Complaints

The complaint text that is displayed might not represent all complaints filed with BBB. Some consumers may elect to not publish the details of their complaints, some complaints may not meet BBB's standards for publication, or BBB may display a portion of complaints when a high volume is received for a particular business.

• Initial Complaint

  Date:06/10/2025

  Type:Order Issues
  Status:

  AnsweredMore info

  Complaint statuses

  Resolved:

  The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.

  Unresolved:

  The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.

  Answered:

  The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.

  Unanswered:

  The business failed to respond to the dispute.

  Unpursuable:

  BBB is unable to locate the business.

  I am filing this urgent complaint on behalf of my elderly parents, who are being pressured into selling their home by LPI Home Buyers, a Florida-based company. In March 2025, my parents (both over 60 and full-time caregivers for my 90-year-old grandmother) were sent a purchase agreement by *** and asked to sign without legal counsel. Believing it to be a flexible, non-binding offer, they signed. After a few weeksand due to mounting stress, financial hardship, and my grandmothers deteriorating healththey made the clear decision not to proceed and emailed *** to terminate the agreement.Despite their request, *** representative *** Bajar replied by email stating, cancelation is not an option. This aggressive pressure caused significant emotional distress, especially for my mother, who now fears losing her home and being left homeless. My parents cannot afford to move and are no longer in any positionfinancially or mentallyto continue with this process.Even more troubling, LPI claimed they were not given enough time for due diligence, despite the fact they had a photographer at the home and showings scheduled within the first week. We have emails and video footage confirming they were never denied access. Yet, just days before the original due diligence period expired, my parents were advised into signing an addendum granting *** more time.This entire situation has taken a serious toll on their mental health. The contract feels predatory in nature and offers no clear cancellation terms. No oneespecially vulnerable seniorsshould be trapped in an agreement they no longer understand or support. We are asking the BBB to step in and help release my parents from this unfair agreement immediately.

  Customer Answer

  Date: 06/11/2025

  After filing my initial complaint. **** ********* the owner of ************* called me and emailed me directly instead of using the BBB portal to communicate. 

  In a follow up text message he issued legal threats in response to this complaint.

  Hello, I adivse you to recind the BBB complaint as I've advised my attorney to tell your parents attorney we'll counter sue for defamation against you. thank you 

   

  Mr. *********  then had his lawyer send a message to my parents lawyer about the complaint further doubling down on the legal threat. 
  

  In addition, please note that your clients' son has posted a defamatory complaint on the BBB which must be taken down immediately. In the event it is not removed, my client has advised my office to immediately file a suit for Defamation Per Se against your client's son. I have included a copy of that BBB complaint hereto.

  I believe this is inappropriate and may be an attempt to silence my valid concerns. It feels like intimidation and retaliation. I am requesting that all further communication take place only through the BBB portal. 

  

  Business Response

  Date: 06/13/2025

  We were approached by the complainants parents (the sellers) to purchase their ********, ** home back in December 2024. Before the sellers signed the contract, my acquisition manager **** Suddith had several conversations to discuss the purchase price, how we work, and the other purchase terms (this was done via text, email, and phone calls). We eventually came to an agreement as to a purchase price of $750,000, and we also agreed to the other purchase terms (closing date, inspection period, etc.). We sent the sellers the purchase contract on March 6, 2025, which they signed. The sellers have sold houses before, and own another investment property in *******, so they are aware that all purchase contracts are legally binding. They even came to my office in *********** after the contract was signed asking for an update and a $100,000 advance which they needed for their business. I met with them and gave them an update, but I politely declined their request for the cash advance, as this was not in the purchase contract, and we dont usually give cash advances before closing.
  
  After this meeting, they started to not fully cooperate with our requests for access (as was required per the terms of the purchase contract). They then asked to cancel the contract, which I declined as I was still in my due diligence period and planned to continue with the purchase. They then gave me a list of excuses to cancel such as they that are sick, Their grandmother was ill, they just want to rent the property out for now, their son wants to live in the property, they dont want to sell to anyone else anymore, etc. After this, completing our due diligence became difficult as they were not providing reasonable access as per the contract terms.
  Shortly after this happened, I received a call from a competitor of mine, ***,  who is in the same industry. *** stated that *****, one of the sellers, approached him and asked him to buy their home instead. When *** spoke to me and found out that the sellers were still under contract with my company, he told the sellers that he cannot purchase the property from them at this time.
  The sellers then went and listed the property with a Realtor without my authorization. This all happened while my company was still under contract with the sellers. Once we contacted the ******* and sent them our purchase contract, the ******* removed his listing. This proves that the sellers were still looking to sell, and the reasons they gave us to cancel were false. I even had a call from the sellers friend (who said he was an attorney) threatening me with a lawsuit if I do not cancel the contract immediately. 
  
  Moving forward, since the sellers were not giving access to the property, I even offered to give a $15,000 cash advance to show good faith if they would cooperate with the original contract that they signed. They declined.
  I then hired an attorney to draft a letter stating that if we can't work out a solution, then we shall have to escalate the matter to litigation. The sellers hired their own legal counsel in response and after some back and forth via emails, their attorney advised them that were under a legally, binding contract and that they should proceed under the terms of the purchase contract. We all agreed to move forward. An addendum to the contract was signed by both me and the sellers extending both the due diligence period and the closing date (since they didnt give us access originally).
  After a few weeks of cooperation but before we got to closing, we got another email from their same attorney stating again that the sellers are cancelling the contract. They now pulled out different excuses - we werent registered in ** (we dont need to be to enter into a purchase contract) and we marketed their property on the *** (our contract gives us the explicit right to do so). Our attorney informed them that we were performing under the contract, fully intended to close as per the addendum terms, and that if the sellers dont move forward with the sale, we will file a lawsuit. The sellers son filed the BBB complaint one day after their attorney tried to cancel again.
  I believe that because I did not advance them the $100,000 before closing, or give them more money than what we originally contracted for, they unilaterally decided that they did not want to work with us anymore and tried every method they could think of to get out of the contract, when they had no legal right to do so. Real estate contracts are legally binding contracts and we abided by the terms of the contract the fact that they want more money or to get a cash advance does not give them a right to cancel or try to go around us.
  I can provide evidence of all of the above, including text messages showing the back-and-forth negotiations before the contract was signed, and their own attorney agreeing that everything was done correctly and legally. Let me know if you want me to send this over. In the meantime, I have attached the purchase contract they signed and the addendum that they signed (under advice from their attorney) extending the closing date and due diligence period.
  I do not wish to pursue legal action, I would much prefer to buy the home as per the contract that was originally signed (after much negotiation).  Please let me know if there is any more documentation you need to remove this complaint, as it is both defamatory and inaccurate. 
  
  

  Customer Answer

  Date: 06/14/2025

   
  Complaint: 23450695
  
  

  I appreciate the opportunity to formally respond to the narrative submitted by Mr. ********* of LPI Home Buyers LLC. It is important to clarify and humanize the events that have transpirednot just to correct misinformation, but to convey the deeply personal toll this experience has taken on my family.
  
  
  
  
  I am the eldest daughter of the homeowners referenced in this complaint. I returned to my parents homesacrificing my own place and stabilityto care for my aging parents and my 90-year-old grandmother, who is in the final stages of dementia. She can no longer walk without help, she struggles to chew food, and she frequently soils herself. This is the day-to-day reality inside our home.
  
  
  And yet, LPI Home Buyers continues to pursue a sale that would displace my entire family. This situation has nothing to do with a $100,000 cash advance. That is a deflective, manipulative narrative designed to shift attention away from the power imbalance and questionable legality of the contract signed on March 6thwithout legal counsel, without notarization, and without full understanding of its long-term implications.
  
  
  First and foremost, I filed the BBB complaintnot my brother, as claimed. The complaint was submitted out of sheer frustration after weeks of distress, not as retaliation for any cancelled contract or denial of a cash advance. This had nothing to do with money, but everything to do with protecting my aging parentswho were, at the time of signing, without legal representation or full comprehension of what was being agreed to. This contract was executed without a notary, without attorney review, and in a manner I now view as highly unethical.
  
  
  
  
  Mr. ********* states that the sellers have sold houses before and own another investment property in *******. They no longer own those properties, and those past real estate transactions were handled by professionals who upheld ethical standardsproviding full transparency, legal guidance, and respect. The difference in approach could not be more *****.
  
  
  Regarding the visit to ********************* in ************ they went solely at my request, to meet in person the individual who had inserted himself as POA on a draft documentan act that raised serious concerns for us, as no notarized power of attorney ever existed. The suggestion that they came to beg for a $100,000 cash advance for a business is not only unfounded, its insulting. Unless Mr. ********* can provide written proof of that claim, it should be dismissed as speculation. If my parents needed help, they could come to me. I would set myself on fire for them if that meant meeting their needs. Please do not cheapen their dignity or imply desperation where there is only fatigue and confusion.
  
  
  Mr. ********* claims that after they refused to provide a cash advance, my parents became uncooperative. That is simply not true. I was staying at the house during this time. In March and April until they took the listing down April 16th and no one else came to see it. I personally opened the door for buyers. I let in the photographer. We have camera footage confirming this. There was never any obstruction of accessonly increasing fear and uncertainty on our side as demand letters started coming in.
  
  
  Lets be very clear: the demand letter sent by **** attorney was not a gesture toward compromiseit was a threat. That letter, along with subsequent communication from Mr. ********** is what finally compelled my parents to retain legal counsel. They were under duress, emotionally worn, and rapidly losing faith in their ability to protect their home.
  
  
  At the time of the original contract signing on March 6th, 2025, they had no attorney. This was something I questioned immediately afterward. For a company that claims to operate ethically, how is it possible that this major decisionpotentially life-changing for a vulnerable older couplewas finalized without requiring independent legal review? Even your own addendum had to be signed after counsel was finally obtained. That alone tells us this deal was not handled with full balance or good faith.
  
  
  As for the notion that my parents suddenly tried to back out of a good deal with excuses, I ask that you re-read the list of reasons you dismiss so easily: illness, caregiving responsibilities, emotional stress, and family needs. My grandmother is 90 years old with late-stage dementia. She cannot walk. She soils herself. She has to be fed because she cant chew anymore. These are not excusesthese are urgent realities.
  
  
  My parents never said they wanted to rent the house to others.  My brother and I told them we would take over the home and do everything. Watching your parents break down, panic, and become physically unwell because of a contract they signed while unaware of the full implications is devastating.
  
  
  The idea that a phone call from a friend who said he was an attorney threatened Mr. ********* is also unsubstantiated. No such friend exists. We have not involved anyone outside of our immediate legal counselbecause we are a private family. That statement reads like a convenient addition to bolster a case that is crumbling under scrutiny.
  
  
  When my mother, in a moment of panic and desperation, called a realtor to explore listing the home, it wasnt an act of deception. It was an act of mental and emotional exhaustion. I was the one who spoke with her and asked her to step back, to remember the toll this was taking on our health and stability. It was me who convinced her not to list. The timing simply coincided with Mr. ********** outreach to the realtor. He did not stop the listingI did.
  
  
  Mr. ********* claims he still wants to close. That may be, but this contract should have never progressed as far as it did. Its really quite unsettling to watch someone assert moral and legal entitlement to a home they didnt buy, didnt build, didnt live in, and didnt suffer for. My parents worked decades for this house. They made sacrifices, endured struggle, and built a life there. That effort cannot be brushed aside by a signature on a paper drafted without representation or informed consent.
  
  
  Lets also stop pretending this is about high stakes. What is it that you want, Mr. ********** The $1,000 you placed in escrow two days before the original due diligence expired? The cost of the photographer? The fee to list on ***? The amount you paid your lawyer to send a threat to a fragile elderly couple? Its a rhetorical question, but the absurdity of it is obvious. And yet, the only solution that seems to matter is forcing the sale of a home that houses not just peoplebut their histories, their safety, their legacy.
  
  
  While your attorney may have told you that the contract is legally sound, I urge you to consider: is it morally sound? Predatory language, vague terms, and a process that skirted legal review until we had no choicethese are red flags for any fair-minded person. Almost every lawyer Ive consulted with has said as much. No, Im not trying to defame you. I am a business owner myself. I know how painful a damaging review can be. But I also know when its time to admit a mistake, step back, and do the right thing.
  
  
  You once said in a message to me, before you realized who I was, that youd hate to cause your clients such stress. So I ask againwhat has changed?
  
  
  If your aim is to build a business based on integrity, then walk away from this deal. Dont hold a contract over the heads of people who are suffering. Dont cling to legal technicalities when the moral cost is so obviously high.
  
  
  Lets begin with the facts Mr. ********* chooses to omit:
  
  
  Email chain confirming our request to cancel:
  April 15, 2025 7:55 AM
  From: ***** *********
  Please respect my wife and Is decision, we would like to cancel the contract. Please move forward in getting this matter done.
  April 21, 2025 Follow-up from ******* *********
  We have reviewed all the options and have decided that were going to cancel.
  
  
  Mr. ********** response that same day:
  
  
  Hello,
  Cancelling was not one of the 2 options me and your son discussed.
  Weve spent a lot of time and money on this property, so if you dont want to cooperate per the contract, youll be hearing from our attorney.
  
  
  This shows the motivation behind the addendum he later proposed. It wasnt a gesture of goodwillit was created because he began threatening legal action after my parents expressed their wish to walk away. That addendum was reactive, not proactive, and drafted solely to preserve leverage.
  
  
  Even in your own April 14th email- 
  
  
  You offered a $10,000 advance and even a further $20,000 before closingall before the deal was finalized. If this wasnt about money and control, why make such an aggressive financial offer when the sellers clearly wanted out? Your own words 
  
  
  Once again, this is highly unusual and risky for me but I do want to find a solution.
  
  
  And on the 15th my father as stated above they  STILL wanted to cancel 
  
  
  
  
  Regarding the false claim that we tried to market the property to other investors:
  
  
  That is misleading and framed to appear unethical. In truth, we made a few exploratory calls to other companiesat my directionsimply to gather information about how other investors handled distressed sales and elderly homeowners. We were seeking knowledge, not entertaining offers.
  
  
  Listing Timeline What actually happened:
  April 16, 2025
  ? The property listing was removed from MLS, the same day we requested to cancel.
  May 19, 2025
  ? The listing was reinstated by the Realtorbut only after more than a month of silence and confusion.
  
  
  If the home was not even publicly viewable between April 16 and May 19, how could we have obstructed access for interested parties? The truth is: we didnt. We werent in control of the listingMr. ********* was. The absence of showings was not obstruction. It was absence of visibility.

   

   

  
  
  Sincerely,
  
  ****** ******

  

  Business Response

  Date: 06/17/2025

  While we sympathize with what is happening with the complainants grandmother, the ******* ***** and ******* ********* are the ones we signed the purchase contract with. My understanding is that they are 58 years of age (*****), 61 years of age (*******), currently run their own import/export business, and have bought and sold investment properties in the past.  
  
  We have many back-and-forth texts between the sellers and my manager ******* ******* going over the purchase offer and terms and answering their questions. The sellers son was also involved in these negotiations, and he helped the sellers to get the purchase contract signed.
  
  After the sellers stated that they didnt want to sell to anyone and that there was a family member that was sick, they stopped communicating with us. We made several attempts to reach them. They then listed with their own Realtor even though we were still under contract with them (proof of that is attached). They also contacted a competitor of ours to sell.
  
  That friend/attorney of the sellers did in fact call and threaten legal action if we didnt cancel the contract (we can provide the phone number of that person upon request). This happened before we hired our own counsel.
  
  The sellers did in fact show up at our *********** office and ask for the $100,000 cash advance to help with their import/export business. Once the sellers tried to cancel and before we hired legal counsel, we tried to come to an amicable resolution by offering them a smaller cash advance.
  
  The reason we got an attorney involved was because even though the sellers initially did give access, they stopped responding to us despite several attempts made to reach them. Per the contract, Seller shall make the Property reasonably accessible to Buyer and its partners, contractors, and prospective clients prior to Closing.
  
  As for our attorneys actions, they were completely in line or the sellers attorney would have been the first one to inform us that they werent. The letter that our attorney sent to the sellers is attached. The sellers attorney is in fact the one that encouraged the sellers to move forward and sign the extension addendum with us, so we could complete our due diligence as originally agreed upon. If a party to a real estate contract fails to abide by the contract terms, what other legal recourse does the other party have then to hire an attorney?
  
  Real estate contracts in ******** do not have to be notarized to be legally binding it is not even standard practice. Our contract is a simple two-page contract (which we already submitted), and sellers were free to have an attorney review it. No one discouraged them from having their attorney review it. Weve had several clients in the past ask us to have their attorney review the contract before they sign, and as a company policy, we ALWAYS honor that request.
  
  Lastly, most real estate purchase contracts are structured to give the ***** has a right to cancel during their due diligence period, and if they dont, their deposit is at risk. But a seller, once entering in a purchase agreement to sell their home, does not have the unilateral right to cancel (assuming the buyer has abided with the terms of the contract). We have abided by the terms. Just because the sellers want to cancel, does not mean that our company has to agree. Furthermore, their actions of going around us to try to sell to a competitor and then listing with a ******* has rightfully caused us to question their intentions as to cancelling.
  
  The above facts and the evidence we have submitted show that nothing that my company did was unethical or illegal. To accuse us of predatory language and predatory actions is unfounded. Weve been in business since 2018, have closed several hundred transactions with sellers around the country, and have built our business on strong core values and high ethical standards.
  
  The complainant asked how we wish to resolve this  it is to have the sellers abide by the terms of the contract they signed (and the addendum they signed just a couple of weeks ago extending the closing to July 18, 2025).
  

  Customer Answer

  Date: 06/17/2025

   
  Complaint: 23450695
  
  I am rejecting this response because:
  

   

  To Whom It May Concern:
  Thank you for the opportunity to formally respond to the narrative submitted by Mr. ********* of LPI Home Buyers LLC. Its important to clarify and humanize the events that have transpirednot only to correct misinformation but to share the deeply personal toll this experience has taken on my family. Ill also address the bulleted concerns from my last message, many of which remain unacknowledged.
  
  1. Mischaracterization of My Parents Health and Background

  Mr. ********* stated:
  "While we sympathize with what is happening with the complainants grandmother, the ******* ***** and ******* ********* are the ones we signed the purchase contract with. My understanding is that they are 58 years of age (*****), 61 years of age (*******), currently run their own import/export business, and have bought and sold investment properties in the past."
  There is no clear expression of sympathy here. Referencing their age in relation to their declining health is both irrelevant and dismissive. My parents ran a small-scale export shipping business, but due to serious health concernsparticularly my motherthey are no longer involved in day-to-day operations.
  The Florida properties referenced were not investment properties. One belonged to me, and the other was our family home. These were handled through licensed real estate agents. The physical and emotional strain of upkeep forced them to move on from those homes.
  Let me be absolutely clear: this ordeal is actively harming my mother. Watching her own mothers health rapidly decline, while managing this distressing situation, has already resulted in multiple hospital visits due to stress. Everyone understands that stress is a serious health riskand if this continues to accelerate my mothers demise, I will hold all responsible parties fully accountable. Legal disputes over this house will pale in comparison to the larger consequences. I intend to protect my family without compromise.

  
  
  2. Misuse of *********** Involvement
  "The sellers son was also involved in these negotiations, and he helped the sellers to get the purchase contract signed."
  My younger brother is in his early 20s. He is not legal counsel and was never qualified to negotiate or explain legal contracts. His participation does not validate the fairness or transparency of the transaction.
  

  
  3. Access and Listing Timeline Misrepresentations
  "They stopped communicating with us... They then listed with their own Realtor even though we were still under contract..."
  This statement is misleading. I contacted the listing agent first to request the property be pulled from ***. Your follow-up email came after that.
  You also stated:
  "We made several attempts to reach them."
  Please provide specific proof of these communication attempts, including timestamps and dates. Your own demand letter dated April 24 claims:
  "Failure to provide access since April 14."
  But here are the facts:
  April 15, 2025 7:55 AM
  From: ***** *********
  Please respect my wife and Is decision. We would like to cancel the contract. Please move forward in getting this matter done.
  April 16, 2025
  ? The property was removed from MLS, following our request.
  April 21, 2025
  From: ******* *********
  We have reviewed all the options and have decided that were going to cancel.
  Your response that same day:
  Cancelling was not one of the 2 options me and your son discussed. Weve spent a lot of time and money on this property, so if you dont want to cooperate per the contract, youll be hearing from our attorney.
  How can a conversation with my brother, who is not a legal party or representative, override written communication from the sellers themselves?
  
  Follow-Up: Clarification on Claimed Obstructed Access
  Lets examine the verified Listing Timeline:
  April 16, 2025 ? Property removed from MLS (same day we requested cancellation)
  April 30, 2025 ? Listing briefly reinstated
  May 2, 2025 ? Listing removed again
  May 19, 2025 ? Listing finally reinstated
  If access was obstructed, was that before or after April 16? Because after the listing was pulled, no showings were scheduled. Prior to that, I personally facilitated every single visit and have contact information for all involved agents as proof.
  Please provide names, times, and attempted access dates. We will cross-reference with our home security logs.
  

  
  4. The So-Called Friend/Attorney
  "That friend/attorney of the sellers did in fact call and threaten legal action."
  Please provide the name and phone number of the individual youre referencing. Any legitimate attorney would clearly identify themselves. This claim is unsubstantiated and speculative.
  

  
  5. Office Visit and the $100,000 Cash Advance
  "The sellers showed up to our North Miami office and asked for $100,000 for their import/export business."
  That is false. I asked my parents to visit your office to see who you were. Needed to put a face to a name. Had we found someone to care for my grandmother, I would have accompanied them. Your characterization that they begged for money is not only inaccurateit is deeply disrespectful. If they needed financial help, I would have got on my very large social media platform and lit myself on fire for the funds. Do not cheapen their dignity. Unless you have a written record of this alleged $100,000 request, this statement should be withdrawn.
  

  
  6. Alleged Lack of Cooperation and Legal Justification
  The reason we got an attorney involved was because... they stopped responding to us.
  This is directly contradicted by our documented email trail. We attempted to cancel the contract in writing, yet you responded with threats and pressure rather than acknowledgment or cooperation.
  
  7. Role of the Sellers Attorney
  "The sellers attorney encouraged them to sign the extension addendum..."
  That advice was based on incomplete information. Our attorney was unaware that the listing had been taken downan essential detail that changed the entire context of the situation. I had to intervene personally to clarify that timeline.
  

  
  8. Ethical Concerns
  "Nothing my company did was unethical or illegal."
  I never claimed illegality. I said your conduct felt predatoryand it still does. You are attempting to extract a home from a vulnerable family navigating emotional and medical trauma. Your stated company values ring hollow when we are buried under threats, pressure, and disregard for our wellbeing.
  I left my own home and career to return and care for my parents. That is the reality I live innot hypotheticals, not legal threats. I dont need to publicly detail my mothers medical conditions, but if necessary, I am willing to submit video documentation of her current state. No one is trying to ******* their way out of a contractthis is not about money when you are fighting for your health.
  We want to live in peace, heal in peace, and handle the realities of aging and terminal illness without being preyed upon.
  
  Please advise on next steps. We remain open to a resolution that does not including selling my home as I now live herebut not one forced through manipulation, coercion, or disregard for basic human dignity.

  Customer Answer

  Date: 06/18/2025

  Additional ***************************** of Attorney and Contract Process
  
  
  Thank you for the opportunity to offer further clarification regarding the documentation and timeline involved in our familys experience with LPI Home Buyers LLC.
  
  
  1. Missing Power of Attorney Document
  
  
  In the original submission, LPI Home Buyers included the two-page contract but omitted a very important document: a separate authorization in which the sellers, my parents , are said to have given limited power of attorney to Mr. ******* ********* and LPI Home Buyers.
  
  
  why wasnt it included in the initial documentation?
  
  
  2. Power of Attorney Must Be Notarized in ********
  
  
  While its true that real estate contracts in ******** do not need to be notarized to be valid, this particular document is different. Its not just a contract its a power of attorney, which gives someone else permission to act and sign on the sellers behalf.
  
  
  In ********, for a power of attorney to be enforceable, it typically needs to be notarized  especially when it involves real estate. Some types even require two witnesses.
  
  
  After doing my own due diligence and speaking with trusted contacts in the real estate field, it became clear that the document being referenced does not meet those basic requirements. It lacks notarization and uses vague language making its legal strength highly questionable.
  
  
  3. Timeline for ********************************
  
  
  The company also stated that the sellers were welcome to have an attorney review the contract, and that this is something they always support. Thats good in theory, but in this case, the reality was different.
  
  
  The contract stated it had to be signed by March 7, but the final version was signed on March 6. This left, at most, a 24-hour window for my elderly parents to find a lawyer, get a review, and fully understand the terms. that kind of rushed timeline didnt leave much room for thoughtful consideration or professional advice.
  
  
  Final Thoughts
  
  
  Between the lack of notarization on the power of attorney, the omission of that document from the submitted records, and the unrealistic time frame provided to seek counsel, there are several red flags that deserve a closer look.
  
  
  We raise these concerns not to escalate matters, but to highlight how confusing and overwhelming this process became
  
  
  Thank you for your time and attention.