Complaints

The complaint text that is displayed might not represent all complaints filed with BBB. Some consumers may elect to not publish the details of their complaints, some complaints may not meet BBB's standards for publication, or BBB may display a portion of complaints when a high volume is received for a particular business.

• Initial Complaint

  Date:01/04/2023

  Type:Order Issues
  Status:

  AnsweredMore info

  Complaint statuses

  Resolved:

  The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.

  Unresolved:

  The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.

  Answered:

  The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.

  Unanswered:

  The business failed to respond to the dispute.

  Unpursuable:

  BBB is unable to locate the business.

  Flooring and backsplash contracted 12.21.22. Demo on 1500 sq foot condo began 2.14.22 with final work by 5.2.22. Quarter round work poor with 4 different type of cuts at various angles. Deep scratches left on kitchen floor by workers. Backsplash was not flush, varying width of grout lines, and grout used at base in error with improper backing. Multiple attempts to redo 1/4 rd. work, backsplash, and cabinetry were unsuccessful between 4.22 and 8.22 (condo owner initially requested work to be halted 6.22 but in 7.22 allowed company one more attempt to "make it right"). Although some floor boards replaced, the majority of scratched boards were not. Instead, liquid scratch pens used to try and cover damage. Additionally, there were scratches to front of stainless refrigerator (company credited door replacement), and water line had been fractured in removing/returning door and is unrepairable. In summary, multiple attempts by Underfoot to address quality and damages were sub-standard. Outside tradesmen required to fix poor quality work. A new refrigerator is required. Ventilation duct cleaning was required at $700.
  Over forty texts, over 50 emails, and numerous phone calls between owner and company related to quality. Work is below industry standards as verified by a licensed contractor. Damages have been incurred by owners related to flooring, quarterround trim, backsplash, carpentry, granite, ventilation cleaning for air quality, and loss of rental income.
  Detailed invoice sent to Underfoot owner on 11.11.22 for $2485.72 in damages. Requested name and policy number of insurance company in order to file for damages. Company owner responded to give him time to check with counsel. Additional email sent 11.22.22 and 12.6.22 with acknowledged receipt on 11.22.22 only. As of 1.4.23, no reply. Invoice revised to include additional flooring product needed, carpentry repairs, and loss of rental income for $16,213.72 and sent to owner on 1.4.23.

  

  Business Response

  Date: 01/06/2023

  To Whom it may concern,

   

  We at Underfoot make all concerns of customers a priority.  In regard to this complaint.  We always made Mrs. **** a priority.  We tried to service her in a way to solve her issues.  

  This transaction drug out over a year.  We were always waiting for third parties to come and look at the work and for her to come back with critiques.  Some were valid and we would immediately correct them, but some were not.

  We installed the first backsplash per her requirements ( tight grout lines ).  Once completed, she did not like the tight grout lines.  So, she asked to tear it out and redo it and she would pay for it.  So, we did.  Then she said we had some small minor touchup issues with the second install.  We came out and corrected those immediately.  Then later she came back with more issues. We agreed to correct them, but she denied us access.

  The Floor.

  We always tell clients there will be allot of dust when tearing out existing floors.  We do our best to keep the dust down. Especially with gypcrete. We also, hired a cleaning person to go and clean the house after demo.  Mrs **** came back and complained so we gave her a $500.00 credit to help the dust issues.  We also were told to use 1/4 round with the floor, and we usually tear out the baseboard and reinstall them or use bay shoe. We tell the clients we do not caulk or paint them.  They will need to do that themselves or have a painter do it.  We installed the floor, and she did not like the job with the quarter round trim and an area by the dishwasher.  We sent multiple people out to correct these issues, but nothing was working for her. So, we offered her to remove the 1/4 round from the bill including the labor.  She said we dented her refrigerated.  We don't know if we did or not.  But we offered to pay for the door, and she agreed.  We credited that off the bill.  Then she came back and said we scratched her new floor we installed.  She had many people coming in and out of her building checking our work etc.  Then she came back and said she found some scratches in the floor.  We immediately came out and tore the floor out where the scratches were and corrected them.  That said, we don't know who scratched the floor, but we took responsibility and corrected them.  She said we tracked in other stuff on the floor, so we went and cleaned the floors by hand.  Then she came back and said we glued the floor down and glue squeezed out onto the floor.  This is a floating floor and there is no glue used.  She, then came back with additional minor issues and we said we would again come out and address them, but she declined.  We then wanted to be paid and 

  she is now claiming many issues that are new and or not our responsibility.  We have two outstanding invoices that need to be paid in full which also reflect all the above credits mentioned.   We have tried to make this customer happy.  It has 

  now come to that we have forwarded this to our lawyer.  Our attorney will be getting in touch with Mrs. ****

   

  Customer Answer

  Date: 01/16/2023

  Complaint: ********
  
  
  
  I am rejecting this response because:
  
  
    Please see the customer’s rejection of company’s
  response below.  As requested by BBB, identifying
  names should not be used.  Customer
  respectfully requests that previous company response be revised to eliminate
  customer’s name and be consistent with BBB guidelines for this process. First
  two initials of first names were used in this response to identify individuals
  involved.
  

  SUMMARY
  
  Eight months lapsed from time of contract signing to company message that “work
  complete”.  There was a period of a 6
  week “cease work” by customer due to ongoing issues with quality work and
  repeated damages.  When customer
  discussed with company the length of time it would take for flooring install,
  she was told “about 1 month” by **, with work to begin late January 2022.  Unfortunately, after the “all clear” by the
  company in August 2022, the customer was still left with significantly
  scratched floors, a backsplash with powdering caulking with small holes, messy
  grout, an improperly repaired granite countertop seal, a shoddily repaired 3-
  inch square hole in cabinetry, quarter rounds that had 4 different cut angles,
  adhesive dollops on kitchen floor and elsewhere, and a non-working refrigerator
  water/ icemaker. Company credited customer for quarter round work and $500 out
  of $1300 cleaning, and $100 toward repair of grout.  However, it cost customer more to find outside
  tradesmen to repair and redo the substandard work and to fix the cabinetry
  damages.  Damages to cabinetry, floors,
  and granite had been admitted by the company (except for the fractured water
  line and adhesive) and were never in doubt of who caused them until the
  customer filed this BBB complaint. Customer had paid $10,688.00 total (this
  included $1327.79 for first backsplash) and was still left with unfinished and
  substandard work and a unit that could not be rented until work completed. 
  
  The customer was extremely patient allowing the company
  repeated attempts to address the damages and multiple workmanship issues with
  at least 6 visits of tradesmen after initial install between April 2022 and
  August 2022.  She had a licensed
  contractor with 40 years of experience view work.  She simply lost confidence after 8 months and
  hired other skilled tradesmen to complete work.  This process took 10 weeks.  The
  customer always communicated with the company of her plan to settle any
  invoices once the work was completed.  Due to the multiple damages and lost rental income, the company owes the
  customer a sum of $16,213.72. This is after $1319.28 was deducted from outstanding balance that
  customer owed company, although the company has asked the customer pay twice
  for a substandard backsplash job that is still not complete.  Customer requested
  company’s insurance information in order to file a claim on damages and was
  denied.
  
  Although the customer would prefer to settle this case, she
  has significant documentation and will move forward until it is resolved. This rejection only allowed 4 attachments, but many more photos and invoices for damages were unable to be attached. 
  __________________________________________________________________________
  Underfoot
  Statement: This transaction drug out over a year. 
  We were always waiting for third parties to come and look at the work and for
  her to come back with critiques.

  RESPONSE: It is a
  true statement that this process has lasted a year, but it is not due to
  “waiting on the customer or third parties”. Five months lapsed between initial install and company “all clear”.
  Customer or licensed general contractor viewed work in person or with video
  often within 2 business days of all clear.   It took 9 weeks from demo until install. Customer was told “wrong
  flooring had been sent and a supply chain issue”.   Condo was left with major concrete dust.
  (see photo).  Another seven weeks
  lapsed  between install of floor in April
  until halt work order 6.9.22.  Customer
  allowed one more attempt to “make it right” on 7.27.22, it was another 5 weeks
  for company to complete work. Condo owner invited company owner to meet the
  week of 7.25.22 but ** came without company owner.  That is a total of 5 months, and at least six
  additional visits after initial install in which customer was awaiting work to
  be completed by the company. (the cease period between 6.9.22 and 7.27.22 was
  not included).Rental
  income was lost from June 2022 moving forward; property manager had to cancel
  listing.

  
  Underfoot: So, she asked to tear it out and redo it and
  she would pay for it.  So, we did.  Then she said we had some small minor
  touchup issues with the second install.  We came out and corrected those
  immediately.  Then later she came back with more issues. We agreed to
  correct them, but she denied us access.
  RESPONSE: The
  original backsplash was not installed properly.  Unfortunately, it was paid for by customer.  Customer originally stated redo needed and
  would pay for tile, but as work was reviewed by customer and licensed general
  contractor, it was apparent that work was sub-standard. Company/** made site
  visit in mid May 2 wks later and agreed that although the tile did have some
  wave, the lack of consistent spacing between and lack of flushness did not give
  proper appearance.  On redo, the
  installer TR stated the wrong backing had been used which may have caused some
  of the poor appearance issues.  Unfortunately, the redo completed 5 weeks later had messy grout lines,
  and there were visible holes appearing in the grout.  Additionally, grout was used instead of
  industry standard of colored caulking a**** entire bottom 12 ft of backsplash.(photo)
  Customer was very clear about issues of messy grout, powdering grout, and holes
  in grout, as well as one tile that was sticking out and had to be
  replaced.  Final all clear 8.24.22
  revealed grout still not cleaned up, and powdering still present. Professional
  tile installer charged $400 to address backsplash issues.  Statement that customer denied access is
  untrue, as company was to fix these issues beginning 7.27.22, and date of all
  clear 8.24.22.  Cease work message sent
  to company owner and ** on 8.24.22.
  

  Underfoot: We do our best to keep the dust down.
  Especially with gypcrete. We also, hired a cleaning person to go and clean the
  house after demo.  Mrs **** came back and complained so we gave her a
  $500.00 credit to help the dust issues.
  RESPONSE:  “Doing
  best to keep dust down”.  There was no
  partitioning off or covering areas, appliances, cabinets, ventilation ducts,
  fuse boxes, etc.. The amount of dust created by demo was not the company’s
  fault, but lack of proper preparation and protection was.  The company may have had to hire a service to
  clean floors because it would have been difficult to install the flooring over
  the inches thick dust (see 1st photo). However, no other surfaces
  were cleaned. Customer paid $1300 for additional cleaning (ventilation duct and
  a construction cleaner (see attachment). The company did credit $500 of the
  $1300 spent for cleaning.  Customer spent
  an additional 20 hours cleaning in the week 5.15.22.  
  

  Underfoot: We also were told to use 1/4 round with the
  floor, and we usually tear out the baseboard and reinstall them or use bay
  shoe. We tell the clients we do not caulk or paint them.  They will need
  to do that themselves or have a painter do it.  We installed the floor,
  and she did not like the job with the quarter round trim and an area by the
  dishwasher.  We sent multiple people out to correct these issues, but
  nothing was working for her. So, we offered her to remove the 1/4 round from
  the bill including the labor. 
  RESPONSE: The
  customer did not even know to ask for ¼ round and never “told company to use”
  such a product.   The options of
  baseboard/bay shoe were never presented to customer upon original contract.
  Once flooring installed, poor quality finishing of quarter rounds using 90
  degree cuts were immediately brought to ** attention.  Subsequent teams attempted to band-aid the
  cuts using a multi-tool. The results were poor when viewed as a whole.  On the site visit in July by **, he agreed
  that 4 different cuts were used and appearance not consistent.  Licensed general contractor stated that
  quarter round work appeared unprofessional with cuts varying and lack of
  finished corners.   Additionally, there
  were lack of transitions of doors from utility and front door which were
  brought to company’s attention 4.27.22 and were finally completed 8.24.22 (see
  photo).  There were multiple other issues
  including no quarter rounds installed on wood cabinets, white quarter rounds on
  wood cabinet, etc.  As previously noted,
  there was damage to kitchen cabinetry (see photo; a 3 inch square hole) below
  dishwasher which company was unable to adequately address and required a finish
  carpenter by condo owner and painter to stain.
  

  Underfoot:  She said we dented her refrigerated.  We
  don't know if we did or not.  But we offered to pay for the door, and she
  agreed.  We credited that off the bill. 
  RESPONSE:  Company
  admitted to damage of refrigerator previously. Upon entry to the condo 2.18.22,
  two large scratches noted in fridge.(photo)  ** alerted immediately.  No other
  workers had been in unit.  In April when
  installer TH was present, he admitted, and stated “talk to **”.  ** stated in conversation that they had not
  taken doors off to get it by the peninsula.  In subsequent moving of the fridge back into the kitchen in May, **
  stated “it took all of 8 mins to remove those doors”.  The company was the ONLY individuals in the
  unit prior to  2.22 when doors were noted
  to be scratched. Pictures are present prior to demo with fridge unscratched.
  The company were the ONLY ones to move the fridge which fractured the water
  line, which caused leaking of water whenever water or ice used from door.  This was noted in May visit when the fridge
  was first used after being reinserted and water leaked from door.  An experienced appliance repairman made the
  diagnosis (see invoice). The only way for it to be fractured is from
  reinstalling a door or moving and kinking it.  The fridge had no leaking January 30, 2022 upon exit of renter and was
  used in early February for ice water without leaking.  The customer paid for appliances to be moved
  and re-inserted safely. A credit for one of the door panels was issued, but the
  fracture in water line and the scratched doors required a new refrigerator to
  be purchased.
  

  Underfoot:  Then she came back and said we scratched her
  new floor we installed.  She had many people coming in and out of her
  building checking our work etc.  Then she came back and said she found
  some scratches in the floor.  We immediately came out and tore the floor
  out where the scratches were and corrected them.  That said, we don't know
  who scratched the floor, but we took responsibility and corrected them. 
  RESPONSE:  The
  scratches to the floor were noted in on condo owners return in May 14 after
  flooring and backsplash was supposedly complete.  Only one other worker and the general
  contractor viewing work had been in the unit on May 1 and May 8; there were no
  floor scratches present.  They are parallel
  on entry to the kitchen and quite visible. (photo). The scratches were possibly
  caused by moving the refrigerator back into place which was done by Underfoot
  May 13, but it is not clear.   ** kept
  saying “we have pens we can used to take care of it”. On a subsequent visit, he
  attempted repair unsuccessfully, and stated he wanted someone from their
  company to address that was more experienced with the scratch fillers. When
  that was not successful, the boards were to be replaced and “all clear” given
  8.24.22.  Some boards had been replaced,
  but the kitchen entry boards were not replaced despite company stating they had
  been. It appears the crayon pen was used.  Additionally, there were new smaller scratches in middle of the
  floor.  These were also reported. 
  

  Underfoot:  She said we tracked in other stuff on the
  floor, so we went and cleaned the floors by hand.  Then she came back and
  said we glued the floor down and glue squeezed out onto the floor.  This
  is a floating floor and there is no glue used.  She, then came back with
  additional minor issues and we said we would again come out and address them,
  but she declined. 
  RESPONSE:  The
  “black substance” was adhesive.  Condo
  owner was alerted by flooring contractor after 8.24.22 “all clear” by company
  of its presence, and there was concern about where it was used.  Was reassured by company that it was not used
  on flooring.  When company owner queried
  company owner as to WHERE was it used? (utility transition boards, or 3 inch
  repair below dishwasher) there was no reply. 
  The condo
  owner cleaned additional adhesive two weeks later that was located in kitchen
  and by patio door.  There were no other
  individuals in unit between Aug 1 and Aug 24. 
  

  Underfoot: We then wanted to be paid and she is now claiming many issues that
  are new and or not our responsibility. 
  RESPONSE: Outside
  tradesmen were required to complete work to meet industry standards. Company
  actually owes customer for damages, labor, product, and lost rent.  Customer had to locate workers and get job
  scheduled.  Work required included
  replacement of flooring from area of scratches to end of kitchen, redo of many
  of 1/4round repair of cabinet damage below dishwasher, cleanup of grout, and
  regrouting of several pieces of tile due to holes and powdering out, and a new
  refrigerator.   All mentioned issues are
  the result of company damages, labor and product required to correct poor
  quality work which did not meet industry standards, and loss of rental
  income.  A detailed invoice was sent to
  company owner in November, revised in January.