BBB Accredited Business since
Phone: (763) 732-8731 View Additional Phone Numbers 10550 County Road 81 Ste 206, Maple Grove, MN 55369
4 of 9 images | See All Images >>
BBB Business Reviews may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.
Building your home improvement dream with more than 30 years experience in the home building & remodeling industry, your remodel isn't just about lumber, drywall & nails. With our complete remodel process, we take care of it all from start to finish.
Request a Quote
View Business Review Inquiries
A BBB Accredited Business since
BBB has determined that J. Brothers Home Improvements meets BBB accreditation standards, which include a commitment to make a good faith effort to resolve any consumer complaints. BBB Accredited Businesses pay a fee for accreditation review/monitoring and for support of BBB services to the public.
BBB accreditation does not mean that the business' products or services have been evaluated or endorsed by BBB, or that BBB has made a determination as to the business' product quality or competency in performing services.
Reason for Rating
BBB rating is based on 13 factors. Get the details about the factors considered.
Factors that raised the rating for J. Brothers Home Improvements include:
- Length of time business has been operating
- Complaint volume filed with BBB for business of this size
- Response to 2 complaint(s) filed against business
- Resolution of complaint(s) filed against business
Customer Complaints Summary Read complaint details
|Complaint Type||Total Closed Complaints|
|Problems with Product/Service||1|
|Total Closed Complaints||2|
Customer Reviews Summary Read customer reviews
|Customer Experience||Total Customer Reviews|
|Total Customer Reviews||0|
Licensing, Bonding or Registration
This business is in an industry that may require professional licensing, bonding or registration. BBB encourages you to check with the appropriate agency to be certain any requirements are currently being met.
These agencies may include:
Minnesota Secretary of State
180 State Office Bldg, 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Saint Paul MN 55155
Phone Number: (651) 296-2803
Type of Entity
Business ManagementCharles Johnson, President Teri Johnson, Vice President
Contractors - General Deck Builder Basement - Remodeling Bathroom Remodeling Remodeling Services Kitchen Remodeling
Service AreaTwin Cities Metro Area
Products & Services
According to the information provided by J. Brothers Home Improvements this company offers residential remodeling services and handyman needs.
Industry TipsForeclosure Services Remodeling your home
10550 County Road 81 Ste 206
Maple Grove, MN 55369 (763) 732-8731 Directions
What is a BBB Business Review?
We offer free reviews on businesses that include background, licensing, consumer experience and other information such as governmental actions that is known to BBB. These reviews are provided for businesses that are BBB accredited and also for businesses that are not BBB accredited.
About BBB Business Review Content & Services:
Some Better Business Bureaus offer additional content & services in BBB Business Reviews.
The additional content & services are typically regional in nature or, in some cases, a new product or service that is being tested prior to a more general release.
Not all enhanced content & services are available at all Better Business Bureaus.
Types of Complaints Handled by BBB
BBB handles the following types of complaints between businesses and their customers so long as they are not, or have not been, litigated:
- Advertising or Sales
- Billing or Collection
- Problems with Products or Services
- Guarantee or Warranty
We do not handle workplace disputes, discrimination claims or claims about the quality of health or legal services.
BBB Complaint Process
Your complaint will be forwarded to the business within two business days. The business will be asked to respond within 14 days, and if a response is not received, a second request will be made. You will be notified of the business's response when we receive it (or notified that we received no response). Complaints are usually closed within 30 business days.
What is BBB Advertising Review?
BBB promotes truth in advertising by contacting advertisers whose claims conflict with the BBB Code of Advertising. These claims come to our attention from our internal review of advertising, consumer complaints and competitor challenges. BBB asks advertisers to prove their claims, change ads to make offers more clear to consumers, and remove misleading or deceptive statements.
What government actions does BBB report on?
BBB reports on known government actions that are relevant to the business's marketplace dealings with the public.
BBB Reporting Policy
As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business.
BBB Business Reviews are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. Information in this BBB Business Review is believed reliable but not guaranteed as to accuracy.
BBB Business Reviews generally cover a three-year reporting period. BBB Business Reviews are subject to change at any time.
Additional Phone Numbers
- (763) 732-8732(Phone)
Complaint Trends - Last 3 Years
Customer Review Trends
BBB Customer Review Rating plus BBB Rating Overview
BBB Customer Reviews Rating represents the customers opinions of the business. The Customer Review Rating is based on the number of positive, neutral and negative customer reviews posted that are calculated to produce a score.
|Customer Review Experience||Value|
|Positive Review||5 points per review|
|Neutral Review||3 points per review|
|Negative Review||1 point per review|
BBB letter grades represent the BBB's opinion of the business. The BBB grade is based on BBB file information about the business. In some cases, a business' grade may be lowered if the BBB does not have sufficient information about the business despite BBB requests for that information from the business.
BBB Letter Grade Scale
Star Rating scale
BBB Customer Review Rating plus BBB Rating is not a guarantee of a business' reliability or performance, and BBB recommends that consumers consider a business' BBB Rating and Customer Review Rating in addition to all other available information about the business. If the BBB Rating is NR then only Customer Reviews are used for the Star Rating.
Problems with Product/Service
Read Complaint Details
Complaint: The contractor built an addition onto our house and the roof leaked within the first 14 months. The contractor has not fixed the leak yet. The contractor built an addition onto our house and finished it 12/07, by 2/08 the roof was leaking. Over the next 6 years the contractor has been out to look at the problem and has not fixed it yet. He keeps saying it's a vent problem, from a bathroom he put in. The last time I talked to him was 2/24/14 and he said he would call me the following week to set up an appointment, at this time he mentioned the venting problem again. He did not call me to set up an appointment. I paid over $100,000 to this contractor and he has side stepped the repair on the roof for 7 years now. Its time for action.
Desired Settlement: I want the roof repaired or the vent problem repaired, whatever it takes to stop the leak. The leak is getting worse. I can not sell this house with a leaking roof, whenever that will be.
Business Response: Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2014/03/19) */ We have worked with this client many times. The problem comes up in the winter. We are working with him again and have set up Tuesday, April 1 to meet and investigate the problem. It is one of two things: 1. the bath fan exhaust has become disconnected and frosts up and then melts. 2. Ice dam caused by snow accumulating on roof which the Owner will need to keep the snow off in this location. We have water tested and found no leaks. The problem only occurs in the winter. Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (3000, 7, 2014/03/19) */ (The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.) The section of roof where the snow accumulates is the east side that can not be cleared in the winter, it's a very had part of the house to get at,I would have to get on the roof to clear the snow off. I got other bids on this remodel and the other contractors mentioned posible problems with the new roof line, our contractor had no reservations on doing a new roof line. The water test mentioned was done only on the west side two years ago and I was told to keep the snow away from the roof line at that time, so I went and bought a roof/snow rake and everytime it snows I rake it off and it still leaks. The contractor is coming over on 4/1/2014 to water test the east side and posibly open the roof up for a good inspection, I hope he finds the proplem and can stop the leak. If the proplem is caused by snow and ice build up I would like the contractor to redo the roof line,maybe a roof over the roof, some type of barrier so the snow can not accumulate on the east side of the addition. As mantioned in the contractors response, the owner will have to keep the snow off this location, I view this as an unexceptible solution, I'm 61 years old and the roof is a 6/12 pitch, very steep and unsafe to walk on. This is an area that the snow rake can not reach. If the contractor wants to come out and shovel the east side of the roof off every time it snows he can use my ladder and shovel. Final Business Response /* (4000, 12, 2014/04/02) */ We were scheduled to come out and look at it on Tuesday, April 1, and make any repairs, etc. It was snowing and blowing so the client was called and we rescheduled for next week because the weather this week isn't going to cooperate. An exact day has not been set with the client. We will be contacting him at the end of this week pending the weather. Final Consumer Response /* (3000, 10, 2014/04/02) */ (The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.) The section of roof where the snow accumulates is the east side that can not be cleared in the winter, it's a very had part of the house to get at,I would have to get on the roof to clear the snow off. I got other bids on this remodel and the other contractors mentioned posible problems with the new roof line, our contractor had no reservations on doing a new roof line. The water test mentioned was done only on the west side two years ago and I was told to keep the snow away from the roof line at that time, so I went and bought a roof/snow rake and everytime it snows I rake it off and it still leaks. The contractor is coming over on 4/1/2014 to water test the east side and posibly open the roof up for a good inspection, I hope he finds the proplem and can stop the leak. If the proplem is caused by snow and ice build up I would like the contractor to redo the roof line,maybe a roof over the roof, some type of barrier so the snow can not accumulate on the east side of the addition. As mantioned in the contractors response, the owner will have to keep the snow off this location, I view this as an unexceptible solution, I'm 61 years old and the roof is a 6/12 pitch, very steep and unsafe to walk on. This is an area that the snow rake can not reach. If the contractor wants to come out and shovel the east side of the roof off every time it snows he can use my ladder and shovel.
Read Complaint Details
Complaint: Contractor was hired for remodeling project. Project was delayed, communication was poor & was major issue with materials. Customer is not happy. J. Brothers Home Improvements was contracted on March 25th for a remodeling project on our home to build a 12 x 14 deck up to the second floor, install a patio door on second floor out to the deck, and clean-up of the inside kitchen were the patio door was to be installed such as drywall, move electrical, etc. Owners were told by contractor that the work would take about 2 -3 weeks to complete. The project start was delayed several months due to various excuses by the contractor. Work on the project did not begin until June 27th of 2013. Even after work begin the schedule of the construction crew was sporadic and seemed to be delayed for many various reasons. Sometimes the contractor would not call the owner back for several days when the owner would call to get an update on the progress of the work. The owner requested a cost of the patio door and this was not given to the owners. This request was made during the negotiations of the contract time-frame. To this date the owners still do not have this information. The siding on the second level outside of house around the patio door was installed was not replaced to match the rest of the siding on the house. The contractor did not research and obtain the siding at the beginning of the project or communicate this problem to the owner until very late in the project. The owner is now stuck with miss-matched siding and will need to re-side the entire house or pay another contractor to re-side the area around the patio door. The siding on the outside of the house seems to be of lower quality then the siding on the rest of the house therefore must have been a lower cost in materials for the contractor. Had the owners known about the issue with the siding up front the owners would have been able to make better informed decisions about the project from the start. The owner had to take time away from work to do their own research for the siding. The contractor replaced the siding with a lower quality siding that does not match the rest of the siding on the house. The delivery, time miss-management and miss-communication, and continual delays throughout the project caused a poor experience for the owner, the hassle of living in a construction zone for an entire summer, time away from work and not being able to enjoy the remodel the owner planned on having completed within several weeks. The date is now September 24th 2013 and the project is still not completed. The owners initiated this project in the spring of 2013 and it is now fall of 2013. The owner has made all payments on the contract payment schedule up to date and on-time. The last remaining payment on the payment schedule is due. However the owner should receive a refund due to the problems in the project and the problem with the miss-matched siding. The owner tried to work with the contractor for a refund of 50% of the remaining balance of $3,850. The contractor was rude, offered poor customer service and offered a refund of $100 along with demanding payment and rushed completion of the final work on the project knowing the owner is not happy with the project. This is not equal to the amount of problems that occurred during the project.
Desired Settlement: To resolve the dispute the owner would like for the contractor to: * Give a credit of 50% of the remaining balance of $3,850. * Produce a receipt for the cost of the patio door. Owner in return will make the final payment (after credit is applied) in full upon final completion of the remaining work on the project.
Business Response: Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2013/09/25) */ Case #******* Timeline: March 7 Client contacted Contractor for deck quote March 11 First meeting between client and Contractor March 25 Quote sent to client April 3 Quote for patio door only sent to client May 9 Sent copies of plans to client May 21 Signed contract for deck and patio door May 25 Received Construction deposit At this time, the door was ordered and the permit applied for. The door was several weeks out. The weather did not cooperate in early June. The rain delayed other projects which pushed back the start date for the client's deck project too. June 25 The deck was squared and the footings dug June 26 Footings inspected and poured June 28, July 1 and July 3 Construction of deck July 10 Installation of patio door Now began the saga with the exterior siding * Contractor contacted all our siding vendors * None of the contractor's siding vendors could locate the siding * The siding is no longer produced * The client said ***** Lumber in Minneapolis had the siding * Contractor went to ***** Lumber and told no do not have the siding, it is textured and do not make the smooth anymore * Client insisted ***** Lumber had the siding * Contractor went again to ***** Lumber and spoke to another sales person, told the same thing only have it in textured, not smooth as it is not produced any longer July 29 Trimmed the interior of the door, planned to trim it with the siding but delayed because siding could not be found July 30 Trimmed the skylight At this point, the clients were told of other options, both him and her at various times with the contractor August 8 Drawings of what the area could look like with different options were sent to the clients August 12 Client wanted more, sent pictures of houses with different options Client out of town on vacation for one week No decision made on options, contractor spoke to them again about options and decided to make up sample boards Yes, contractor busy and not always able to return calls on the same day September 12 The made up samples of what the siding could look like were delivered to the client September 18 Installed siding option that client chose, client happy with choice September 23 Invoiced client for remaining balance, client verbally told contractor they should receive a discount, offered $100 discount September 24 Client notified contractor that they had registered complaint to Better Business Bureau September 25 Painted siding, received complaint from Better Business Bureau, first time contractor told that client wanted 50% off the remaining balance due As seen in the above timeline the project was not agreed upon until the end of May. As may be recalled, the beginning of June was a terrible month for exterior construction work. The start was delayed on the deck. The patio door was also delayed even though it was ordered on May 31. This was beyond the contractor's control. This was not expected as that is not normal to have a patio door take longer than three weeks. The plan was to install the door at the same time as the construction of the deck. Because of the larger demand for building supplies, we began to experience delays with the arrival of construction products. This could not be controlled by the contractor. When the patio door came in, the contractor could not install it immediately because of other projects that needed to be finished. As soon as the timing worked with projects, the door was installed. The clients were happy with their deck and door. The siding now proved to be a problem. The existing siding on the house appeared to be a siding that would not be a problem to match. A job had just been done with the same Dutch lap siding but in a textured finish. The contractor assumed it was available in smooth also. Unfortunately the siding is no longer being produced. The contractor tried to locate it and no one had any in their existing stock. Sidings that were close to the product were offered but the clients said no, they wanted the exact same. At this point the client tried to find the siding. The client said it was available at ***** Lumber-twice the contractor went to ***** in person and spoke to two different sales people and was told the same thing. The siding that ***** Lumber had was the same siding but was textured unlike the client's siding which is smooth. At this point in time, many lengthy conversations occurred between the client and contractor with the contractor explaining other options. Because the patio door is in a "popout", there were many options available to put around the exterior of the door. Some of the options are what some home owners choose to purposely do to accent a "popout" area. At no point was the contractor rude in these conversations. Drawings were done and pictures were sent to the client of options. They were unable to make a decision and several more lengthy conversations were done between the client and the contractor. It was then decided to do up samples so the client could hold them up to their house and physically/visually get the idea what the various options could look like. The client finally made a decision and the option of smooth cedar plywood with Mirotech 1" x 3" batten boards was chosen. The client then called to say they did not like it. The client said we should re-side the entire house so it matches. Then said they should receive a discount. The contractor said that giving a discount doesn't make people happy and we wanted them happy with their project which is why we worked with them to give them as many options as were available. Client then decided the contractor should re-side the entire house to make it all match. This was unacceptable to the contractor. The client said we should have explored the siding before we started and the contractor said would you not have done the patio door and deck then? The client said they would have thought longer about it. They also said that when they replace windows in the future, they would be replacing the siding as well. We are sorry that they are not happy with the siding issue, but the contractor did try to do everything possible to make it look nice and please the client. Final Consumer Response /* (4200, 14, 2013/11/01) */ (The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.) J Brothers did not directly acknowledge our complaint in the last response, which continues to be unacceptable and displays a lack of care and respect for us as customers. All of our concerns have been disregarded. We feel taken advantage of, threatened, and as if we are being treated as non-paying customers. ALL PAYMENTS have been made as scheduled, and are UP TO DATE. The project has not technically been completed as the final inspection has NOT been done, therefore the final balance is not yet due. Per the contract, the balance is DUE UPON COMPLETION . * We continue to be dissatisfied with the project and the lack of customer service from J Brothers. * We still haven't received a solution to rectify the problems, except OUR request for a 50% discount of the remaining balance. * We are stuck with low quality, non-matching siding, which can affect the value/selling of our house. * The project ran excessively over the amount of time it should have. Delays were not all because of weather or waiting to search for siding. Many delays were made due to random excuses by the contractor. * We did not receive what was expected from the project or contractor in the level or service or materials. We would still like to come to a resolution with J Brothers rather than filing a court claim. We are negotiable on a credit for the issues on this project, although we feel that 50% credit of the remaining balance is fair. Once all issues are addressed properly and a resolution is agreed upon, we will be more than happy to write a check. We were misled by J Brothers' advertising of "complete home remodeling to your total satisfaction," as it does not reflect what we have experienced during this project. According to the contract, any disputes are to be settled with the BBB, mediation and finally, in conciliation court. If a resolution is not met by October 18, 2013, our attorney will be filing a case in conciliation court. The remaining balance will be paid once the following conditions are met: * Need invoice (with the correct date) for the remaining balance of $1925 (after 50% reduction of $3850). * Receipt for the patio door ONLY, so that we can use it for tax purposes. * Final inspection completed and passed by the City of Eden Prairie. * A receipt in person, marked as PAID, during which final check will be given to the contractor. Final Business Response /* (4000, 9, 2013/10/08) */ The only thing that was not done was a 3' piece of siding on each side of the patio door 8' high. The deck was completely usable. As far as the brand of the door, we quoted an Andersen American Craftsman door. The door we installed was a better door. Sorry we did not clarify that we had gone with a better door. The siding that the customer decided on was not cheaper--it was cedar plywood with 1" x 4" Smarte Siding strips. This actually costs more money than the siding would have been if they were still making the siding. Also, we do not do whole house siding so we would have referred them to a siding contractor. Also, very disappointed with the home owners calling names. We have been accused of being way too honest in our business but never shady. This is the very first complaint of this type. We will send over the invoice for the door for tax purposes when we get paid. We have notified the City of Eden Prairie to not final the deck unless we are present. We will also be putting a mechanic's lien on the property. We have gone out of our way to please them with running around looking for the siding when they insisted it was at locations, drawn pictures, taken photos of projects, made up sample boards which they then approved the design they wanted. We will not accept anything but full payment. Giving money back does not remedy the siding. If we give them money back, we still are the "bad" people. Our goal is always to please our customer and we have gone out of our way to find a solution. If we all knew that the siding was not available, would they still have put in a new door? Probably as they would not have had access to their deck which turned out beautiful! Also, as far as the length of the project--the customer was told 2- 3 weeks from start to finish. Weather delays cannot be helped. We were at 2 weeks and one day when we ran into the siding issue. It would have been done in less than 3 weeks but the customer could not decide on siding. If payment is received by October 15, 2013, we will not proceed with the lien.