BBB Logo

Better Business Bureau ®
Start With Trust®
In Central Oklahoma

BBB Business Review

BBB Accredited Business since 05/11/1973

D. Watts & Sons Enterprises, LLC

(405) 232-90332712 W. Sheridan, Oklahoma CityOK 73107

BBB Business Reviews may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.

BBB Accreditation

A BBB Accredited Business since 05/11/1973

BBB has determined that D. Watts & Sons Enterprises, LLC meets BBB accreditation standards, which include a commitment to make a good faith effort to resolve any consumer complaints. BBB Accredited Businesses pay a fee for accreditation review/monitoring and for support of BBB services to the public.

BBB accreditation does not mean that the business' products or services have been evaluated or endorsed by BBB, or that BBB has made a determination as to the business' product quality or competency in performing services.

Reason for Rating

BBB rating is based on 16 factors. Get the details about the factors considered.

Factors that raised D. Watts & Sons Enterprises, LLC's rating include:

  • Length of time business has been operating.
  • Complaint volume filed with BBB for business of this size.
  • Response to 1 complaint(s) filed against business.
  • Resolution of complaint(s) filed against business.
  • BBB has sufficient background information on this business.

Customer Complaints SummaryRead complaint details

1 complaint closed with BBB in last 3 years | 1 closed in last 12 months
Complaint TypeTotal Closed Complaints
Problems with Product / Service1
Advertising / Sales Issues0
Billing / Collection Issues0
Delivery Issues0
Guarantee / Warranty Issues0
Total Closed Complaints 1

Customer Reviews Summary Read customer reviews

0 Customer Reviews on D. Watts & Sons Enterprises, LLC
Customer Experience Total Customer Reviews
Positive Experience 0
Neutral Experience 0
Negative Experience 0
Total Customer Reviews 0

Complaint Breakdown by ResolutionAbout Complaint Details

Complaint Resolution Log (1)BBB Closure Definitions
05/01/2014Problems with Product / Service | Read Complaint Details

Additional Notes

Complaint Category: Services resulted in additional damage (exp. Damaged product during shipping)

Complaint: Broken and unreported damage to the sprinkler system which they pretended to have fixed.
****** and another worker came out on March 12 to clean out my lateral lines.    They worked most of the day, and after cleaning out the laterals, they proceeded to repair water lines they had broken in the same area they had broken and repaired back in November when they had come out for their original diagnosis of my septic problem. Then ****** said I shouldn't run the sprinkler system for several days because the drain field was pretty wet and needed to dry out.   They did not test the sprinkler system to make sure it was working okay.   A few days later I turned on that zone of the sprinkler system, it did not work and I could see water bubbling out of the ground near one of the holes they had dug.   I called Fosters and asked that ****** call me, explaining the problem and asking that he return soon to repair the line as I had to keep the fescue seeds I had just scattered over the repair site moist.   When I didn't hear from him, I called again the next day, and again the following day, and again...    He finally called me back a full week after I had first called.  He advised me that he had talked to his dad (the owner of Fosters?) who told him he is prohibited by the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) from repairing a water line within 10' of a lateral line.   Hmmmm, why were they able to repair the very same line in November when they did their diagnosis of my problem and broke it?   Why was I not informed of this DEQ rule at an earlier date prior to the job?   Why did he wait an entire week to get back with me?   
I called a sprinkler system company and he came out to repair the water line.   He dug up the line and it was obvious that ****** had to be aware that that pipe was broken when he did the job ... the pipe was completely broken in half and the two ends were about 18" apart.   One end had been pulled up almost to the surface and laterally away from the other.   There is no way ****** could have been unaware of the situation.   The sprinkler specialist repaired the line and we tested that zone to be sure it was working.   Well guess what, it still had no pressure.    We walked around and found another place where water was bubbling out of the ground.   This site was the same place where lines were broken in November when they came out for a diagnosis  AND where ****** and the other worker were lying on the ground supposedly repairing a break after cleaning out the lateral lines.   The sprinkler specialist dug down to the pipe and found that the two ends ****** had been working on did not even meet ... there was a gap between the two pipes.   
Now, if it is Foster's policy to not fix breaks, that should have been pointed out prior to doing the job, especially since they had repaired pipes on a previous trip in November, which to me indicated that if lines were broken during the clean out job, they would be repaired.   And one the day of the lateral line clean out ****** had asked me to turn off the breaker to the water wells so they could fix the breaks in the line, and he and the other worker had  laid on the ground for a good long time on that March12 afternoon pretending to fix the break.   it was highly unethical for him to lead me to believe that repairs had been made and advise that I should wait a few days to run the sprinkler system  so the ground could dry out,.  Since he obviously was knowingly leaving me with broken water lines, he could have at least told me about the breaks and marked where the breaks were so repairs could be made in a more timely  and less costly manner.   I certainly wouldn't have done hours of work on leveling and smoothing out the ruts and holes or wasted $50 worth of seeds by putting them out before I had a working sprinkler system.
This deceit is overwhelming evidence of a lack of ethics.

Initial Business Response
****** worked on the broken sprinkler lines and to his knowledge they were fixed before he covered them back up. He ask Ms. ******** to turn off the main water supply to fix the break, after he fixed the break he had her turn the water back on and seen no leaks before he covered it back up. Fosters is not responsible to fix broken sprinkler lines that are within 10 ft of the lateral lines,(this is a DEQ requirement), which Ms. ********'s were. ****** should have let Ms. ******** know the first time he was there that she was in violation of code. He was not trying to pull a fast one by telling her to not turn on her sprinklers he was concerned about the drain field being over saturated, therefore causing her septic system not to work. We stand behind our employees judgements, however we also like to make sure our customers are happy. We are willing to reimburse Ms. ******** $106 for the seeds and her labor.

Initial Consumer Rebuttal
(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
So which of the two opposing stories are you sticking with, (a) ****** "fixed sprinkler lines before he covered them back up", or (b) he didn't fix them because they were near lateral lines? It can't be both!

If you go with option (a), then that is an out and out lie. They did repair one break in a water line going to a water spigot. But there were TWO breaks in sprinkler system lines , one being about 2" away from the broken water line going to the water spigot and the other about 40' away from that site. And turning the well breaker back on to see if there were leaks before covering the pipe up could not indicate a sprinkler line was fixed. You would have had to either turn on the sprinkler system to realize that fact, OR you could simply look at the two ends of a pipe and notice the blatantly obvious fact that they are not even touching each other...a real no-brainer! When the sprinkler repairman dug down to these pipes it was immediately plain to see that they were not even close to being intact, and there is no way ****** could have believed they were "fixed".

If you go with the (b) option, then you are implying that a DEQ requirements prevented them from repairing the breaks. This scenario is contrary to your above mentioned statement that he "fixed the sprinkler lines before he covered them back up." Furthermore, wouldn't you think the right thing to do in this case would have been to advise me they weren't fixing the two obviously broken sprinkler lines and marked where the breaks were so the sprinkler repairman could have more easily found them? Instead, he just told me not to run the sprinkler for a few days. He was not "trying to pull a fast one"? Really?

And why did he wait an entire week after I first called to report the sprinkler didn't work before calling me back? Could that be because he was waiting to be sure my check had cleared the bank? Your declaration of support for ******'s judgment, as well as the rest of your incoherent response, is a testament to your own lack of ethics. My primary concern that other potential customers need to know of your deceitful practices overshadows your offer to reimburse me $106 to clear your conscience (and the complaint). I do not accept your response.

Final Business Response
By DEQ requirements sprinkler lines are not supposed to be within 10 ft of lateral lines. If we are digging up lateral lines to clean them and we hit them, although not required to fix them we will try. There is no guarantee that the problem will be fixed. To our employees knowledge the sprinkler lines were working when he left. We will send the customer a check in the amount of $248, we have had a A+ standing with the BBB for the past 41 years and we are not out to deceive anyone. It is unfortunate that this customer was not satisfied, for that we are sorry. We hope that this will resolve this issue as it is time consuming and there appears to be no resolution that will appease the customer.

Final Consumer Response
(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
This provider continually denies knowledge of broken lines when workers departed yet there is no way they could have been unaware of the dismal situation they were leaving. This is extremely deceitful and future potential customers should be aware of their lack of honesty.

Industry Comparison| Chart

Septic Tanks & Systems Contractors & Dealers, Storm Shelters

Additional Information

BBB file opened: 01/01/2063Business started: 01/01/1937Business started locally: 01/01/1961
Type of Entity


Contact Information
Principal: Ms. Donnie Watts (President)Customer Contact: Ms. Twilla Watts (Secretary)
Number of Employees


Business Category

Septic Tanks & Systems Contractors & Dealers, Storm Shelters

Products & Services

This company offers cleaning, repair & installation of septic tank systems.

Alternate Business Names
Foster Septic Tank Cleaning, Foster Septic Tank Cleaning Stockyards Office

Map & Directions

Map & Directions

Address for D. Watts & Sons Enterprises, LLC

2712 W. Sheridan

Oklahoma City, OK 73107

To | From


1 Locations

  • 2712 W. Sheridan 

    Oklahoma City, OK 73107

Industry Comparison ChartX

The information in the table below represents an industry comparison of businesses which are of the same relative size. This is based on BBB's database of businesses located in Central Oklahoma. Businesses may engage in more than one type of business. The percent of time the business engages in a type of business is not accounted for. There is no known industry standard for the number of complaints a business can expect. The volume of business and number of transactions may have a bearing on the number of complaints received by BBB.

*D. Watts & Sons Enterprises, LLC is in this range.


Types of Complaints Handled by BBB

BBB handles the following types of complaints between businesses and their customers so long as they are not, or have not been, litigated:

  • Advertising or Sales
  • Billing or Collection
  • Problems with Products or Services
  • Delivery
  • Guarantee or Warranty

We do not handle workplace disputes, discrimination claims or claims about the quality of health or legal services.


BBB Complaint Process

Your complaint will be forwarded to the company within two business days. The company will be asked to respond within 14 days, and if a response is not received, a second request will be made. You will be notified of the company's response when we receive it (or notified that we received no response). Complaints are usually closed within 30 business days.


BBB began including text of consumer complaints and business responses in BBB Business Reviews on July 1, 2013 for complaints filed on that date and thereafter. This includes all complaints that meet our reporting guidelines and that are filed electronically. We also report on the resolution of the complaint, as determined by BBB.


Industry Tips for Septic Tanks & Systems Contractors & Dealers


What is BBB Advertising Review?

BBB promotes truth in advertising by contacting advertisers whose claims conflict with the BBB Code of Advertising. These claims come to our attention from our internal review of advertising, consumer complaints and competitor challenges. BBB asks advertisers to prove their claims, change ads to make offers more clear to consumers, and remove misleading or deceptive statements.


What government actions does BBB report on?

BBB reports on known significant government actions involving business' marketplace conduct.


About BBB Business Review Content and Services

Some Better Business Bureaus offer additional content and services in BBB Business Reviews. The additional content and services are typically regional in nature or, in some cases, a new product or service that is being tested prior to a more general release. Not all enhanced content and services are available at all Better Business Bureaus.


Thank you for your feedback.

Help us improve by taking our survey.


What is a BBB Business Review?

We offer free reviews on businesses that include background, licensing, consumer experience and other information such as governmental actions that is known to BBB. These reviews are provided for businesses that are BBB accredited and also for businesses that are not BBB accredited.


BBB Reporting Policy

As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business.

BBB Business Reviews are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. Information in this BBB Business Review is believed reliable but not guaranteed as to accuracy.

BBB Business Reviews generally cover a three-year reporting period. BBB Business Reviews are subject to change at any time.