Complaints

This profile includes complaints for Clutter's headquarters and its corporate-owned locations. To view all corporate locations, see Find Local Branches.

close

Find a Location

Clutter has 8 locations, listed below.

*This company may be headquartered in or have additional locations in another country. Please click on the country abbreviation in the search box below to change to a different country location.

BBB accredited

Near

Country

USUnited States

Please enter a valid location.

Filter

• 

  Clutter

  3526 Hayden Ave Culver City, CA 90232-2413

• 

  Clutter Self-Storage

  280 Fullerton Ave Yonkers, NY 10704

• 

  Clutter

  19801 85th S Kent, WA 98031

• 

  Clutter Self-Storage

  1 Holland Ave White Plains, NY 10603-3317

• 

  Clutter Self-Storage

  5601 Foster Ave Brooklyn, NY 11234-1027

  

The complaint text that is displayed might not represent all complaints filed with BBB. Some consumers may elect to not publish the details of their complaints, some complaints may not meet BBB's standards for publication, or BBB may display a portion of complaints when a high volume is received for a particular business.

• Initial Complaint

  Date:02/08/2023

  Type:Service or Repair Issues
  Status:

  AnsweredMore info

  Complaint statuses

  Resolved:

  The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.

  Unresolved:

  The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.

  Answered:

  The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.

  Unanswered:

  The business failed to respond to the dispute.

  Unpursuable:

  BBB is unable to locate the business.

  Clutter Storage Company We removed all our property from Clutter to bring it to a local Storage Space near our home.When our property was delivered we discovered that several pieces of heavy, well-built furniture had been destroyed. Not scratched or dented, but smashed with reckless negligence.Please see photos attached.We are also completely missing a very large (4 feet by 8 feet by 1/2" thick) glass top to one of our tables which we assume has been lost or smashed too.Clutter is offering a $1,200 settlement for damage that will cost in excess of $10,000 to address fully.Given their total negligence - being held to the coverage their insurance offers is just not acceptable.

  Business Response

  Date: 02/18/2023

  Clutter is a full-service storage company. For a charge Clutter packs, moves, and stores a customers items. MakeSpace was acquired by Clutter in February 2022 and offered the same service. All customers who continued storing after this date automatically became Clutter customers and agreed to Clutter's terms. The customer began their MakeSpace ********************** term on Aug 6, 2019, and ended their term on Jan 19, 2023. The customer did not purchase a higher protection plan so their items were covered under MakeSpace's minimum coverage of $0.60/lb per item. After becoming a Clutter customer, the minimum coverage was matched to Clutter's equivalent coverage of $1/lb per item.
  
  On Jan 19, 2023, the customer contacted our support team after discovering items were damaged and missing during their return. 2 tables were damaged, 1 desktop was missing, and 1 glass top for one of the damaged tables was missing. The customer reported that the desktop we delivered wasnt there and sent it back to storage. 
  
  The customer began filing a claim on Jan 19  and did not submit it until Jan 31. The customer's items were evaluated at $1/lb in accordance with their protection plan. After a warehouse search, we could not locate the missing items and so Clutter took liability for the loss and damage. An initial assessment of $722 was made based on their item weight but as a courtesy, an increased offer of $1,222 was sent instead of the $1/lb $722 offer. 
  
  The customer disputed this offer and a final offer of $1500 was made. The customer refused this offer as well and has threatened small claims court.
  
  Clutter acknowledged the mistake made in handling these items and outline damage or loss in our Limited Security Warranty Policy. We are committed to resolving this issue and will continue auditing our warehouse for these missing items and continue working with the customer. Should these items be found, we will return them at once. 
  
  **********************************************************************
  
  "Clutter will reimburse you for: Loss of or damage to your properly packed Stored Items that have been tampered with, lost or stolen while in Clutter's possession, up to a total maximum of US $1.00 per pound in aggregate per User (the "Limited Security Warranty");
  and/or damage to your personal effects caused by Clutters gross negligence or willful misconduct, up to a total maximum of US $1.00 per pound in aggregate per User"
  
  

• Initial Complaint

  Date:01/08/2023

  Type:Customer Service Issues
  Status:

  AnsweredMore info

  Complaint statuses

  Resolved:

  The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.

  Unresolved:

  The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.

  Answered:

  The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.

  Unanswered:

  The business failed to respond to the dispute.

  Unpursuable:

  BBB is unable to locate the business.

  I have been using Makespace for years to store off-season clothing with no issues. Clutter purchased Makespace and this is where the problems began. **************** makes it nearly impossible to get an answer to a question and when you do it's often wrong. The cost of storing my items tripled with Makespace was purchased and was out of my price range so I scheduled an appointment to have my items delivered. The day before the scheduled delivery date I was informed that two of my boxes of clothing (totaling about $24,000 worth of clothing, every stitch of spring/summer clothing that I own) would not be delivered because they were having trouble locating it. I have repeatedly asked if these boxes were ever delivered to the warehouse in the first place, no answer. I have asked when was the last time my boxes were known to be in the warehouse, no answer. What do they mean by "searching for my items," no answer. I was first told to wait two weeks before filing a claim then was told that they cannot look for my items without me filing a claim first. A week after filing the claim I asked for an update and was told to look for a section of my account page that did not even exist and that I would get an update in about 4 days. The following day my claim was closed. When I disputed my claim I was told I could not dispute more than once, I had not yet filed one. This whole system is extremely disorganized and disjointed. I have no idea if Clutter was ever in possession of my items in the first place. I want to know if my items were ever scanned as having been received by the warehouse. I want to know when the last time my items were scanned. I want to know what "looking for my items" entails. I want to know why if they lost nearly 100 items I'm only being paid out for 2 items. I want to know why I was instructed to spend hours researching the price of each item in storage and then was never able to submit that information.

  Business Response

  Date: 01/17/2023

  Clutter is a full-service storage company. For a fee Clutter packs, moves, and stores an individual's items. ******************************* originally stored their items with MakeSpace storage beginning on 3/31/15, which was acquired by Clutter in 2022.
  
  ******* scheduled a final return of her items on 4/22/22. Unfortunately four of ********* items were not returned, which were labeled as four bins of summer and spring clothing. Clutter has a specific process for missing items; we reached out to our warehouse team to conduct a thorough search for the missing items, and unfortunately they were not located. While Clutter takes the utmost care to prevent situations like this from happening, unfortunately things like this do occur from time to time with every storage company, and the likelihood is that this occurred during the MakeSpace acquisition. We are unable to confirm whether the items made it to the warehouse due to the acquisition and the fact that MakeSpace is no longer an existing company, therefore we do not have access to MakeSpace's database.
  
  ******* filed two claims for the missing items, claim #***f827b and claim #****c4ac. ******* had elected to purchase the Legacy Protection Plan through MakeSpace, which covers up to $250.00/item. Since the items were not located, she was offered a total of $1,000.00 ($250.00 per bin) amongst claims #***f827b and #****c4ac. She initially only filed for two of the four boxes via claim #***f827b, never accepted the offer, and then filed another claim for the other two boxes and included the previous two boxes that were offered monetary resolution on the prior claim. She was offered $250.00 per box on the new claim, but denied for the previous boxes as we already offered her compensation under the first claim. She had the opportunity to accept these amounts and be reimbursed to the fullest extent of her protection plan. Instead, ******* filed an additional three claims which were treated as duplicate filings and denied. ******* wrote in the claims that she does not want money, she only wants her items and will continue to file duplicate claims until her items are found.
  
  While we understand the frustration of losing items, unfortunately Clutter has already exhausted all efforts to locate the items and they were not found; therefore she was offered monetary resolution, which ******* did not accept. Therefore, her claims were closed. Should ******* wish to accept the monetary resolution we have offered on her claims, she simply needs to reach out to us and we would be happy to reopen the claims and resubmit the offers to her. Furthermore, Clutter never ceases looking for missing items, even in the event of an accepted claim offer. Therefore, should these items be located in a future audit, ******* will be notified immediately and we will arrange a free return of her items to her.
  

  Customer Answer

  Date: 01/22/2023

  (The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
  The individual who responded to this complaint clearly did not fully review my case. There are only two bins in question. Each bin is listed twice, but with different bin numbers and different photographs. Had the person responding to my complaint actually reviewed my case, they would know this and have seen the correspondence between Clutter and me explaining this. As someone who works with databases for a living and works for a company that has acquired other companies, I do not accept the statement that they are unable to answer the question of whether my items had ever arrived at the warehouse. Clutter is still using the same item numbers that Makespace placed on items, therefor they imported Makespace's into their own database and should be able to track the actions of the bins. The representative was able to tell me why my bins had duplicate numbers therefore Clutter does have information about the bins when the bins were held by Makespace. Furthermore, if we were to accept the idea that they could no longer access information about items that had been put into storage by Makespace, how are they able to find any items within their warehouses that were previously owned by Makespace? They were able to find the box that had my A/C in it which went into storage after those bins and my radiator which went into storage before my bins. Also, if they are not able to access any information that had been in Makespace's database, how could they even begin to look for my bins in their warehouse at all? This does not add up and sounds like an excuse to not actually look for my items. What does "exhausted all efforts" even mean? Does it mean that someone has walked up and down every aisle with a photograph of my two bins looking on every shelf and behind other items?
  
  The fact that the person who responded to this complaint did not take the time to fully review my case and the correspondence that has taken place between Clutter and me shows that Clutter is not taking this case seriously. I, therefore, do not accept their response. The monetary settlement does not begin to cover the value of the items that they lost. Additionally, if Clutter does not have access to the Makespace database then how do they know what type of protection plan I purchased? The reason why I put in claims for the bins under different numbers was that it was (is) unclear to me which bin number Makespace/Clutter has listed the whereabouts of my bins under. I filed the claim under all the bin numbers to initiate the search for the bins under all the bin numbers, something which a Clutter representative told me to do, if the person who responded to this complaint had taken my complaint seriously and read my correspondence, they would have known this.

  Business Response

  Date: 03/15/2023

  Clutter acquired MakeSpace in 2020 and began transitioning MakeSpace customers to Clutter. During the transition, customers information with MakeSpace was transferred over (such as claim history, protection plan, account notes, and more). ********* protection plan was $250 per item with a total maximum payout of $2,000. ******* filed a claim for the missing items in question, and they were paid out in line with their protection plan, as the Clutter could not locate the items claimed. 

• Initial Complaint

  Date:12/27/2022

  Type:Billing Issues
  Status:

  AnsweredMore info

  Complaint statuses

  Resolved:

  The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.

  Unresolved:

  The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.

  Answered:

  The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.

  Unanswered:

  The business failed to respond to the dispute.

  Unpursuable:

  BBB is unable to locate the business.

  I started using the Clutter.com storage service on September 2nd, 2019 and closed my account on September 3rd, 2022. My account # is **************. I have two significant complaints both about misleading service ******** - 1. Clutter purposefully delayed account closing and overcharged me one more month of due after returning all my belongings. My Clutter monthly recurring charge happened on the 2nd day of each month. On August 29, 2022, I requested to close my account and return all my belongings. Clutter didn't make such service delivery until 6 days later on September 3rd, 2022, a time when they made another charge of the full monthly due of $265.50 for the billing period of September 2nd to October 2nd, 2022, a service never ever happened. 2. Clutter.com continuously and increasingly added up the monthly charges from the contracted initially $126/month plan all the way to $264.50/month in three years. Specifically, Clutter.com hiked 30% from $126/month to $164/month in the first7 service months when it was Mar 2020, then $183.68/month in Dec 2020, then$220.42/month in Sep 2021, then $264.50/month in Jun 2022. Clutter used the bait-and-switch scam for their service marketing. When I originally signed the contract in 2019, they promised the free-return-delivery, however, I had to pay for the truck and moving service fee of $368.79 to close my account with Clutter.com. I could not take back my belongings due to COVID, and Clutter took advantage of it and overcharged me during that time.

  Business Response

  Date: 01/21/2023

  Clutter, Inc is a household goods moving business that provides item storage within warehouses. For a fee, Clutter packs, wraps, and transports a customer's belongings from their chosen pickup location to our warehouse and provides an accessible online inventory of stored belongings.
  
  On 9/2/19 the customer began their ********************** term, closed on 9/3/22, and was billed on the 2nd of each month. Upon joining Clutter, all customers must agree to our Terms Of Use which outlines our payment agreement.
  
  ************************************************
  
  "By using the Services, or other paid services or products provided by Clutter, you agree to our pricing and payment terms, as we may update them from time to time. Clutter may add new Services for additional fees and charges, or amend fees and charges for existing Services, at any time, in its sole discretion."
  
  Clutter may occasionally increase services fees and on 4/30/22, the customer was notified of price changes that would affect their final return pricing on 6/2/22. We informed the customer of their new final return fees of a $251.36 service charge + $78 per appointment hour. The customer continued storing with ********************** after receiving this message.
  
  On 9/7/22, the customer opened an issue claim via their ********************** account to voice their concerns with appointment availability and to request final month proration. The customer explained that they attempted to book an appointment on 8/29/22 for a date before their 9/2/22 bill with the earliest availability being on 9/3/22.
  
  Unfortunately, all appointments are set on a first-come, first-serve basis. We encourage customers to schedule final returns several weeks ahead of their billing cycle to avoid unnecessary charges. The claim was denied for this reason but instructions on automatic final-month proration were sent to the customer.
  
  On 1/12/23, our ************** team reached out via phone call to the customer in response to this ******************** complaint. We informed the customer that automatic final month proration steps were sent to the customer via their claim denial. The customer seemed unaware of this. All claim determinations are visible via the customer's account portal and sent to the email associated with their account. We guided the customer through the automated refund steps and our system refunded the customer on the same day.
  
  The customer was billed $264.50 for their 9/2-10/2 cycle and received a refund of $255.68 for their unused days between 9/3-10/2. By policy, we do not prorate storage payments but offer this automated process as a courtesy. This policy is visible in our ************
  
  "Clutter does not prorate the final month of storage. Please book any final return appointments at least ******************************* your billing cycle to avoid an additional month of storage costs. ***************** are subject to availability."
  
  ******************************************************************
  

• Initial Complaint

  Date:12/23/2022

  Type:Service or Repair Issues
  Status:

  AnsweredMore info

  Complaint statuses

  Resolved:

  The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.

  Unresolved:

  The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.

  Answered:

  The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.

  Unanswered:

  The business failed to respond to the dispute.

  Unpursuable:

  BBB is unable to locate the business.

  Clutter broke an acrylic table during return of my items from storage. Their representatives told me at the time of return that they would cover the damage up to the full value of any insurance that I purchased with them during my storage period. I purchased the maximum amount of insurance coverage available from them in the amount of ******* They refuse to provide the full insurance coverage for my item despite the fact that I have sent them the internet link to the item showing the replacement value of the item, which is greater than the ****** insurance value.

  Business Response

  Date: 01/19/2023

  Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2022/12/30) */
  Clutter, Inc is a household good moving business that provides item storage within warehouses. For a fee, Clutter packs, wraps, and transports a customer's belongings from their chosen pickup location to our warehouse and provides an accessible online inventory of stored belongings. On June 17, 2021, the complainant, **** *****, hired our pickup and packing services for storage.
  
  By default, all items are covered under our free, minimum protection plan of $1/lb which covers loss or damage while in our care. We also offer paid protection plans to cover loss or damage up to $1,000 and $2,500. **** purchased our $2,500 plan for $25 a month while using our services.
  
  On November 19, 2022, **** closed his account with Clutter and removed all items from storage. On November 20th, 2022, **** filed an item claim for damage to his stored acrylic table with a declared value of $3,415. A member of our Trust & Safety team reviewed his claim and followed standard review practices. A receipt was not uploaded with the claim so a similar item was used to determine item value and an initial offer of $1,110 was sent.
  
  On November 22, 2022, **** disputed the claim offer and an email correspondence was established with our Trust & Safety team. Despite repeated requests for a purchase invoice, **** did not provide one and so our $1,110 offer remained.
  
  On December 23, 2022, **** disputed the claim offer again over social media, and his claim was re-reviewed.
  
  Upon further review, an offer of $3,415 was made to meet ****'s declared value. This offer went above ****'s standard limit of $2,500 and was accepted on December 23rd. We then requested an update on his social media postings to reflect this mutually agreeable resolution to which **** agreed.
  
  As the new offer has been accepted, Clutter recognizes this complaint as resolved and has closed our active correspondence with ****.

• Initial Complaint

  Date:12/19/2022

  Type:Sales and Advertising Issues
  Status:

  ResolvedMore info

  Complaint statuses

  Resolved:

  The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.

  Unresolved:

  The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.

  Answered:

  The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.

  Unanswered:

  The business failed to respond to the dispute.

  Unpursuable:

  BBB is unable to locate the business.

  Hired Clutter to do a move for me yesterday, 12/18/22, in a studio apartment with a queen ********* a lightweight disassembled bed frame, a lightweight arm chair, a small 2 seater-dining table, a 5-drawer vertical dresser with all the drawers already removed and moved myself, a desk, a 32-inch tv completely sealed in the box, and four small bookshelves light enough to be lifted by one person. Every other piece of small furniture and box was moved myself. Both apartments were on the first floor with a cleared path from the truck to the door that was no more than 50 feet. The lead mover commented that this was a partial move, and the next destination was 10 minutes down the road (billed for a ************************************** my driveway for 5 minutes, I watched them from the end of the road). At $187/hour, and a website that claims the average move costs $212, I expected to pay $212 tops. instead, the movers took over two hours and I was charged a total of FOUR HUNDRED AND TWO DOLLARS. When I complained that the movers had been slow (it took just over an hour to pack my apartment), I was told I was charged fairly because they came in under time??? I watched them walk slowly, and wrap my furniture hilariously slow. The movers clearly took advantage of a single female who didn't feel comfortable going inside alone with two strange men to complain. The website estimated an hour, at $187 for the full move. This is wildly inaccurate advertising, and there's no real way to stop the service once its started. I had the movers leave all the furniture in the middle of the room and they even left bags and bubble wrap on them, because I said I couldn't afford any longer. Magically, when I said I couldn't afford this, they unloaded the whole truck in 23 minutes.If the advertised average apartment costs $212, and I was charged $402 for a studio apartment, I guess the "average" apartment is next door to the new one, has 3 pieces of small furniture and nothing else inside

  Customer Answer

  Date: 12/22/2022

  This has been resolved. ******* is amazing. Thank you!!

  Customer Answer

  Date: 12/22/2022

  ******* (amazing, thank you) resolved this with me. I'd like to close the case.

  Customer Answer

  Date: 12/22/2022

  ******* at Clutter solved this. Thank you!!

  Customer Answer

  Date: 12/22/2022

  *******, who is amazing, solved this. Thank you!!

• Initial Complaint

  Date:12/14/2022

  Type:Service or Repair Issues
  Status:

  AnsweredMore info

  Complaint statuses

  Resolved:

  The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.

  Unresolved:

  The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.

  Answered:

  The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.

  Unanswered:

  The business failed to respond to the dispute.

  Unpursuable:

  BBB is unable to locate the business.

  I'm writing because I have some pretty substantial concerns about my recent service with Clutter. Unfortunately, upon delivery of my stored items, I'm writing again regarding two claims that I've had to file as a result of gross negligence on the part of Clutter. I was told by the mover that HE had filed the dispute, but after speaking with a Clutter rep from the trust and safety team this morning, I was told that that was impossible. (So he lied.)The first has been marked resolved--repairs for broken dresser and couch. While the dresser is likely reparable, the couch was:a) destroyed BY Clutter staff (please see photos in claim) and b) necessary parts for repair were LOST by Clutter staff (legs, screws).I was granted a total of $200 to repair the new (1 year old) sofa that was taken safely from my home and destroyed while in the care of Clutter. To repurchase the exact same couch would cost me over $2,000. A $400 reimbursement is not acceptable. The second issue is with MISSING items. I was SHOCKED yesterday to have been told by the Clutter moving team that my bed was lost. A whole bed--which was also new (1 year old)-- gone with no recourse!? The bed cost nearly 2k and I have not yet received information regarding Clutter's decision about reimbursement. Again, I was told by the mover that I should have gotten an email alerting me of the loss of the bed, but of course I did not.Clutter has offered tiny amounts for expensive items, even citing my insurance coverage for the MISSING items. This is after being charged 2.5x our original agreed-upon amount.

  Business Response

  Date: 12/15/2022

  
  Clutter, Inc is a household goods moving business that provides item storage within warehouses. For a fee, Clutter packs, wraps, and moves a customer's belongings from one residence to another within one of our operative service areas. On June 21, 2022, the complainant, ***********************, hired Clutter to provide a pickup and packing service. The customer scheduled a return of her items on December 7, 2022. The customer had paid for additional protection of her items for a maximum amount of $1,000.00. Per Clutter's policy, once this maximum level of coverage is exhausted, any additional claims will be evaluated at a $1/lb/item basis. As per Clutter's Limited Security Warranty:
  
  "If you purchase additional coverage and then at any point reach your maximum total claim amount, Clutter will immediately cancel any later scheduled monthly protection plan payments from you and default your Limited Security Warranty coverage down to a total maximum of US $1.00 per pound in aggregate."
  
  The customer filed two claims, the first of which was for damage to a couch and dresser. Both items had a leg broken off. The ************** Specialist who reviewed the claim estimated that the items could be repaired for around $200.00 apiece. As such, the customer was offered resolution of $400.00, which she accepted. She was also advised she could submit repair invoices if the repair ended up costing more than what was offered, which she never did. She then filed a second claim for a lost king *** frame with headboard and a lost television stand. After already accepting the offer for $400.00, the customer had a remainder of $600.00 under her coverage limit. This was maxed out by offering her compensation for the *** frame with headboard in the amount of $600.00. Therefore, the television was paid out based on average weight in the amount of $38.06. The customer accepted this resolution as well.
  
  Regarding the rate, the customer agreed to and signed documents stating that the final return fee would be $579.00 and labor at $39.00/hour. The customer was charged $136.50 for a total of 3.5 hours of labor in addition to the final return fee.
  

• Initial Complaint

  Date:12/12/2022

  Type:Customer Service Issues
  Status:

  AnsweredMore info

  Complaint statuses

  Resolved:

  The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.

  Unresolved:

  The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.

  Answered:

  The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.

  Unanswered:

  The business failed to respond to the dispute.

  Unpursuable:

  BBB is unable to locate the business.

  Company refusing to close my account!!! I've sent at least 14 emails, called 3 times. They told me one thing on the phone saying I don't owe any money then 1 minute later send email still demanding the money. Not bound by contract!! They are ******** and ********* Since they took over ********* they doubled the rates too! They damaged my items on the last delivery and are refusing to compensate so I want to close my acct and they won't! They offered me *** to replace a **** ****** Please get these scammers out of my life.

  Business Response

  Date: 01/25/2023

  Business Response /* (1000, 9, 2023/01/03) */
  Clutter, Inc is a household goods moving business that provides item storage within warehouses. For a fee, Clutter packs, wraps, and moves a customer's belongings from one residence to another within one of our operative service areas. Clutter does not accept in-person returns at our warehouse facility locations as a matter of on-site safety for customers and employees. On June 2, 2019, the complainant, ******** *********, hired our services within our ******** area of service.
  
  ********* was notified ahead of time in multiple instances of changes to terms of service that would come along with the merger between ************* Clutter and chose to continue using our storage service. Prior to putting her items into storage, the complainant was able to purchase additional protection for up to $2500 in aggregate on her account for losses and damages to her stored items and neglected to do so, for the entire 3 years that the complainant had stored with Clutter the issue was never raised. Upon return of a suitcase on Dec 11, 2022, the item was discovered to be damaged. ********* filed a claim for this item and was paid out based on the protection terms on her account. *********'s original agreement with ********* was to protect her items under $0.60/lb however, this was automatically upgraded to $1/lb upon ingestion into Clutter. The settlement for her claim was paid out in full accordance with her account's protection and is above the legally required minimum for damage payouts. The customer disputed the offer due to a misunderstanding of Clutter's Terms of Service, claiming "You have calculated compensation based on weight which doesn't agree with the terms and conditions."
  
  Additionally, on December 7, 2022 ********* booked a return of her items for Dec 11, 2022. Clutter customers have the convenience of booking their own appointments through their account portal in which they can review their stored inventory and select which items they would like to have returned. For the appointment in question all but one of *********' stored items were scheduled to be returned. ********* had a period between the booking of her return and December 9, 2022 to review the items she had scheduled to return to notice a single item had not been selected and correct the error. However, ********* chose instead to claim that the confirmation email sent to her in advance of the appointment was unclear and to foist liability for the mistake onto Clutter. For this error, the complainant demanded a waiver of the disposal fee for her remaining inventory. Clutter typically charges a disposal fee to cover the operational and landfill costs of disposing of a customer's inventory but will waive this fee in specific circumstances. A Trust and Safety specialist reviewed ********* account and she did not qualify for the waiver so her claim was denied.
  
  
  As ********* continued to escalate the matter the Trust and Safety specialist chose to make an exception for her as a gesture of customer appreciation and on Dec 14, 2022 a new settlement offer was made for $115 for *********** issue claim for waiver of the valid disposal fee which is equivalent to a 68% discount for the disposal fee. ********* accepted the offer on the same day. ********* has since claimed that Clutter is now "harassing" her for attempting to contact her via email in order to resolve this issue and assist her in taking the necessary steps to close her account. As of *** 3rd, 2023 ********* has still not closed her account by scheduling her items for return or disposal despite accepting Clutter's customer appreciation offer for a generously discounted service fee. ********* antithetically claims that Clutter is both ignoring her outreach attempts and is also harassing her. ********* opened her claims on Dec 11 and they were reviewed and closed by Clutter specialists on Dec 12. After receiving these claim determinations, ********* began claiming harassment and began refusing our attempts to reach a resolution for this issue.
  
  
  Consumer Response /* (3000, 11, 2023/01/03) */
  (The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
  I would like to request that you please ensure my name is not publicly posted on your website as Clutter chose to include it at least 5 times in their above response which violates my privacy.
  Clutter was contacted via my phone call to advise them that the rug was missing. And the email they initially send when you book the rerun of your items does not list all items to be returned so there is a lack of consistency in their response. Most importantly, they never notified me of all these changes in fees- my original contract was with *********, who never charged these outrageous fees, and never damaged my items. They had much better policies and I actually don't have ANY contract with Clutter currently or in the past months. They never sent me any renewal contract or email to acknowledge these outrageous terms or fees in the first place. Before, with ********* I would be able to retrieve my items for a nominal fee and they even had a 15 minute window where you can return them on the same day. Then in December they damaged my suitcase and are still refusing to acknowledge that. The claim that was opened on December 11 was opened a second time and when I open the claim status, it was already termed, as "accepted". When I try to enter my account online, it doesn't allow me to do anything else or even accept it as the status is already excepted and I have told them this information and emails several times I have requested at least 10 emails and five phone calls requesting them to close my account and that I want no further information or contact from them. They continue to send numerous emails per day in December to the point that it was extremely ************ It took time away from my work and my life at home and my and taking care of my child. I still do not have clear instructions from them on how to close this account other than to pay them more money they went ahead and tried to authorize a charge again for January even though I have sent at least 10 emails requesting to close this account. I have not received any refund or monetary payments for my damaged suitcase either! They have not responded to me today once I told them I contacted ***. I have attached my email.
  There is also no way to terminate my account and they are bullying me to abide by rules that I have never agreed to and they seem to be making up as they go. Please please help me get rid of these bullies!
  PS. I also attached a confirmation email that I've read that does not list exactly which items are being returned. Therefore, I could not verify the rug was there or not. But I did call them to let them know. Also my name is NOT ********.
  
  
  Business Response /* (4000, 17, 2023/01/23) */
  The complainant continues to misunderstand the service provided. The complainant's rug is not and has never been missing, the item has been in storage since the complainant stored it with us. The attachment the complainant has shared very clearly has included a button labeled "View and Update Your Order Here." The complainant neglected to perform basic customer diligence and did not check which items she scheduled for return and continues to try to eschew responsibility for mistakenly omitting a single item from her return order onto ********
  
  The complainant continues to demonstrate a lack of understanding of the terms of service. ********* and ******* merged in March of 2022 and a former ********* founder is now Clutter **** All ********* customers were notified of the merger in three separate instances ahead of time via email. Additionally, ********* updated terms of service before ******* and ********* merged and stopped offering many of the services that the complainant references.
  
  The complainant's claim for her suitcase was settled in a timely manner and was paid out based on the protection terms on her account. The complainant's original agreement with ********* was to protect her items under ******** however, this was automatically upgraded to ***** upon ingestion into ******** The settlement for her claim was paid out in full accordance with her account's protection and is above the legally required minimum for damage payouts. The customer disputed the offer due to a misunderstanding of Clutter's Terms of Service, claiming "You have calculated compensation based on weight which doesn't agree with the terms and conditions."
  
  The complainant claims to have never signed a contract with Clutter demonstrating a misunderstanding of our terms of service. From section 1. A - Eligibility of Clutter's terms of service:
  
  "This is a contract between you and Clutter. You must read and agree to these Terms before using the Site or Service. If you do not agree to these Terms, you may not use the Service. You may use the Site or Service only if you can form a binding contract with Clutter, and only in compliance with these Terms and all applicable local, state, national, and international laws, rules, and regulations. "
  
  The complainant had ample notice and time to opt out of the service had she felt uncomfortable with out terms but chose instead to continue using the service and thus accepting the terms. The complainant has been informed that Clutter does not manage accounts on customer's behalf and has been instructed on the steps to close her account multiple times, all of which have gone unheeded. The customer has been offered a highly discounted rate for a valid disposal fee we charge to cover landfill and operational costs of disposing of customer inventory. The customer refuses to confirm these details and has taken no steps to close her account in order to avoid paying these valid fees.
  
  
  Consumer Response /* (4200, 19, 2023/01/23) */
  Thank you for your attention in this matter. What is highly disturbing is that they are claiming I stated the rug is missing, which is an outright lie and he's not documented in any of the emails, nor in the correspondence I have sent the ***. They keep requesting additional money for me to close the account. This is unprofessional and bullying behavior. I have never agreed to the terms Nor signed a contract with clutter. I never agreed for clutter to manage my items, especially under these conditions and extreme fees. I would like *** to simply close my account with them and have them reimburse me for any additional charges and my suitcase.
  
  
  Consumer Response /* (-5, 24, 2023/01/24) */
  I would just like to reiterate that they posted my FULL NAME and that violates my confidentiality. Please remove my name from their response. Can you advise?

• Initial Complaint

  Date:12/07/2022

  Type:Customer Service Issues
  Status:

  AnsweredMore info

  Complaint statuses

  Resolved:

  The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.

  Unresolved:

  The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.

  Answered:

  The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.

  Unanswered:

  The business failed to respond to the dispute.

  Unpursuable:

  BBB is unable to locate the business.

  Clutter egregiously misquoted us to lock ** into a move and storage plan and then immediately hiked the price for pickup, storage, and moving. Their customer service will close claims without resolution and will lead the customer on a confusing path of emails, calls etc that often go unanswered. Clutter will hold possessions hostage claiming "unsigned" documents that the client was never made aware of. They claimed texts were sent with the document and hold the customer responsible for technology and process breakdowns on their end. They claim these documents were part of the pre-service process but were never signed. If something is required, they should make sure it's signed before taking possessions of clients. They failed to complete the full service, leaving us with a bed frame and headboard. We had to call and pay another company to pick it up. It resulted in us throwing away an item that was expensive and in our original quote (somehow we still had to pay for more room than quoted). According to their moving team, they were understaffed and we had to pay more for the additional hours it took them to pack up a small one bedroom apartment. The company's process for assessing prices is purposely confusing and misleading. When finally given the chance to speak with a human, their customer service team could not adequately make sense of the additional charges. Our possessions were picked up and moved to storage in August. We were forced to pay nearly double our original quote, even though less items were stored than originally quoted. We attempted resolution since the move without adequate responses from Clutter.We have to continue paying for storage even though we want to remove our stuff. Because they possess your belongings they know they can charge whatever they want. They take advantage of the delicate nature the client is in, knowing they cannot access their possessions.

  Business Response

  Date: 12/20/2022

  Clutter, Inc is a household goods moving business that provides item storage within warehouses. For a fee, Clutter packs, wraps, and moves a customer's belongings from one residence to another within one of our operative ******* areas. Clutter does not accept in-person returns at our warehouse facility locations as a matter of on-site safety for customers and employees. On August 1, 2022, the complainant, ********** and *************************, hired our *******s within our New York area of *******.
  
  The customer states that their appointment was misquoted and then prices were increased. Clutter's *******s are unlike most moving and storage *******s in that Clutter will photograph, input measurements for storage purposes, and add items to a customer's inventory while also loading or unloading items into our vehicles. This ******* does take some additional time as compared to traditional *******s which load and unload items without the additional actions.In addition to this, our moving team noted that this appointment included a long carry from the customer's residence to where we were able to park our vehicle for loading. ******** provided an estimated number of items that would be picked up for the appointment that was *******d on August 1st. On the day of the appointment, there were more items anticipated for our team to pickup and store Gochuico's items. Our moving and packing team onsite measures, photographs, and inventories the items onsite. The customer was charged a valid $639 ******* charge for their onboarding appointment and $203.35 for labor on August 1, 2022.
  
  The customer's ********************** plan was upgraded due to the size of the items in their inventory. During the appointment, they received multiple text messages alerting them that their items were close to exceeding the limit of the estimated unit size. The message read as follows and was sent on August 1, 2022 at 4:34pm:
  
  "Your storage plan is more than 70% full. If you are upgraded to the next plan size, your monthly storage rate will be $387.0/mo and your new onboarding ******* charge will be $639. Any additional plan size upgrades will increase your monthly storage rate and onboarding ******* charge.
  
  Speak with your team lead if you do not want to upgrade."
  
  During the appointment, the customer is able to access the customer portal to see their items being added to their inventory in real-time, and make changes to the items being picked up in order to avoid an upgrade. Per the customer's ****************** ******* charges are subject to change if storage plans are upgraded. Our terms state the following:
  
  "viii. Storage Plan Changes Changes made to your storage plan, including but not limited to increasing the size of your plan or the duration of your storage term, may result in new labor rates and fees. "
  
  With regards to the customer's statements on documents, ********************** has pre and post appointment documents and we ask all customers to compete for their appointments.The post-appointment document was sent to the customer via text message at ***** on August 1, ***************************************************************** the midst of the ********************** and ********************** process.
  
  With regards to the customer's statement on the items left behind by our team, Clutter does not include disassembly and reassembly *******s for all appointments. Our teams are not all equipped with the toolkits to provide assembly *******s, and at times this may result in a customer's items remaining assembled.
  
  All charges for ******* were valid for the work provided to the customer. However, in total, the complainant has received $287 in compensation from Clutter as a courtesy for their experience.

• Initial Complaint

  Date:11/18/2022

  Type:Delivery Issues
  Status:

  AnsweredMore info

  Complaint statuses

  Resolved:

  The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.

  Unresolved:

  The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.

  Answered:

  The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.

  Unanswered:

  The business failed to respond to the dispute.

  Unpursuable:

  BBB is unable to locate the business.

  This complaint is to resolve storage fees during the period of time that Clutter and I were negotiating a final delivery fee. Because my original contract stated that my final delivery fee was free, I had to dispute their final delivery fee of over **** which I did not agree to. During the period of our negotiations, storage fees accrued. Had they honored the contract that I had signed I would not have accrued anymore storage fees and would have scheduled my delivery at the point before a new bill was due. I am asking for storage fees to be negated during this period because of ****** being out of the office many times when I attempted to reach her...over 15 times to be exact. We have agreed upon a final delivery fee of **** and beyond that my storage fee accrual should be 0.00 because of the time that it took to resolve this matter.

  Business Response

  Date: 12/21/2022

  Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2022/12/02) */
  Clutter, Inc is a household goods moving business that provides item storage within warehouses. For a fee, Clutter packs, wraps, and moves a customer's belongings from one residence to another within one of our operative service areas. Clutter does not accept in-person returns at our warehouse facility locations as a matter of on-site safety for customers and employees. On January 12, 2020, the complainant, **** ******* hired our pickup and packing services for storage. On this date, **** agreed to our Terms of Service which state:
  
  "6. Plan Changes
  I understand that under certain circumstances my plan or price may change.
  
  a. If the items to be stored exceed the space available in my plan, Clutter reserves the right to upgrade to the correct plan size and notify me of the change.
  
  b. Clutter may add new services for additional fees and charges, or amend fees and charges for existing services, at any time in its sole discretion. Any Change to pricing
  or payment terms shall become effective in the billing cycle following notice of such change"
  
  On October 21, 2021 the customer called in to inquire about her potential final return cost. At that time, the customer was informed that per her account details, the final return would be free. Clutter reserves the right, per our Terms of Use, to change or update the cost of services or products provided by Clutter.
  
  Section E of the Terms of Use agreement, titled "Payment, Subscription Services, and Cancellation" states:
  "By using the Services, or other paid services or products provided by Clutter, you agree to our pricing and payment terms, as we may update them from time to time. Clutter may add new Services for additional fees and charges, or amend fees and charges for existing Services, at any time, in its sole discretion. Clutter may also charge certain late, rush, and cancellation fees, in its sole discretion. Upon any such changes to fees and charges, we will notify you that such changes have been made via email and/or your Clutter Account. We may, from time to time and in our sole discretion, offer certain discounts, promotional offers, or referral codes ("Promotions")in connection with our Services. You agree that Promotions are offered subject to our right to manage, regulate, control, modify, revoke, and/or eliminate the Promotions as Clutter sees fit, in its sole discretion, for any reason or no reason, in any general or specific case, and that Clutter will have no liability to you based on its exercise of such right."
  
  On May 4th, 2022, Clutter sent **** an email alerting her to the change in pricing for the final delivery of her account. Clutter gave **** a 30 day grace period to get her items returned for free before the price increase, and **** chose not to do so.
  
  On October 12, 2022 the customer contacted Clutter to dispute the Final Return charges, stating that they were too high. The customer was given a *** credit as a courtesy for this complaint. Additionally in October 2022, the customer filed a**** complaint to which Clutter responded, and reached out to the customer about. On November 3rd, Clutter offered **** **** to cover 3 hours of the labor associated with the Final Return appointment, which the customer rejected. The customer's complaint that our customer service representative's availability delayed the **** offer is false, as this resolution was offered prior to the mentioned representative's delayed availability.
  
  All storage billing is valid as Clutter continued to provide a service despite an active dispute for valid charges. All past charges are valid, and the customer accrued a delinquent balance in the amount of ******** All customers are responsible for paying a final delivery service charge in order to cancel their accounts and service with Clutter. Ms. ********* final delivery service charge is in the amount of **** with a ******** per mover labor rate, which Clutter offered a **** credit to cover the cost of labor for.
  
  As Clutter provided a storage service to the customer throughout the time that the final delivery charge and provided monetary resolution were pending acceptance, we are unable to waive the previous months of storage fees.
  
  
  Consumer Response /* (3000, 7, 2022/12/04) */
  (The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
  Clutter's response to my complaint to dissolve storage fees during negotiation of final delivery are completely unreasonable and unprofessional. After numerous unsuccessful attempts to reach ******, Clutter's fee negotiator who was rarely available the storage fees continued to mount. During the time of negotiating a final delivery fee, no further storage fees should have been assessed. I requested a FINAL delivery and from the day that this was requested no further fees should have accumulated. Is Clutter incompetent at understanding this ******** Why should I be penalized with additional fees when I only wanted a Final delivery? It is not my fault that I had to play phone tag while ****** was out on vacation etc. I ask that Clutter bring any accumulated storage fees to zero from the date that I requested a Final delivery! Anything else is just ***** *********** business *********
  
  
  Business Response /* (4000, 9, 2022/12/15) */
  Clutter, Inc is a household goods moving business that provides item storage within warehouses. For a fee, Clutter packs, wraps, and moves a customer's belongings from one residence to another within one of our operative service areas. Clutter does not accept in-person returns at our warehouse facility locations as a matter of on-site safety for customers and employees. On January 12, 2020, the complainant, **** ******, hired our pickup and packing services for storage
  
  With regards to the customer's response, upon reviewing her account, ****** attempted to make contact with the customer various times. ****** placed a phone call to the customer once on 10/19/22, again on 10/21/22 and finally on 10/25/22. The customer did not answer any of these phone calls. ****** left voicemails during every attempt to reach the customer. The customer eventually returned the third call three hours later, after ****** had gone home for the day.
  
  The customer eventually got in touch with another ************** Specialist ***** on 11/3/22 who discussed her options with her.
  
  It has been explained to the customer several times that these storage fees are completely valid as Clutter continued to provide a service, despite the ongoing dispute. The customer was also informed that just because she is negotiating a lower payment, does not allow for the waiving of agreed upon fees, nor delaying of valid charges. The customer has since accrued a delinquent balance in the amount of ******* which include late fees due to failure to pay previous amounts owed. All customers are responsible for paying a final delivery service charge in order to cancel their accounts and service with Clutter, which is something all customers are made aware of. Ms. ********* final delivery service charge is in the amount of **** with a ******** per mover labor rate, which Clutter offered a **** credit to cover the cost of labor for (and the customer rejected this offer).
  
  An active dispute or complaint does not give the customer the option to refrain from making payments. All customers are still responsible for all charges that are billed while they actively store with Clutter.
  
  As Clutter provided a storage service to the customer and the customer was billed for valid services owed, we stand by the fact that we are unable to waive the previous months of storage fees.
  
  
  Consumer Response /* (4200, 11, 2022/12/19) */
  (The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
  This is an example of a completely unethical business practice. I ask that Clutter do the RIGHT thing and at least meet me halfway on these storage fees so that we can settle my account and get my possessions delivered for a ***** delivery. Please do the RIGHT thing Clutter..************************************************
  Thank you.

• Initial Complaint

  Date:11/18/2022

  Type:Service or Repair Issues
  Status:

  AnsweredMore info

  Complaint statuses

  Resolved:

  The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.

  Unresolved:

  The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.

  Answered:

  The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.

  Unanswered:

  The business failed to respond to the dispute.

  Unpursuable:

  BBB is unable to locate the business.

  This company failed to pick up my items as requested, and sent a smaller moving truck than requested. This resulted in my having to move out of my apartment and leave behind items, incurring thousands in losses. They then proceeded to damage my furniture, and they failed to secure them (some items were lost and/or stolen) and their claims process was so convoluted that it was essentially worthless. I have yet to recoup any of the losses, and the company is insisting I work with my renter's insurance to recoup the losses.
  They offered an unacceptable resolution, and then closed the ticket (requiring me to go through a highly time-intensive process to re-open the ticket).
  This is not only a failure to deliver the services I paid for (for which I would like a full refund), but they are also attempting to ensure they do not pay for the damages they incurred.

  Business Response

  Date: 01/17/2023

  Clutter, Inc is a household goods moving business that provides item storage within warehouses. For a fee, Clutter packs, wraps, and moves a customer's belongings from one residence to another within one of our operative service areas. Clutter does not accept in-person returns at our warehouse facility locations as a matter of on-site safety for customers and employees. On March 31, 2021, the complainant, *******, hired Makespace, a storage company Clutter acquired, to provide a pickup and packing service. Clutter acquired Makespace in February 2022, and all accounts were transitioned to Clutter's services. This was communicated to all Makespace customers 1 month prior to the transition occurring.
  
  On February 8, 2022, the customer had their inventory returned to them in an appointment serviced by Makespace. The customer filed a claim for their damages with Makespace. When prompted to file a claim for damages with Clutter, the customer refused. ********************** conducted an investigation into the claim filed with Makespace and applied the information to provide an offer to the customer. *******'s account has a protection plan that covers $1/lb of loss or damages. When *******'s account was with Makespace, this was called the Basic Protection Plan and only covered $0.60/lb of loss or damages. Once Makespace was acquired, Clutter raised this protection plan to meet our default $1/lb Protection Plan. As a result, *******'s protection plan was inherently increased.
  
  When the customer contacted ********************** in August 2022, the customer was offered a claim resolution of $1208 by Clutter for all loss and damages to their items in August 2022. This amount was $992 higher than what Clutter was liable for, per the Basic Protection Plan on the customer's account ($1/lb). This offer was provided as a courtesy for their experience. The customer rejected this resolution, stating that Clutter failed to handle their items appropriately.
  
  The customer did not accept the above-policy offer and returned several months later in November. At this time, *******'s above-policy offer had expired, and upon a review, their offer had returned to the $1/lb offer that Clutter is liable for. ******* disputed our $1/lb offer stating that Makespace had offered an amount that was triple the amount Clutter offered. The customer was informed that ********************** had investigated the former Makespace claim and did not find any additional information to support the Makespace compensation offer amount.
  
  The customer was then informed that because Makespace no longer exists, and the offer is above what is contractually owed by Makespae ($0.60/lb), that Clutter's offer would not increase above our $1/lb policy. At this time, ******* is now disputing Clutter's second offer after the first above-policy offer, which was increased as a courtesy, expired due to the customer's refusal to accept it.
  

  Customer Answer

  Date: 01/30/2023

  I refused to accept an offer that did not acknowledge that I paid for services that were NEVER RENDERED. My items were NOT picked up as ordered. My order was upgraded to $100 extra cost per month, despite the claim that my items could not be picked up because the truck only had enough storage as the storage unit size I ordered.
  My items were NOT stored securely as promised (and were in fact vandalized, as a dresser drawer was broken and all personal items in that dresser were stolen, a claim that make space/ clutter still refused to acknowledge, much less offer compensation for).
  
  My items were also NOT securely delivered as ordered. The claim process was designed to be convoluted and difficult, and the company claims that a name change and change in ownership allows them to absolve themselves of liability for tens of thousands of dollars in damages. They don't need to compensate the full amount but an offer of <$1000 when they not only didn't deliver on a single service as promised, but also proceeded to act in ways that results in this much damage is not acceptable.

  Business Response

  Date: 01/30/2023

  Business Response /* (1000, 10, 2023/01/17) */
  Clutter, Inc is a household goods moving business that provides item storage within warehouses. For a fee, Clutter packs, wraps, and moves a customer's belongings from one residence to another within one of our operative service areas. Clutter does not accept in-person returns at our warehouse facility locations as a matter of on-site safety for customers and employees. On March 31, 2021, the complainant, *******, hired *********, a storage company Clutter acquired, to provide a pickup and packing service. Clutter acquired ********* in February 2022, and all accounts were transitioned to Clutter's services. This was communicated to all ********* customers 1 month prior to the transition occurring.
  
  On February 8, 2022, the customer had their inventory returned to them in an appointment serviced by *********. The customer filed a claim for their damages with *********. When prompted to file a claim for damages with Clutter, the customer refused. Clutter conducted an investigation into the claim filed with ********* and applied the information to provide an offer to the customer. ********** account has a protection plan that covers $1/lb of loss or damages. When ********** account was with *********, this was called the Basic Protection Plan and only covered $0.60/lb of loss or damages. Once ********* was acquired, Clutter raised this protection plan to meet our default $1/lb Protection Plan. As a result, ********** protection plan was inherently increased.
  
  When the customer contacted Clutter in August 2022, the customer was offered a claim resolution of $1208 by Clutter for all loss and damages to their items in August 2022. This amount was $992 higher than what Clutter was liable for, per the Basic Protection Plan on the customer's account ($1/lb). This offer was provided as a courtesy for their experience. The customer rejected this resolution, stating that Clutter failed to handle their items appropriately.
  
  The customer did not accept the above-policy offer and returned several months later in November. At this time, ********** above-policy offer had expired, and upon a review, their offer had returned to the $1/lb offer that Clutter is liable for. ******* disputed our $1/lb offer stating that ********* had offered an amount that was triple the amount Clutter offered. The customer was informed that Clutter had investigated the former ********* claim and did not find any additional information to support the ********* compensation offer amount.
  
  The customer was then informed that because ********* no longer exists, and the offer is above what is contractually owed by ******** ($0.60/lb), that Clutter's offer would not increase above our $1/lb policy. At this time, ******* is now disputing Clutter's second offer after the first above-policy offer, which was increased as a courtesy, expired due to the customer's refusal to accept it.

  Business Response

  Date: 03/10/2023

  Clutter is a full service moving and storage company. ******* hired MakeSpace to pack and store their items. Clutter acquired MakeSpace in 2022, and ********* account was transitioned to Clutter. Prior to the acquisition, ******* filed a claim with MakeSpace regarding their items. Clutter re-evaluated the claim to make an offer. ********* protection plan with MakeSpace was $0.60 per pound for lost or damaged items. As a courtesy, Clutter went above policy and offered ******* a total offer of $1,208, $992 above policy. ******* rejected this offer and we advised this is the maximum amount we can offer, as the offer was significantly above policy. 

  Customer Answer

  Date: 03/18/2023

  Complaint: 19318508
  
  I am rejecting this response because:
  The business did not acknowledge outstanding liability and did not make a legitimate offer.
  Sincerely,
  
  *********************

  Business Response

  Date: 03/20/2023

  When the customer contacted ********************** in August 2022, the customer was offered a claim resolution of $1208 by Clutter for all loss and damages to their items in August 2022. This amount was $992 higher than what Clutter was liable for, per the Basic Protection Plan on the customer's account ($1/lb). This offer was provided as a courtesy for their experience. The customer rejected this resolution, stating that Clutter failed to handle their items appropriately.
  
  The customer did not accept the above-policy offer and returned several months later in November. At this time, *******'s above-policy offer had expired, and upon a review, their offer had returned to the $1/lb offer that Clutter is liable for. ******* disputed our $1/lb offer stating that Makespace had offered an amount that was triple the amount Clutter offered. The customer was informed that ********************** had investigated the former Makespace claim and did not find any additional information to support the Makespace compensation offer amount.
  
  The customer was then informed that because Makespace no longer exists, and the offer is above what is contractually owed by Makespae ($0.60/lb), that Clutter's offer would not increase above our $1/lb policy. At this time, ******* is now disputing Clutter's second offer after the first above-policy offer, which was increased as a courtesy, expired due to the customer's refusal to accept it.

  Customer Answer

  Date: 03/24/2023

   
  Complaint: 19318508
  
  I am rejecting this response because: the business claims they made a second offer above policy. They did not - the second offer made was BELOW the first offer of $1208, which was rejected because it was not acceptable. Since Clutter did not provide the services they were paid for and, in addition to the damages incurred, they were negligent by allowing my items to be stolen and vandalized while they were "securely stored", I would like a refund of everything I paid Clutter, in addition to a settlement offer. 

  I did not receive the services I paid for (secure moving, secure storage), I was upcharged after being told the size left in the truck was the exact size of storage I ordered, and I incurred thousands of dollars in damage to furniture and thousands of dollars in losses due to theft and vandalism.

  The business continues to decline to make an offer based on the fact that they merged with another business and therefore have no liability is neither ethical nor legal.

  
  Sincerely,
  
  Burouj *******