Insurance Agency
Quick HealthInformation and Alerts
Accreditation Status
This business is not BBB accredited.
Businesses are under no obligation to seek BBB accreditation, and some businesses are not accredited because they have not sought BBB accreditation.
To be accredited by BBB, a business must apply for accreditation and BBB must determine that the business meets BBB accreditation standards, which include a commitment to make a good faith effort to resolve any consumer complaints. BBB Accredited Businesses must pay a fee for accreditation review/monitoring and for support of BBB services to the public.
Alert Details
This business has 1 alert.
Government Action: BBB reports on known government actions involving business’ marketplace conduct:
United States v. Seguro Medico, LLC
The following describes a pending government action that has been formally brought by a government agency but has not yet been resolved. We are providing a summary of the government's allegations, which have not yet been proven.
On May 14, 2025, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania announced the unsealing of a superseding indictment charging the business and its owners with conspiracy and wire fraud offenses. According to the indictment, which was returned by a federal grand jury, the defendants allegedly engaged in a scheme from at least January 2018 through December 2022, during which tens of millions of dollars in commissions were collected by systematically deceiving consumers seeking health insurance through bait-and-switch sales tactics. Specifically, the defendants allegedly misled consumers into purchasing limited benefit plans that provided little or no coverage by falsely representing those plans as comprehensive health insurance or as equivalent to major medical insurance.
As detailed in the indictment, the defendants allegedly paid lead generators to transfer live calls with consumers searching for health insurance. According to the indictment, once transferred, employees of the defendants misrepresented the company as “the national enrollment center for health insurance” and claimed to act as a third-party broker, comparing products across the entire marketplace to identify the best coverage at the lowest rates. The indictment further states that the defendants falsely asserted they “worked with over 30 of the top A-rated insurance companies” and sold comprehensive policies from well-known, reputable insurers. However, according to the indictment, the defendants did not work with the referenced A-rated carriers and did not sell major medical insurance. Instead, the defendants allegedly marketed and sold a limited set of discount plans that offered significantly reduced benefits compared to major medical coverage, and, in some cases, the plans did not constitute insurance at all.
The indictment further charges that, as a result of the defendants’ bait-and-switch schemes, tens of thousands of consumers were left without insurance coverage for the majority of their medical, dental, and prescription costs. According to the indictment, for certain consumers with serious healthcare needs, the lack of coverage from the limited benefit plans allegedly caused financial hardship and resulted in substantial medical debt, sometimes amounting to tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Additionally, the indictment accuses the defendants of employing unlicensed sales agents to sell the limited benefit plans; bundling products to imitate major medical coverage; training employees to use misleading sales scripts; and operating under various trade names and aliases. The indictment also alleges that the defendants engaged in “churning” and “policy-flipping” by reselling and upselling to existing consumers; omitted or downplayed material restrictions in the plans; overbilled and double-billed consumers; instructed consumers to ignore verification disclaimers or disclosures; altered recorded sales calls to mislead regulators; withheld material information from their employees; ignored complaints from consumers, insurance carriers, and regulators; and refused or delayed issuing refunds to affected consumers. If convicted, the owners of the business face maximum penalties of 600 years imprisonment, 5 years supervised release, over $5,000,000 in fines, along with restitution and forfeiture.
Important Information
Pending Government Action
The following describes a government action that has been resolved by either a settlement or a decision by a court or administrative agency. If the matter is being appealed, it will be noted below.
On November 1, 2022, the Insurance Commissioner for the Commonwealth of PA (Department) and Arthur Walsh settled (Consent Order) for alleged violations of the insurance laws or regulations of the Commonwealth. According to the Consent Order, Walsh's agency provided sales scripts to employees which contained false statements including that its employees "work with all 37 A-rated insurance carriers" when that was not the case; provided false sales scripts to employees to be used when selling policies, stating it searched the entire market and provided consumers with the most amount of benefits at the most affordable rate, yet it only offered a specific coverage and had not reviewed everything available to the consumers; and provided false statements about its agents being "one of the top agents in your state" and being a "non-commissioned agent" when the agent in question was not the top agent in the state and was paid incentives/commissions based on the sale. Walsh's employees, using these false scripts, made the insured customers believe that they had purchased policies with full medical coverage that covered pre-existing conditions and surgeries and identified themselves to consumers as "The National Enrollment Center" and "The Health Enrollment Center" when receiving incoming calls instead of by its registered name.
The Consent Order states the Respondent also allowed an employee or employees to submit at least 5,669 applications for insurance under his name, 102 insurance applications under the name and license number of another agent who was no longer working for him, and allowed an employee to submit at least 12 insurance applications under the name of a licensed producer after they had left employment with Walsh’s company.
As a result of the Consent Order, Walsh agreed to cease engaging in any unfair insurance practice, fraud, forgery, dishonest acts, or an act involving a breach of fiduciary duty, civil penalty, and suspension and immediate surrender of all licenses to do the business of insurance. The consent order is effective immediately.
Walsh's attorneys have advised the BBB that they filed an emergency petition to stop enforcement of the Consent Order. Walsh's filing argues that the Consent Order was obtained unconstitutionally by failing to provide adequate due process consideration in reaching the Consent Order. That matter is now pending in litigation.
BBB Business Profiles may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.
BBB Business Profiles are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. BBB asks third parties who publish complaints, reviews and/or responses on this website to affirm that the information provided is accurate. However, BBB does not verify the accuracy of information provided by third parties, and does not guarantee the accuracy of any information in Business Profiles.
When considering complaint information, please take into account the company's size and volume of transactions, and understand that the nature of complaints and a firm's responses to them are often more important than the number of complaints.
BBB Business Profiles generally cover a three-year reporting period, except for customer reviews. Customer reviews posted prior to July 5, 2024, will no longer be published when they reach three years from their submission date. Customer reviews posted on/after July 5, 2024, will be published indefinitely unless otherwise voluntarily retracted by the user who submitted the content, or BBB no longer believes the review is authentic. BBB Business Profiles are subject to change at any time. If you choose to do business with this company, please let them know that you checked their record with BBB.
As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business. Businesses are under no obligation to seek BBB accreditation, and some businesses are not accredited because they have not sought BBB accreditation. BBB charges a fee for BBB Accreditation. This fee supports BBB's efforts to fulfill its mission of advancing marketplace trust.