If yes, click here to login.
BBB Accredited Business since
Phone: (724) 929-8000 Fax: (724) 929-4040 View Additional Phone Numbers PO Box 748, Belle Vernon, PA 15012
BBB Business Reviews may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.
This company offers New/Used Auto Sls/Svc/Bdy Shp/Prts.
Request a Quote
A BBB Accredited Business since
BBB has determined that C Harper Autoplex meets BBB accreditation standards, which include a commitment to make a good faith effort to resolve any consumer complaints. BBB Accredited Businesses pay a fee for accreditation review/monitoring and for support of BBB services to the public.
BBB accreditation does not mean that the business' products or services have been evaluated or endorsed by BBB, or that BBB has made a determination as to the business' product quality or competency in performing services.
Reason for Rating
BBB rating is based on 13 factors. Get the details about the factors considered.
Factors that raised the rating for C Harper Autoplex include:
- Length of time business has been operating
- Complaint volume filed with BBB for business of this size
- Response to 2 complaint(s) filed against business
- Resolution of complaint(s) filed against business
Customer Complaints Summary Read complaint details
|Complaint Type||Total Closed Complaints|
|Problems with Product/Service||2|
|Total Closed Complaints||2|
Customer Reviews Summary Read customer reviews
|Customer Experience||Total Customer Reviews|
|Total Customer Reviews||0|
Licensing, Bonding or Registration
This business is in an industry that may require professional licensing, bonding or registration. BBB encourages you to check with the appropriate agency to be certain any requirements are currently being met.
These agencies may include:
Pennsylvania Department of State
206 North Office Building, Harrisburg PA 17120-0029
Phone Number: 717-787-8503
The number is MV014762L.
Business ManagementMr. Casey Harper, President Mr. James Waters, Controller Mr. Bill Wiel, Service Director
AUTO DEALERS - NEW CARS AUTO DEALERS - USED CARS TIRE DEALERS ALTERNATORS & GENERATORS-AUTO REPAIR AUTO BODY REPAIR & PAINTING AUTO DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE AUTO ELECTRIC SERVICE AUTO INSPECTION STATIONS AUTO REPAIR & SERVICE BRAKE SERVICE AUTO OIL CHANGE & LUBRICATION SERVICE MUFFLERS & EXHAUST SYSTEMS RADIATORS - AUTO TRANSMISSIONS - AUTO AUTO REPAIR - WINDSHIELD, GLASS SHOPS
Alternate Business NamesHarper, C Autoplex
PO Box 748
Belle Vernon, PA 15012 (800) 400-8130 (724) 929-8000
What is a BBB Business Review?
We offer free reviews on businesses that include background, licensing, consumer experience and other information such as governmental actions that is known to BBB. These reviews are provided for businesses that are BBB accredited and also for businesses that are not BBB accredited.
About BBB Business Review Content & Services:
Some Better Business Bureaus offer additional content & services in BBB Business Reviews.
The additional content & services are typically regional in nature or, in some cases, a new product or service that is being tested prior to a more general release.
Not all enhanced content & services are available at all Better Business Bureaus.
Types of Complaints Handled by BBB
BBB handles the following types of complaints between businesses and their customers so long as they are not, or have not been, litigated:
- Advertising or Sales
- Billing or Collection
- Problems with Products or Services
- Guarantee or Warranty
We do not handle workplace disputes, discrimination claims or claims about the quality of health or legal services.
BBB Complaint Process
Your complaint will be forwarded to the business within two business days. The business will be asked to respond within 14 days, and if a response is not received, a second request will be made. You will be notified of the business's response when we receive it (or notified that we received no response). Complaints are usually closed within 30 business days.
What is BBB Advertising Review?
BBB promotes truth in advertising by contacting advertisers whose claims conflict with the BBB Code of Advertising. These claims come to our attention from our internal review of advertising, consumer complaints and competitor challenges. BBB asks advertisers to prove their claims, change ads to make offers more clear to consumers, and remove misleading or deceptive statements.
What government actions does BBB report on?
BBB reports on known government actions that are relevant to the business's marketplace dealings with the public.
BBB Reporting Policy
As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business.
BBB Business Reviews are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. Information in this BBB Business Review is believed reliable but not guaranteed as to accuracy.
BBB Business Reviews generally cover a three-year reporting period. BBB Business Reviews are subject to change at any time.
Additional Phone Numbers
- (800) 400-8130(Phone)
Complaint Trends - Last 3 Years
Customer Review Trends
BBB Customer Review Rating plus BBB Rating Overview
BBB Customer Reviews Rating represents the customers opinions of the business. The Customer Review Rating is based on the number of positive, neutral and negative customer reviews posted that are calculated to produce a score.
|Customer Review Experience||Value|
|Positive Review||5 points per review|
|Neutral Review||3 points per review|
|Negative Review||1 point per review|
BBB letter grades represent the BBB's opinion of the business. The BBB grade is based on BBB file information about the business. In some cases, a business' grade may be lowered if the BBB does not have sufficient information about the business despite BBB requests for that information from the business.
BBB Letter Grade Scale
Star Rating scale
BBB Customer Review Rating plus BBB Rating is not a guarantee of a business' reliability or performance, and BBB recommends that consumers consider a business' BBB Rating and Customer Review Rating in addition to all other available information about the business. If the BBB Rating is NR then only Customer Reviews are used for the Star Rating.
Problems with Product/Service
Read Complaint Details
Complaint: C. Harper engaged a third-party repair shop ******* ************** to repair a transmission problem with our 2011 Cadillac SRX in December of 2014. This was done because C. Harper stated that had recently lost their transmission technician. Upon returning the vehicle to our possession after approximately 7 weeks we noted new cosmetic damage to the interior of the car and abnormally loud banging noises coming from the underside and front of the car that did not exist when the car was left with C. Harper for repair. We returned the vehicle to C. Harper (in what was the first of three trips back) and they repaired the interior cosmetic damage and stated that the banging noises coming from the underside/front were due to the brake lines not properly being re-installed by ****** ************* They also tightened the sway bar links alleging to us that *****s did not put the car back together properly. Upon returning the vehicle to us (for the second time) the noises coming from the underside and front of the vehicle were much quieter, but remained. We returned the vehicle to C, Harper (in what was the second of three trips back) and they found that a heat shield was bent and they fixed it. Upon receiving the car back from C. Harper (now for the second time), we noted that they did quiet the noise coming from the underside (which presumably was the heat shield), but did not fix the noises coming from the front of the car. We returned the vehicle to C. Harper (in what was the third and final trip back for the same problem) and they stated that they "thought" it was the struts making the front end noise. After that diagnosis they quoted us a repair cost of approximately $1,500 to replace the struts and refused to repair the problem which we "inherited" from the work of their third-party repair shop, ****** *************. After C. Harper's refusal to repair the damage to our vehicle while in their possession and our refusal to accept their diagnosis and associated $1,500 repair cost, we picked up our car and expressed our dissatisfaction in their refusal to repair the car in writing via their standard comment card. To date, C. Harper has not reached out to us in response to our written expression of dissatisfaction even though they state repeatedly, both in person and in their paperwork, that their customer's "satisfaction is our #1 concern at C. Harper Auto Group." In order to repair the damage caused to our vehicle while in C. Harper's possession, we took the car to a reputable local mechanic. He was able to diagnose the cause of the front end noise and it was, in fact, the brakes. It was determined that the anti-rattle clips holding the front brake pads were damaged, presumably by ****** *************. This damage allowed the brake pads to move up and down and "rattle" when the car would go over abrupt bumps. It was also determined that all of the suspension components, including the sway bar links and struts (which C. Harper proposed to replace), were fine. Had we accepted C. Harper's proposed resolution to pay approximately $1,500 to replace the struts, we would have still had the problem which, at the end of the day, cost us less than $100 to repair. This complaint with the Better Business Bureau is not being filed because of money. Clearly, we have had to expend our own money to repair a problem that was caused by C. Harper (or more specifically their third-party repair shop). .This complaint is being filed because of C. Harper actions as they relate to failing to properly diagnose the damage caused by their third-party repair shop, failing to repair the damage caused while the vehicle was in their possession, and their subsequent attempt to charge us $1,500 for unneeded repairs. Lastly, they failed to honor their claim to make customer satisfaction their number one concern by not following up in any way after we sent in the comment card with our expression of dissatisfaction. From their inaction in following up with us we concluded that they did not care in any way about our satisfaction and, quite frankly, we expected much better business practices from a member of the Better Business Bureau.
Desired Settlement: Practice what they preach! C. Harper's actions in my case are a clear violation of their stated commitment to customer satisfaction. Had they subscribed to their commitment to make my satisfaction their number one concern, they would have followed up with me in some manner after my last service visit. Perhaps a re-thinking of their business approach when it comes to satisfaction surveys would help. It seems that the level of effort given to "good" service appointments far exceeds the level of effort given to "bad" service appointments.
Better Business Bureau 06-02-2015
The response by C. Harper dated June 2, 2015 does not address the primary issues associated with the subject complaint, specifically that they returned the car to our possession with a "new" problem that did not exist when we dropped the car off for transmission repair, that they failed to properly diagnose the cause of the problem, and that they quoted us nearly $1,500 for unneeded repairs. Furthermore, the response contains a number of misleading or false statements as follows:
1. The response states that they "understand that the customer is frustrated with the noises in his vehicle." - This statement is misleading in that the primary frustration was with the "new" noises that did not exist before the car was dropped off for transmission repair.
2. The response states that "the brakes did not have to come apart to remove the transmission." - This statement is misleading in that C. Harper stated to us that ****** ************* failed to re-anchor the brake lines properly and that was the cause of the loud banging noises when we first returned the vehicle after the transmission service. This acknowledgement by C. Harper is direct evidence that ****** ************* did disassemble the brakes to some degree when they worked on the car. Furthermore, C. Harper could not have any direct knowledge of the extent of brake disassembly unless they were present at ****** ************* when they were performing the work.
3. The response states that "the struts were worn out and that's why we recommended them." - This statement is false since it was determined by a third party mechanic that the struts were fine. It is also misleading in that they quote the car's mileage as a contributor for them wearing out without considering the type of mileage the car has experienced. Given its age, the car has been driven mostly highway miles which has much less of an adverse impact on the service life of struts than city miles.
4. The response states that they "also replaced a rear panel in the vehicle that the customer states the third party damaged." - This statement is false in that the complaint does not allege that ****** ************* caused the damage. The complaint simply states that the damage was new and C. Harper repaired it.
5. The response states that "you have to do nothing in rear of the vehicle to take out the transmission." - This statement is misleading in that is related to the false statement presented in Item #4 above. it should be noted that work was performed by C. Harper on the interior of the vehicle on the same side the new interior damage was noted; that work was related to a recall for the driver's seat. From my perspective, who caused it is irrelevant and this particular issue was resolved to my satisfaction.
6. The response states that "we have paid for and done as much as we are going to do." - This statement is misleading in that it has nothing to do with pertinent aspects of the complaint and infers that some form of compensation is sought through the filing of this complaint. The complaint specifically states that it is not about money. Furthermore, the acknowledgement by C. Harper that they have done as much as they are going to do is irrelevant since the problem has already been repaired.
Given the number of misleading and/or false statements described above, I cannot accept C. Harper's response as a form of resolution to the complaint. I can only hope that any further response offered by C. Harper works toward the desired outcome as set forth in the original complaint filing.
Better Business Bureau
While I do appreciate the apology for my inconvenience, the response by C. Harper simply restates their position without any direct rebuttal to the specific issues raised in the complaint. From my perspective, C. Harper has chosen the easy road as a business entity by simply restating their original position without any supporting rebuttal or pertinent acknowledgement of the facts surrounding the complaint. Unfortunately, their form of response was not unexpected given that any acknowledgement of wrongdoing would result in C. Harper admitting fault in matters related to problems which developed after my vehicle was left in their possession, including their failure to properly diagnose the cause of the "new" front-end noise, and their subsequent recommendation to perform unnecessary repairs based on their misdiagnosis. Given the nature of C. Harper's latest response, I see no practical way to resolve the complaint at this time and formally request that the Better Business Bureau maintain the complaint on file without formal resolution.
|12/24/2014||Problems with Product/Service | Complaint Details Unavailable|