BBB Logo

Better Business Bureau ®
Start With Trust®
San Diego, Orange and Imperial Counties

BBB Accredited Business since


BBB Business Reviews may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.


This company offers tax preparation and general tax services.

Request a Quote

Request a Quote from ZipTax

BBB Accreditation

A BBB Accredited Business since

BBB has determined that ZipTax meets BBB accreditation standards, which include a commitment to make a good faith effort to resolve any consumer complaints. BBB Accredited Businesses pay a fee for accreditation review/monitoring and for support of BBB services to the public.

BBB accreditation does not mean that the business' products or services have been evaluated or endorsed by BBB, or that BBB has made a determination as to the business' product quality or competency in performing services.

Reason for Rating

BBB rating is based on 16 factors. Get the details about the factors considered.

Factors that lowered the rating for ZipTax include:

  • Length of time business has been operating

Factors that raised the rating for ZipTax include:

  • Complaint volume filed with BBB for business of this size.
  • Response to 5 complaint(s) filed against business.
  • Resolution of complaint(s) filed against business.
  • BBB has sufficient background information on this business.

Customer Complaints Summary Read complaint details

5 complaints closed with BBB in last 3 years | 5 closed in last 12 months
Complaint Type Total Closed Complaints
Advertising/Sales Issues 1
Billing/Collection Issues 0
Delivery Issues 0
Guarantee/Warranty Issues 0
Problems with Product/Service 4
Total Closed Complaints 5

Customer Reviews Summary Read customer reviews

5 Customer Reviews on ZipTax
Customer Experience Total Customer Reviews
Positive Experience 5
Neutral Experience 0
Negative Experience 0
Total Customer Reviews 5

Additional Information

BBB file opened: Business started: 10/05/2012 in CA Business started locally: 10/05/2012 Business incorporated: 10/05/2012 in CA
Licensing, Bonding or Registration

This business is in an industry that may require professional licensing, bonding or registration. BBB encourages you to check with the appropriate agency to be certain any requirements are currently being met.

These agencies may include:

State Bar of California
845 S Figueroa St, Los Angeles CA 90017
Phone Number: (213) 765-1000
The license number is 253175.

Type of Entity

Limited Liability Company (LLC)

Business Management
Mr. Jim Dougal, President Mr. Chris Shihadeh, Vice President
Contact Information
Principal: Mr. Jim Dougal, President
Principal: Mr. Chris Shihadeh, Vice President
Number of Employees


Business Category

Taxes - Consultants & Representatives

Additional Locations

  • 2050 Main St #950

    Irvine, CA 92614

  • 220 Newport Center Dr #11-646

    Newport Beach, CA 92660


What is a BBB Business Review?

We offer free reviews on businesses that include background, licensing, consumer experience and other information such as governmental actions that is known to BBB. These reviews are provided for businesses that are BBB accredited and also for businesses that are not BBB accredited.


About BBB Business Review Content & Services:

Some Better Business Bureaus offer additional content & services in BBB Business Reviews.
The additional content & services are typically regional in nature or, in some cases, a new product or service that is being tested prior to a more general release.
Not all enhanced content & services are available at all Better Business Bureaus.

Professional AffiliationsX

Types of Complaints Handled by BBB

BBB handles the following types of complaints between businesses and their customers so long as they are not, or have not been, litigated:

  • Advertising or Sales
  • Billing or Collection
  • Problems with Products or Services
  • Delivery
  • Guarantee or Warranty

We do not handle workplace disputes, discrimination claims or claims about the quality of health or legal services.


BBB Complaint Process

Your complaint will be forwarded to the business within two business days. The business will be asked to respond within 14 days, and if a response is not received, a second request will be made. You will be notified of the business's response when we receive it (or notified that we received no response). Complaints are usually closed within 30 business days.


What is BBB Advertising Review?

BBB promotes truth in advertising by contacting advertisers whose claims conflict with the BBB Code of Advertising. These claims come to our attention from our internal review of advertising, consumer complaints and competitor challenges. BBB asks advertisers to prove their claims, change ads to make offers more clear to consumers, and remove misleading or deceptive statements.


What government actions does BBB report on?

BBB reports on known significant government actions involving business' marketplace conduct.


Thank you for your feedback!

Help us improve by taking our survey.


BBB Reporting Policy

As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business.

BBB Business Reviews are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. Information in this BBB Business Review is believed reliable but not guaranteed as to accuracy.

BBB Business Reviews generally cover a three-year reporting period. BBB Business Reviews are subject to change at any time.


Additional Email Addresses

  • - Communication/Mass Email
Find a LocationX

  Change Location
Show Only Accredited Locations

Complaint Detail(s)

11/24/2014 Problems with Product/Service | Complaint Details Unavailable
11/12/2014 Problems with Product/Service | Read Complaint Details

Additional Notes

Complaint: My name is ******* ******. I received a notice in the mail stating that I would be audited by the IRS and to call them and schedule a time. I contacted the IRS and was informed that the date of my audit would be September 24, 2014 at 12:00 pm. I heard a radio advertisement about Ziptax and contacted this company on August 15, 2014 regarding representing me during this audit. Zip Tax said they would be able to represent me. After speaking with them, I learned that they are located in California. When I presented this concern to Zip Tax, they said they have representatives throughout various states and still would be able to represent me in Georgia on my audit date. Zip Tax also informed me that they would attend my audit meeting on September 24, 2014 and I would not have to attend. Zip Tax said they would complete the audit process for me from beginning to the end and would work with the IRS to get me a fair settlement in the event I had to pay monies to them. Zip Tax began sending me paperwork on August 15, 2014 to be signed. August 29, 2014 I received the Zip Tax agreement/contract detailing that they would represent me during this tax audit. September 4, 2014, Zip Tax began requesting that I send information to them that was requested by the audit. September 8, 2014, I received a Welcome to Zip Tax email giving an overview of the process and requested documents that needed to be completed. On September 18, 2014, Zip Tax requested additional documents from me regarding the audit. I sent in all the documents they requested within the timeframe they said the documents needed to be received by. I paid Zip Tax a $500.00 deposit for them to review my case and determine if they would be able to assist me with my audit. They called me back and said they would, but it would cost an additional $1,000.00 . After working out a payment plan with Zip Tax, they agreed to take my case. On October 2, 2014, I called Zip Tax to receive an update on my case because at this point, I had not heard anything from them. I was informed that they needed $1,500 more dollars to do an amendment of taxes. I informed them that I wanted to wait until next week before I make a decision. On October 7, 2014 I called the IRS and was informed that Zip Tax did not represent me on my audit date (they did not show up or send my representation), nor have they returned any of their (IRS) calls. The tax auditor said Zip Tax was requesting to complete the audit via correspondence and she explained to them that because I lived in the state of Georgia, someone would have to attend the audit in person. The IRS agent said Zip Tax informed her that they would contact me and try to reschedule the audit date. I never received this correspondence/phone call requesting a change in the audit date and was not informed that the audit had been missed. After speaking with the IRS, I called Zip Tax and spoke with **** ******, who said she was the manager and there was no one else I could speak with. Mr. ****** said I had not retained them to represent me for my tax audit and I had not been their client for a few weeks at this point (despite the contract/agreement signed). Mr. ****** also said I would have to pay at least $6,000.00 for them to represent me during the audit and told me I needed to read my contract with them. After reviewing the contract (which I did initially, but reviewed it after our conversation). Mr. ****** also informed me that I would not receive a refund because they took time to complete “work done” on my case. When I requested the “work done” on my case, Mr. ****** said he would send me a summary detailing what they did and the time spend preparing the paperwork. He said because they have not been my representation for a couple of weeks now. I told him I was not informed of this and just last week, they requested additional monies from me. I asked Mr. ****** if the phone calls were recorded with his company, he said they are recorded. I requested him to go back and listen to the recorded phone calls between myself and the company. I also informed Mr. ****** I wanted to speak with the attorney I had hired. He said they were busy and could not speak with me, but he would call me back by the end of the day with a 10 minute session that would be convenient for their schedule. I agreed to this. Mr. ****** did not call me back at all on this day (October 7, 2014). Initially, Zip Tax agreed to represent me from beginning to end for my tax audit. Then after the audit date, they completely resented their decision to represent me, requested additional monies and failed to inform me that they missed my tax audit date. This is completely unethical. I am requesting that an investigation be completed on this company for false advertisement and a breach of contract. I have enclosed the documents and email correspondence exchanged between myself and Zip Tax for your convenience. I implore you to please look into this matter, so no one else is a victim of this company’s fraudulent practices.

Desired Settlement: I would like for Zip Tax to honor their written contract or advise customers that they are not able to assist with the matter. For my personal case, I would like a refund since failed to represent me (as outlined in my contract) or assist with my tax matters. I believe this business has a responsibility to conduct business on an ethical basis, upholding their end of the agreement that they present to customers.

Business Response: I have been speaking at great lengths with Ms ****** via phone and email in getting this issue resolved, and while I had anticipated we would come to a conclusion prior to the response deadline, I have not been able to reach her for the last several days so i will update you with our progress so far.

As the BBB knows, we utilize a 2 phase process that ensures we have accurate information directly from the IRS prior to having clients retain us for resolution work (phase 2). After completing the first phase of our process, it was determined that Ms ****** needed representation in her upcoming audit. This is the only service we bill hourly at $299/hr, as audits can differ greatly in the amount of time it takes to review and complete. 

We offered an initial package to start her audit, which was 6 hours for $1000. Our lead attorney who handles our audit cases bills a timesheet for work completed, and when the billable hours nears completion, we inform the client where we stand, and if they wish to proceed with further representation, are required to purchase additional hours at that time. Although 6 hours of work was completed, Ms ****** felt the case should have been further along that it was at the time.

At this point she filed complaints, which is when I stepped in to resolve, as i had no idea there was even a problem. I followed up with her immediately after I received the complaint on 10/11

Ms ****** had an issue with an audit appointment that had passed without her knowledge. We accepted responsibility as this was a miscommunication error on our part, and after speaking with her, I explained that we could reset the hearing without a problem.  I offered to reset the hearing and provide her with a full package she would need to defend herself at the audit at no cost to her. This would take approximately 10 additional hours, or roughly $3000. She said she would think about and call me first thing Monday morning. 

I had not heard from her so I called her back Tuesday afternoon, She was busy and requested a call back.. After I reached her (Wednesday or Thursday), she explained that while she appreciated the offer, she did not want us to handle the audit work at this point. I explained that i wanted to come to a resolution and make her feel like she received satisfactory service. 

I had offered to give her refund of $750, which although we completed the billable hours, I felt was reasonable to give Mr ****** the piece of mind in understanding ZipTax is here to do the right thing. We were in agreement and she was going to call me Monday 10/27 to get everything completed. I have sent her an email and left her a voicemail this week and have yet to hear back.

We have had several good conversations, and I am certain we will come to an amicable result. I certainly wish their was a process with the BBB that could inform me of a potential complaint prior to being posted all over the internet. 

Best Regards 
- ***** ********

Consumer Response: Better Business Bureau:

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID ********, and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint.  For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.

This company has inconvenienced me enormously and this refund does not suffice the hardships and troubles I am dealing as a result of their negligence and lack of professionalism. I feel that since I paid $1,500, a refund of at least $1,000.00 will be fair. 

I had to call my IRS agent and rescheduled an appointment for this audit. Zip Tax informed me that they do not have paperwork I need in response to the preparation (which is what I was told I was originally paying for). I am wiling for forfeit $500.00 because I was told that some time was spent on my case (although there is no proof of this). So at this time, I cannot accept a $750.00 refund against Zip Tax.  


******* ******

Business Response: I have reviewed Ms ******'s response and was shocked to see she went against our verbal agreement of a $750 refund that was already one-sided to her benefit. I have attached her activity report of work completed and it clearly shows all the uploaded documents our attorney reviewed and the corresponding memo that the attorney sent to Ms ****** to assist in her audit defense. We explained to Ms ****** that her billable hours had been fulfilled and if she would like to retain us for more hours, we would spend more time with the audit defense. She declined retaining us for additional hours, and instead claimed the hours she paid for should have covered the whole audit.  That is clearly not how hourly audit defense works. Ms ****** has not been inconvenienced at all, she was able to reschedule her audit hearing in one phone call, which we offered to do but she insisted that we do not. Additionally, she now has an exact blueprint of what her Auditor wants, as detailed in the activity report, which she has acknowledged was received. 

We completed the work and I have made numerous efforts to go over and above in resolving her complaint; she continues to ask for more refunds and at this point we are only wiling to refund our original offer amount of $500. 

Consumer Response: Better Business Bureau:

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID ********, and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint.  For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.

On August 29, 2014, I signed an agreement/contract with ZipTax. Section 2-Scope of Services clearly states: Client retains company to provide tax services which may consist of: a.) Prepare/Amend and file tax returns, b.) Representation with the Internal Revenue (Audit), c.) Negotiations and Preparations of available tax relief programs, d.) Tax planning and consulting for previous or future tax years, and e.) Any other tax-related matters contracted herein. I am attaching a copy of the contract for your review. 

My initial audit with the Internal Revenue was scheduled for 9/24/2014. According to the timeline provided by Chris Shihadeh with Zip Tax, no calls or attempts were made to contact the Internal Revenue regarding my audit on the date of my audit. I called and inquired about the status of the audit on 9/25/2014 and was informed someone would follow up with me. I was not informed at this time that Zip Tax did not represent me for my tax audit, nor did they contact the Internal Revenue to inform them that they would not be able to attend/reschedule the audit. 
I called the IRS on 10/11/2014, at which time I was informed by the Internal Revenue agent (Ms. Wang) that Zip Tax did not represent me on the date of my audit and the last time she spoke with them was on 9/16/2014 requesting a correspondence audit. Ms. Wang said she informed Zip Tax that representation for the audit would have to occur in person. The tax audit was scheduled for 9/24/2014, and Ms. Wang said she had not heard from them since 9/16/2014. 
I called Zip Tax on 9/25/2014, at which time, I was not informed that they had missed the audit, instead, they said they would give me an update. When I called Zip Tax on 10/2/2014 and 10/8/2014, Zip Tax only requested additional money, but still had not informed me that they missed my audit date. 
According to Zip Tax's time sheet, 2.9 hours were spent reviewing and summarizing information document request and related documents in preparation for drafting outline and memo to client. The outline they emailed me to request documentation was almost verbatim to the Internal Revenue document of requested information (which I attached for your review). I find it difficult to understand why it took 2.9 hours to draft this document since it is verbatim to the IRS letter. 
It was unethical/unprofessional on Zip Tax's behalf to deceive me like they were working on preparing for my tax audit when that was not the case. Zip Tax requested that I send them documents requested by the Internal Revenue, they failed to organize/assemble a packet for the audit, instead Zip Tax said they are not responsible for organizing the documents. This is contradictory to their request for the documents. My contract clearly states that they would represent me for this tax audit ( Please note Section 2).
Due to their lack of professionalism and unethical practices, I had to reschedule  the audit myself (after the original audit date) to avoid additional fees, penalties, and possible jail time. This has inconvenienced me because I have paid for services I did not receive and I am now responsible for preparing a packet to represent myself during the audit.  I have attached a copy of the original date of the IRS audit date, which I also provided to Zip Tax. I am also attaching a copy of the outline of requested documents requested by the IRS for the audit. Therefore, I am requesting a $1,000.00 refund because they did not uphold their end of the contract.


******* ******

11/6/2014 Problems with Product/Service | Read Complaint Details

Additional Notes

Complaint: I called Ziptax after hearing a Radio Ad. I told the salesperson what my problem was. I was congratulated and said I was approved for there help. It was going to cost me $995.00. Which I did not really have given my current tax problem. I was able to come up with it and paid them. Ok I thinking my tax problems may start to be part of the past. NO not it at all. A few days later I was called again telling me congratulations again. I have been accepted, once again. But this time it was going to cost me $15,000. I don't have anywhere near that kind of money. I told them this. There advise was to sell stuff, borrow, whatever I could do to get it. First of all I think I was lied to about the first $995.00. I would like my money back and I will sign what ever they want to keep me quite.

Desired Settlement: I want my $995.00 back that I didn't have in the first place.

Business Response:

Please allow me to explain how our process works. At Ziptax, LLC we utilize a 2-phase process that ensures we have accurate information directly from the Tax Agencies (IRS/State) prior to having clients retain us for tax negotiation work (phase 2).  I like to use the analogy of an auto mechanic as it is very similar. When folks take their car to an auto mechanic because something is wrong, they have to get a diagnostic first. If the mechanic said “we need to replace the engine” before they even opened the hood, every person would respond “how do you know this if you don’t even know what the problem is.” We are essentially “going under the hood” to complete the diagnostic of their tax problem, so we can do a better job on the clients behalf and not speculate.


Mr. ****** contracted with ZipTax, LLC for the Phase 1 of our process (see the Investigative Agreement), which also includes a Do-It-Yourself Kit if the client decides not to proceed with our tax negotiation services (Phase 2). Mr ****** had an expected liability over $100,000, so our Phase 1 investigation fee $995.


At ZipTax we have several layers of compliance to ensure our clients fully understand our process on EVERY case. First, our intake department relays the process of Phase 1 and Phase 2, being closely monitored by a sales manager to make sure it is being explained properly.  The intake representative reviews the process and terms thoroughly with the prospective client.


Then, after verbal agreement from the client, the case goes to Document Prep to prepare and review the necessary documentation, including powers of attorney and service agreements. On all Phase 1 cases, our Document Prep department reviews the phase 1 agreement very clearly, making sure every client understands the payment terms/fee.  At this point, the Document Prep representative reiterates once again how this stage is strictly an investigation (diagnostic) into their tax liabilities.  Additionally The client is explained again here that after Phase 1 is complete, we contact them with a comprehensive plan of action along with the additional proposal to fully resolve the liability, after we know what the true problem is.  Mr. ****** agreed, now for the 2nd time with 2 separate representatives, that he understood and wished to proceed.


As such, Mr. ****** reviewed the agreement and terms with the rep and then executed the Agreement.  The case was then submitted for approval.  At this stage, before any payment was drafted, a representative from our Customer Service team conducted a Welcome Call to Mr. ****** within 24 hrs.  Now, a 3rd representative from our office reviewed the entire terms and process, for which ****** agreed again to proceed. 


From here, we then drafted client’s payment and the case was queued to our Negotiations team to begin our Phase 1 service. 

On 10/15/14, one of our Tax Attorneys, K. *******, contacted the IRS to inform them of our representation.  She also obtained detailed transcripts from the IRS of the clients’ situation. We found out the client’s liability was $251,929 with 2 tax years unfiled.


At this stage, our Senior Tax Attorney, J.******, along with Case Manager, S. *******, met to review the case details.  They came up with a Plan of Action on how we can best proceed with our Phase 2 resolution services.  It was determined that based on our client’s financial status we would be able to achieve an extremely favorable Offer In Compromise with a substantial reduction in total liability. This is the coveted tax relief program that all default taxpayers want to qualify for, and Mr ****** was a great candidate. However, this program is very complex and time consuming. Our legal staff determined that for a case of this complexity, the total retainer fee would be $15,000.


Our office then contacted Mr. ****** to provide an update and offer our proposed Plan of Action, for which he would need to retain us for the Phase 2 resolution services.  At this point, ****** said he wanted to move forward but needed to review funds with his family. A few days later, he contacted us to inform us he would be unable to come up with funds for the Phase 2 retainer.  We attempted to work with him and offered to extend him credit with our office with very reasonable payment terms.  He rejected the offer to proceed with Phase 2.    As such, the Do-it-yourself Kit was sent to Mr. ****** which concluded our services and representation.


Not once at this stage or anytime before, did he state he was unhappy with our office, any representative, or our process.  He never mentioned he was confused or did not understand how the two phases work.


While I certainly wish Mr ****** was able to retain us and see how successful we could have been, I understand his financial decision as well. At this time, ZipTax has fulfilled its obligation and I am deeply disappointed that Mr ****** feels compelled to say he did not understand the two phases, when he made absolutely no inclination of misunderstanding at any point.   We had 3 levels of “quality control” to ensure he understood before any payment was drafted.  Only after which, we proceed to provide legal representation.  We completed our services and provided the Kit, as agreed to in the executed contract.  

3/6/2014 Advertising/Sales Issues | Read Complaint Details

Additional Notes

Complaint: I contacted Zip Tax from a radio advertisement, I was sold by a used car salesman type who promised me irs immunity during the process, and assured me that if I used their services I would still receive my 2013 tax returns and I could use these to pay for my services with ZipTax. I mentioned to him that my income would be increasing and that i would have sufficient tax returns in 2013 and 2014 to cover my liability, however he promised me that by using the ziptax services I would be able to keep one of those tax returns. I signed up with their service solely on this promise. As I began my process, I was told I would need to file 2013 prior to them beginning their offer in compromise on my behalf. This was conflicting with the information I was provided prior to agreeing to sign up with this firm. Once I became aware of this situation I questioned the promises made and began getting the run around. The sales man that I originally talked to, who told me he had been there for years and would be there through my process, all of a sudden was not an employee any longer. So it became my word against theirs. I was then informed that not only would I for fit my 2013 tax returns, but I also would be forfiting my 2014 tax returns as well. I found this very disturbing and requested to cancel my services due to misrepresentation and a misleading sales team. I feel they sold me a bill of goods they could not deliver on. A classic bait and switch. I requested a refund of my money and they counter offered with a 50% refund and sign a release of not holding them liable. I was mislead and know i needed to pay $450 because of it. I asked to speak with a manger, which took almost 1 month. Once speaking with a manager i was told there would be nothing else he could do. I feel consumers need to know about these malicious practices. I currently am out $900 dollars because i was sold a lie and the company would not stand by the word of their employees. I want my full refund of $900.

Desired Settlement: I would like a full refund of $900. I would be willing to sign a release at this point for a full refund of my $900. I should not have to pay for services that were misrepresented.

Business Response:

Mr. * states matters that are simply untrue. ZipTax has a very stringent hiring process and our employees are held to an extremely high standard of integrity. We have never employed any “used car salesman” as he describes, nor have we advised him that he would get a refund check while he is a default taxpayer to the IRS.  In our agreement, signed on 11/6/2013, Mr. * retained our services for representation with the IRS for a total of retainer of $2,700. At ZipTax, we always make it clear, both verbally and in contract, there is no guarantee as to the outcome of each case. Mr. * claims that promises were made that he would receive a check from the IRS, while he in fact OWES the IRS, is just incorrect. After we had already completed the first Phase of IRS work, Mr. * said he would like to cancel service as he thought he was mislead. He stated that we should “roll out the red carpet for him” and simply do whatever he says. In a heavily regulated industry with significant licenses at stake, we have strict protocol and cannot make up our own rules as client wishes.  While speaking with our customer service manager, we offered to VOID his last FOUR payments, which would put his total retainer to $900. At this point, we had already done enough work to justify the $900, but we believe in truly helping our clients and felt this was the right thing to do. Mr. * initially turned down this offer and then began going back and forth on whether this would be acceptable to him. Finally, he came to the conclusion that he wanted the full $900 refunded and after reviewing his case, it was determined that we did over $1000 in billable work. Despite work completed, we decided to then offer him a 50% refund of $450 because we believe in maintaining a positive reputation and stand by our work. Mr. * proceeded with verbal threats that he would stop at nothing to slander our company’s reputation that we have spent years to build. Despite our many efforts to appease Mr. K, he declined any reasonable solution. We did abide by our contract and stand by the efforts of ZipTax.

Consumer Response: Better Business Bureau:

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID *******, and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint.  For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.

Dear Better Business Bureau, first of all my name is ***** ********** . I never have gone by Mr. * or any other nickname or abbreviation. I find this completely disrespectful and unprofessional.  If the person referred to as Mr. * is ***** **********, then I would like to call attention to the lack of courtesy or respect from the ZipTax Online LLC administration. i Asked for an email giving me my options and as you will see from this email i have copied and pasted to this response, the options given to me in the email are contradicting to what options they informed of in the response to the BBB, and they are different from what options ZIPTAX told me I had prior to me contacting the BBB. I have never made any complaints to BBB. this is my first time utilizing this system. I am a licensed real estate professional who is also held to a high standard and am in an extremely regulated industry as well. The following is the email I received from ZipTax. 

 Please see the email below of the offers I was given.
********* ******* *************************
Jan 15 (10 days ago)
to me
  These are the options that we have for you available:
1.) Sign a release form and get a refund of  450 with no further work from ZipTax
2.) No refund, and we set you up on an Installment agreement with IRS and then that will be satisfying your balance paid to us (this will also require a release form)
3.) Continue your case with us on the payment plan established and we get full resolution for you.  Full resolution could be an offer in compromise, a penalty abatement, or currently not collectible.  This will be strictly based off the financials you provide us.
Please let me know how you want to proceed.  Thank you.

********* *******
As you see from this email, I did not find any of these offers acceptable. In the response you recieved from Zip tax it claimed they offered me the following and I quote...." While speaking with our customer service manager, we offered to VOID his last FOUR payments, which would put his total retainer to $900." is not listed in my available options. this is just another example of this company misrepresenting what they said and revising their statements to fit the situation. This is the exact cause of my issue with this company. I do not find their offer acceptable and I would not be comfortable working with a company that has raised this many RED FLAGS in the early process of dealing with them. I am the consumer and I am paying this company to help me. This has not been the case and I want to conclude my dealings with ZIPTAX Online and get a full refund. 

I informed ***** , the salesman, who is not working with the company any more.... that i would make more than enough in my tax return refunds to cover the debt over the next two years. His main selling point was that I would be sheltered under their program and that I would reach a resolution with out putting my tax returns at risk. This is the main reason I signed up with this organization. Once i was signed up, I was told i would loose both 2013 and 2014 tax returns to the IRS and this is where my problem originated. I have wasted a long time with this already and wish to move on to a more reputable company that discloses all information good or bad. 

Thank You, 
***** **********

Business Response:

The BBB has required that we remove names that could represent such individual, so out of respect for his wishes to not be abbreviated, he will now be referred to as "client." In Option 2 presented to client, it stated ‘No refund, and we set you up on an Installment Agreement with IRS, satisfying your balance paid to us.’  This includes VOIDING his remaining four payments to us as courtesy to client, although he legally owes the retainer balance in fault, as stated in our Client Service Agreement. Any alleged ‘misrepresentation’ that client states is simply a matter of his own misunderstanding.   

Typically, the services described in option 2 would run $1,500, so we had attempted to give client benefit of the doubt on the notion that he “felt misrepresented” and give him discounted service.   ZipTax, nor its employees misrepresented any statements.  The case manager spoke with client and explained the entire process of how IRS resolution works.  At no time did she say client was not a good candidate for the Offer in Compromise; we have told him he is an excellent candidate for this program.  However, client stated he wanted a refund from the IRS.  The case manager explained that he would not get a refund because he OWES the IRS, and they do not give money to people that owe them.  This is not a “decision” made by ZipTax to decline client his tax refund, it is just part of the IRS rules. Client even thanked the case manager for her honesty and told her that he needed a couple days because he was thinking about continuing in the settlement route (Offer In Compromise).  Case Manager then sent him a list of options as previously stated. 

ZipTax resolves tax debt and puts clients in a better situation than when they first retain us.  Client was not interested in resolving his past due tax debt, he just feels he is entitled to tax refunds before resolving previous debts. We do not lie to our clients even if the truth is not what they want to hear. We have fully abided by our contract and have gone over and above in trying to appease this client.

Consumer Response: Better Business Bureau:

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID *******, and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint.  For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.


***** **********

In reference to the response by zip tax on 1/24/14 that stated: 

"While speaking with our customer service manager, we offered to VOID his last FOUR payments, which would put his total retainer to $900. At this point, we had already done enough work to justify the $900, but we believe in truly helping our clients and felt this was the right thing to do."

Here again is another example of what ziptax has done to me.... in the intial response they state that they offered me to reduce my retainer to $900 .... and move forward. This is a great resolution and I would have accepted it.  but in the options they gave me it was reducing my retainer to $900 for a whole different program than what i signed up for. I am willing to move forward with the offer in compromise for $900....I am not willing to take a discount in services. I contacted you for the offer in compromise. I have already been into my local IRS office and have all the information i need to get into an installment plan. I would not need ZIPTAX services for this.  

I would have accepted this offer.  if this offer had been presented to me. 
However, in the options I was presented, this also included a reduction of services. I am not ok with a reduction of services. I was sold one thing and given another. My outrage is because i was mislead from the start and now given an option which doesnt allow me to be removed from this situation without damages, or with out having to pay for services i do not need . I signed up for an offer in compromise , i was told I would be able to file my taxes under their protective blanket and use my current tax returns to pay for the program. This was not the case. After signing up and speaking with a representative from ZIPTAX, i was told i would be loosing not only this years tax return, but also the following years tax return as well. This is what caused my outrage. 

I am what i would consider an educated person, Having done my background research and having a solid understanding of the tax laws, i knew enough to know i needed help. I reached out to ZIP TAX for that help. I was misinformed and mislead , once i was under contract, i was transferred to a different representative and that is when i found out i was sold false hope. I do understand i need to pay my tax debt, why else would i contact zip tax? 

I dont appreciate the condescending attitude of the responses. I do not expect anything more or less than what i was promised at the point of sale. If this can not be done I would like to continue with my offer in compromise through zip tax at the $900 option. 

But just so I am clear.... Please give me my options again.... so i can clearly understand them.  

I thanked the case manager because it was not her fault this situation occurred. It was just her job to have to deal with the aftermath.  

I would like to either continue with the offer in compromise at the outlined $900 with the last 4 payments waived or I would like a full refund. 

In my understanding, if you waive the last 4 payments that brings us to the $2500 which is the cost for the offer in compromise. I do not understand how you could waive my last four payments and place me into a different program.  This would not be considered waiving the last 4 payments. It would be considered changing my program and waiving 2 payments and giving me a service i do not need. 

Please clarify this if I am incorrect? Or if I misunderstood something.......

Business Response:  We understand dealing with a tax problem is a very serious issue and ZipTax holds itself and our employees to the highest standard of integrity. That said, ***** has unjustly stated that he was misrepresented by a used car salesman. First, we have no used car salesman, or ex-used car salesman that have ever worked here. Secondly, it clearly states in our contract everything that we do. In addition, everything is reiterated for a third time by our customer service representatives to ensure our clients have a a realistic expectation of how their case will progress.  So for ***** to say he was misrepresented is simply untrue and given the present situation, appears to be a means to get free service. He was going back and forth deciding if he wanted to proceed, and then asked for a full refund after we had already begun a significant amount of work. Despite doing over $900 of billable work, we had decided to offer ***** a partial refund (among other options) because we understand the importance of keeping a good reputation with various agencies. ***** proceeded with an ultimatum saying if we do not pay him $900, he will attempt to ruin our company. After receiving his verbal threats, we still were willing to put this aside if we could agree to his partial refund. Instead he decided to "copy and paste" the same issue outlining what he perceived to be misrepresentation on various websites to tarnish our good name. 

***** states that he was told he can file his taxes under the protective blanket of ZipTax, and this is absolutely correct! This, however, does not mean he will get refunds from the IRS. This is common knowledge among most of our clients and typically our representatives do not go into detail discussing the fact that when you owe money to the IRS, you shouldn't expect to receive check from them until your balance is satisfied. Unlke *****, most of our clients have absolutely no understanding of tax laws, and fully realize this fact.  The protective blanket' he is referring to is what we instate to prevent collection activities such as wage garnishments, bank levies, asset seizures, etc. 
In response to his questions regarding the options we offered, unfortunately he misunderstood. The options we made available back in January were:
1) 50% refund ($450) - no further work
2) Void remaining payments, set up installment agreement
3) continue established payplan and have ZipTax complete a full resolution. 
At no point did we say we were going to void all payments and do an Offer In Compromise for $900. This was made clear throughout the process.  Furthermore, we cannot in good conscience offer a refund at this point given he has caused irreparable damage to our reputation by smearing untrue comments all over the internet. 

12/13/2013 Problems with Product/Service