer
Date: 02/01/2024
I am rejecting this response because:this information is incorrect, the vehicle was repossessed and then picked up from the storage lot on the same day 10/31/2023. If there was any damage done it was not preexisting. I have asked to see the pictures and was not given access to the information, I am the co owner of this vehicle although my wife REMOVEDis the primary owner. Legally I should be able to request any and all information. Photos, and to have the contact information of a supervisor. Since my emails were unreesponded to. The fact that the company managing the repossession of my vehicle, transporting, storage and release, cant get their dates correct leads to lack of credibility on their part regarding the supposed pictures of the preexisting damage. Furthermore, the lady at the lot where the vehicle was picked up only a few hours later the same day it was repossessed stated that the damage was done in their possession as I had indicated in my affidavit and at the yard at the time of the walk around prior to being released. Justifies my rightful request to have the damage done by this company due to the negligence of one of their employees during a step of their process. This company has so many negative reviews which speak to the character of what kind of fly by night operation they run, even included in poor reviews are some by employees who left because their own conscience couldnt be turned by this business and the shady operations they run.
Business Response
Date: 04/02/2024
This unit was repossessed on 10/31/2024 at 3:24 AM. The unit was towed back to our lot with a wheel lift tow truck. The agent completed the condition report of the unit and picture were taken of the entire unit. The damage that the customer is claiming was already there at the time of the repossession and are showing on our pictures. Due to the damage already existing, we denied the customer's claim. This is the second car that we have repossessed from this customer. We advised the customer to contact his finance company and file a complaint with them. We have not received a complaint from their finance company as of today.Customer Answer
Date: 04/02/2024
I am rejecting this response because: this company has yet to provide any photographic proof of the damage. The damage occurred on 10/31 at the lot where I retrieved the car hours later after it was repossessed. REMOVEDhas incorrectly provided the information of when the vehicle was initially repossessed. I had no vehicle repossessed on 10/21 as initially indicated in their response to my complaint. I followed the steps in obtaining and filing the affidavit provided which was obtained by steps given to my wife and I at the lot at time of pick up. As I awaited on the vehicle to be retrieved the damage occurred on the other side of the fence where the lady who released the vehicle to me acknowledged the damage had just occurred and was the one who provided the process for filing the claim and affidavit information. She also said they had the collision which caused the damage on video. At no time was there any mention of going thorough my finance company till the response to my complaint. Why should I need to do that when there is a damage claim process in place? Which I have followed. At no time has this company produced either the photos, nor the video from the yard, and should not be taken at their word alone, their word alone would not hold up in a court of law. Which very well my become my path to resolution regarding this matter. Someone sitting on the other end of REMOVED, well away from the lot where my vehicle was taken to and damaged is writing responses to my complaint and cannot speak to something theyre were not a party too, nor done their part to produce any proof of substance in regards to this matter.
Solid Solutions 24/7, Inc. is BBB Accredited.
This business has committed to upholding the BBB Standards for Trust.
More InformationWhy choose a BBB Accredited Business?BBB Business Profiles are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. BBB does not verify the accuracy of information provided by third parties, and does not guarantee the accuracy of any information in Business Profiles. As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service, or business. Businesses are under no obligation to seek BBB accreditation, and some businesses are not accredited because they have not sought BBB accreditation.
When considering complaint information, please consider the company's size and volume of transactions. Note that the nature of complaints and a company’s responses to them are often more important than the number of complaints. BBB Business Profiles generally cover a three-year reporting period.