Business ProfileforMattleman, Weinroth & Miller, P.C.

After initial conversation with ****** Weinroth of Mattleman, Weinroth and Miller, ***, (401 *************************************************************), I signed a retainer on May 18, 2020 with the law firm to execute a transfer of deed from my mother to myself, the executor of her estate and heir. ******* ********, ***. was assigned to handle this transaction. Since I shared inheritance of the subject property with five siblings, each had to sign an affidavit relinquishing their present interest. During the next several weeks, I submitted documentation, traded emails, and had at least two telephone conversations with Ms. ******** and her assistant, Ms. ******** *******. We got stuck on the recording of the legal description of the property which was described by an original deed, a subsequent deed for acreage added to the property, and a letter from the ***** ******** engineer consolidating the disparate lots including a portion of a paper lot owned by the ********. Ms. ********** solution did not specifically mention the land from the second deed and only slightly referenced the consolidation letter from the ********. I indicated that the property boundaries were being inadequately described and stated my concern that this might be problematic for any future transfer of title. After much back and forth, Ms. ******** stated that the documentation submitted did not allow a more specific reference to the second deed and that a brief reference to the ******** consolidation letter was sufficient. I disagreed and indicated that I was not satisfied with the legal description. Ms. ******** offered no options or remedies for my concerns. After several challenges to her solution, I relented to her legal opinion.All affidavits were signed, notarized and returned by July 13, 2020.The prepared deed with addenda was assembled and submitted to ****** ****** for recording on or about July 14, 2020. A substantial amount of time passed with no status updates from the firm. All, or substantially all, communication was initiated by me. Finally on September 14, 2020, I was informed that the recorded deed had been received and would be mailed to me. Upon receipt and inspection, I noticed that the legal description of the property, a matter that I had considered crucial and inadequately prepared, was entirely absent from the recorded documents. This had obviously escaped the attention of the assigned parties. I informed the firm of this oversight. Ms. ******** and staff agreed to pursue this with the ******. Again, after several inquiries by me, I was consistently told that the ****** had been informed, but no updates were available. I asked that the entire resources of the firm be used to correct this oversight.On January 7, 2021, I contacted the firm for another update. I was informed by automatic reply that Ms. ********* had left the firm. Apparently, her paralegal had also departed. With an active case on file, I had received no notification of their departure, nor notice of the reassignment of the case. A reply to an email stated that Ms. ******** ********, a paralegal, under the direction of **** *. Miller, ***, ***. would follow-up with the ******. A letter to the principals of the firm, Messrs. ****** Weinroth and **** *. Miller, ***, received no response. Over the course of the next several weeks, Ms. ******** and I exchanged emails. Finally, on April 19, 2021, I received notification that the corrected deed had been received and would be mailed to me. I received the new deed within the next few days.This firm, even in the midst of a pandemic demonstrated extraordinary unprofessionalism and misconduct displayed as disregard for a client, poor communication and low creativity. It is fitting that such poor performance be recorded for others to review and that their record be accordingly blemished.