ComplaintsforMegaPath
Need to file a complaint?
BBB is here to help. We'll guide you through the process.
Complaint Details
Note that complaint text that is displayed might not represent all complaints filed with BBB. See details.
Initial Complaint
08/18/2023
- Complaint Type:
- Order Issues
- Status:
- Answered
St ******************* has been utilizing Fusion Connect/MegaPath for the past 7 years (contract was signed March 2016). Their service is spotty (will drop service for days at a time), their customer service is lacking, and their bills are outrageously high compared to competitors. We decided to discontinue using them for our internet/phone. When cancelling, we were told we have roughly $3500 in early cancellation fees. The original contract signed in 2016 was for 36 months. The FINE print says that once the original term is up, the contract rolls over for the same term unless otherwise requested within 30 days of the end of the term. 1) They provide no notification that the end of term is coming - not even buried at the bottom of an email most people would ignore. 2) They say our current contract is until March ****. Their own math does not work. If these terms are for 36 months a piece, the renewals have been 2019, 2022, and, therefore, the next would be in ****. We seek to have our early cancelation fees waived. We acknowledge what the terms state; however, making those terms nearly impossible to find and not notifying the customer of any opportunity to discontinue service is a shady business practice.Business response
09/08/2023
Fusion Cloud Services, LLC (Fusion) responds to a complaint submitted to the BBB Serving ********************** and Northern Coastal ********** by *********************** on behalf of St. ******************* (Complainant), in the above referenced matter. Complainant disputes early termination fees resulting from Complainants termination of a service agreement prior to the agreement termination date. While Complainant acknowledges the applicability of an early termination fee if not cancelling service prior to the contract termination under the service terms and conditions, Complainant maintains that the account is not subject to an early termination fee due to lack of agreement termination notice and an incorrect agreement termination date. Complainants basis for seeking waiver of early termination fees are misplaced.
Complainant is Subject to Service Terms and Conditions. When entering into a service agreement, Complainant agreed to be bound by the applicable terms and conditions as set forth in the agreement. These terms and conditions establish the agreement renewal process as Complainant acknowledges. Further Complainant implicitly acknowledges that the agreements were subject to automatic renewal over the course of seven years and three years after the initial 36 month service term.
Legacy Megapath service terms and conditions are posted at ******************************************************** and specifically at *************************************************************************************************************************** 8, Term and Termination, explicitly establishes that:
Unless Subscriber provides notification in accordance with the Fee Schedule and Service Exhibit at least thirty (30) days, but no more than forty-five (45) days, before the end of a Service Term ( that Subscriber does not intend to renew, or wishes to cancel the Agreement; or whishes to extend the Term of the Service for a multi-year term or on a month-to-month basis, then the Services will automatically renew for subsequent terms of one (1) year
Complainant now effectively seeks to be absolved of responsibility over the accounts agreement terms and conditions by maintaining that because Fusion did not affirmatively notify Complainant of an upcoming renewal date the terms and conditions no longer apply. Subscribers ultimately bear responsibility of managing the contracts they agreed to. Further, subscribers may contact Fusion at any time to address questions regarding their accounts. There is no record of Complainant having contacted Fusion regarding the contract terms until the Complainants termination notice.
Complainants ***** Services Agreement Automatically Renewed on April 1, 2023. Complainant maintains that the service agreement for which the early termination fees applied does not end until 2025. Complainant apparently believes that the automatic renewal period is for 36 months. Complainant is mistaken. As noted above, the automatic renewal period is twelve months. Complainant maintains two separate Fusion accounts, account ****** and *******. Separate voice,Ethernet and ************ agreements apply under each account. Account ****** includes a voice service agreement that was automatically renewed on April 1, 2023 and prematurely terminated by Complainant, and is the subject of this complaint.
Complainant is ultimately responsible for management of the account service agreements and remains subject to the agreement terms and conditions. Complainant cancelled service prior to the March 31, **** voice service termination date and is subject to early termination fees, under the applicable terms and conditions, accordingly.Customer response
09/08/2023
Complaint: 20491607
I am rejecting this response because:I want to call attention to the fact that the information regarding service terms is hidden deep within their terms of service. I had to have a representative guide me through several internet pages to even get to the portion regarding service terms. It's deceptive. These contracts were not signed by me or anyone still working here; in fact, the original signer is deceased. They make absolutely no attempt to notify their customers when the end of a service term is approaching. While that is not technically illegal, it does not encourage any type of customer-first relationship. I am not in the minority. Googling this company, the reviews overwhelmingly sound like mine.
Additionally, in those terms of service that their own representative lead me straight to, the contract says "Service will automatically renew for subsequent terms of the same length as the *************** Term". Our initial service term was 36 months. In their response through BBB, they say I'm mistaken and it's 12 months which is just another example of their deception.
I know not caring for one's customers is not illegal, but the apparent company line is just disrespectful. There is no acknowledgement that there is room for improvement in their policies.
Sincerely,
***********************Business response
09/15/2023
Fusion Cloud Services, LLC (Fusion) responds to **************(Complainant) rejection of Fusions September 8, 2023 response to her original complaint in the above referenced matter.
Fusion acknowledges ************** concerns regarding understanding the terms of the accounts service agreement under the specific circumstances she describes. Nevertheless, her characterization of these circumstances as being deceptive is entirely misplaced as there has been no effort by Fusion to obfuscate the terms and conditions of its service agreements at any time.
Service agreements enable subscribers to benefit from lower cost service in return for subscriber term commitments. In return,service agreement terms and conditions are intended, among other things, to ensure subscriber term fulfillment. That the original signer of ******************** agreement is deceased does not absolve the account from the agreement terms and conditions. Nor does a lack of understanding of the applicability of terms and conditions absolve the account from those terms and conditions. And although affirmative reminder of agreement renewals may be a helpful enhancement to the renewal process, it is impractical to provide such reminders to thousands of Fusion subscribers with multiple agreements and multiple renewal periods. Further. Fusion customer service representatives are available to address subscriber inquiries and to assist subscribers with service-related matters at any time. Ultimately, Complainant appears to have contacted Fusion to address her questions.
Regarding the auto renewal period, Fusions renewal period has remained 12 months. Complainant is correct that the accounts original Megapath terms and conditions carried an automatically renewing term equal to the initial contract term. Upon Megapaths incorporation to Fusion, all Megapath subscribers became subject to Fusions terms and conditions, which include a 12 month automatic renewal period, as reflected in the attachment.
Contrary to Complainants characterization, Fusion cares deeply for its subscribers and readily acknowledges that there is always room for improvement. Fusions has not, however, been in any way deceptive,but rather has acted strictly in accordance with its publicly posted service agreement terms and conditions under which Complainants account has saved considerable expense over the years since the account was served by Fusion.
Fusion maintains that it has now fully responded to Complainants complaint.Customer response
09/18/2023
Complaint: 20491607
I am rejecting this response because:You say that Fusion cares deeply for its subscribers, but that is certainly not the case, something that we as dissatisfied subscribers have experienced for years. You say you made no effort to obfuscate the terms and conditions of the ******* terms, but, without a doubt, you werent forthcoming about these terms either. They are not on the original contracts, but because you have a link to the terms of *******, you consider that transparent enough.Case and point: I have brought up the incorrect ******* term date several times and you are JUST NOW pointing out that when MegaPath was incorporated into Fusion,all MegaPath subscribers became subject to Fusions terms and conditions. That was not something ever said to me in any conversation I had with your customer ******* agents when I asked about the ******* terms directly and when your customer ******* agent walked me directly to the terms of ******* page.
You say that a lack of understanding of the applicability of the terms and conditions does not absolve the account of those terms of *******.While that is true, instead of caring deeply for your subscriber, you are questioning my intelligence and ability to understand basic written English.
You say that we have saved considerable expense over the years by being a customer of Fusion-that I can disprove easily. Fusions ******* costs are astronomical compared to their competition- one of the reasons we decided to go with another company (cutting out monthly expenses by 50%).
While you did not defy your own terms and conditions, you absolutely do not care about your subscribers.
Sincerely,
***********************Initial Complaint
01/18/2022
- Complaint Type:
- Product Issues
- Status:
- Answered
An Email was created in my name from (covad.net ) that was not created by me and it is linked to my name and address. I tried contacting business several times ( covad communications ) to report fraudulent email , but no answer from company. I went to website and it seems link is not working.email created is ************************************* I cannot get full email name since I the website reporting this requires payment.Business response
01/31/2022
Fusion LLC (Fusion) hereby respond to the above-referenced complaint. Complainant, *************************, expressed concern over finding that a fictitious email address with her name @covad.nethad been generated. Complainant states that she was unsuccessful in being able to determine the source of the email address through Covad Communications.
Upon receipt of the Complaint, Fusion contacted Complainant to obtain additional information, and was informed that the @covad.net email address appeared in a person search engine website. Fusion explained that there was no relationship between Fusion and Covad and that Fusion would not have under any circumstances generated the email address. Complainant is not a Fusion subscriber and confirmed that she did not recognize the Fusion company name.
It is unclear why Complainants complaint was sent to Fusion as Fusion is in no way associated with Covad nor the person search website where Complainants ******************************* appears to have been generated, does not provide service to Complainant, and would under no circumstance have generated the @covad.net email address. Fusion provided Complainant with contact information if there are further questions.Initial Complaint
10/19/2021
- Complaint Type:
- Order Issues
- Status:
- Answered
We entered into contract for VOIP services on 11/10/15 with an annual auto renew every March 29. Due to Covid-related downturn we were forced to downsize and cut expenses. We gave Megapath/Fusion written notice that we did not want to auto renew on March 25, 2021. They declined our notice because it did not fall within their notice "window" of 45 -30 days prior to auto renew date. Because we missed the 15 day notice window, they have charged us a $4,472.25 penalty. We have spoken to several customer services representatives and supervisors, all of whom inform us the penalty cannot be waived.Business response
11/29/2021
Complainant seeks waiver of an early termination fee resulting from Complainants termination of an automatic service agreement renewal requested outside of the service contract termination period.
Pursuant to Fusions service terms and conditions, contracted service agreements, including automatic renewals, must be terminated within 45 to 30 days prior to the contract termination/renewal date, as Complainant acknowledges. This established termination period is necessary to enable Fusion to coordinate with underlying carriers and properly manage account termination. In missing the account termination period, Complainants account was assessed an early termination fee in accordance with Fusions terms and conditions. On November 18 and 19, 2021, Fusion representatives contacted Complainant. Complainant offered a $2,000.00 payment on assessed charges, which Fusion accepts if paid on or before December 31, 2021. Upon receipt fr payment, Fusion agrees to waive the remaining $2,795.24 in fees. Complainants agreement to Fusions proposed resolution remains pending.
Fusion regrets the delay submission of its response resulting from a change in the BBBs contact information. On November 11, 2021, Fusion informed the BBB of the Companys updated contact information, as reflected below.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. Questions may be directed to ******************, copied on this email, or to me.
**********************.
****** Isar
Consultants to
Fusion LLC
****** Isar
( ************
*Some consumers may elect to not publish the details of their complaints, some complaints may not meet BBB's standards for publication, or BBB may display a portion of complaints when a high volume is received for a particular business. ↩
BBB Business Profiles may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.
BBB Business Profiles are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. BBB asks third parties who publish complaints, reviews and/or responses on this website to affirm that the information provided is accurate. However, BBB does not verify the accuracy of information provided by third parties, and does not guarantee the accuracy of any information in Business Profiles.
When considering complaint information, please take into account the company's size and volume of transactions, and understand that the nature of complaints and a firm's responses to them are often more important than the number of complaints.
BBB Business Profiles generally cover a three-year reporting period. BBB Business Profiles are subject to change at any time. If you choose to do business with this business, please let the business know that you contacted BBB for a BBB Business Profile.
As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business.
Customer Reviews are not used in the calculation of BBB Rating
Contact Information
6800 Koll Center Pkwy STE 200
Pleasanton, CA 94566-7053
Customer Complaints Summary
3 total complaints in the last 3 years.
1 complaints closed in the last 12 months.