BBB Accredited Business since

Handyman Electric, LLC

Phone: (509) 466-0303 View Additional Phone Numbers Serving Spokane County and the outlying areas, Spokane, WA 99208

BBB Business Reviews may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.


Electrical home improvement and repair service.

BBB Accreditation

A BBB Accredited Business since

BBB has determined that Handyman Electric, LLC meets BBB accreditation standards, which include a commitment to make a good faith effort to resolve any consumer complaints. BBB Accredited Businesses pay a fee for accreditation review/monitoring and for support of BBB services to the public.

BBB accreditation does not mean that the business' products or services have been evaluated or endorsed by BBB, or that BBB has made a determination as to the business' product quality or competency in performing services.

Reason for Rating

BBB rating is based on 13 factors. Get the details about the factors considered.

Factors that raised the rating for Handyman Electric, LLC include:

  • Length of time business has been operating
  • Complaint volume filed with BBB for business of this size
  • Response to 1 complaint(s) filed against business
  • Resolution of complaint(s) filed against business

Industry Ratings Comparison | Chart

Customer Complaints Summary Read complaint details

1 complaint closed with BBB in last 3 years | 0 closed in last 12 months
Complaint Type Total Closed Complaints
Advertising/Sales Issues 0
Billing/Collection Issues 0
Delivery Issues 0
Guarantee/Warranty Issues 0
Problems with Product/Service 1
Total Closed Complaints 1

Customer Reviews Summary Read customer reviews

22 Customer Reviews on Handyman Electric, LLC
Customer Experience Total Customer Reviews
Positive Experience 22
Neutral Experience 0
Negative Experience 0
Total Customer Reviews 22

Additional Information

BBB file opened: May 02, 2011 Business started: 12/01/2009 in WA Business started locally: 12/01/2009 Business incorporated 12/19/2009 in WA
Licensing, Bonding or Registration

This business is in an industry that may require professional licensing, bonding or registration. BBB encourages you to check with the appropriate agency to be certain any requirements are currently being met.

These agencies may include:

Department of Revenue Washington State
Department of Revenue ( Public Records Division), PO Box 47478, Olympia WA 98504-7477
Phone Number: 800-647-7706

Washington State Department of Labor & Industries
7273 Linderson Way SW , Olympia WA 98501
Phone Number: 800-647-0982

Washington Secretary of State, Corporations Divison
801 Capitol Way South, P.O. Box 40234, Olympia WA 98504-0234
Phone Number: 360-753-7115
Fax Number: 360-664-8781

Type of Entity

Limited Liability Company (LLC)

Business Management
Mr. Robert Robertson, Owner
Contact Information
Principal: Mr. Robert Robertson, Owner
Business Category

Electricians Insulation Materials - Electric Wire & Cable - Electric Electricians – Residential

Method(s) of Payment
All major credit cards, checks and cash.
Refund and Exchange Policy
We are not a retailer that sells products.  Therefore, we don't offer refunds or exchanges. 
Industry Tips
Contractors - GENERAL ADVICE

Customer Review Rating plus BBB Rating Summary

Handyman Electric, LLC has received 0 out of 5 stars based on 0 Customer Reviews and a BBB Rating of A+.

BBB Customer Review Rating plus BBB Rating Overview

Additional Locations

  • Serving Spokane County and the outlying areas

    Spokane, WA 99208 (509) 466-0303


BBB Customer Review Rating plus BBB Rating Overview

BBB Customer Reviews Rating represents the customers opinions of the business. The Customer Review Rating is based on the number of positive, neutral and negative customer reviews posted that are calculated to produce a score.

Customer Review Experience Value
Positive Review 5 points per review
Neutral Review 3 points per review
Negative Review 1 point per review

BBB letter grades represent the BBB's opinion of the business. The BBB grade is based on BBB file information about the business. In some cases, a business' grade may be lowered if the BBB does not have sufficient information about the business despite BBB requests for that information from the business.

BBB Letter Grade Scale

BBB Rating Value
A+ 5
A 4.66
A- 4.33
B+ 4
B 3.66
B- 3.33
C+ 3
C 2.66
C- 2.33
D+ 2
D 1.66
D- 1.33
F 1
NR -----
Star Rating scale

  Average Score
5 stars 5.00
4.5 stars 4.50-4.99
4 stars 4.00-4.49
3.5 stars 3.50-3.99
3 stars 3.00-3.49
2.5 stars 2.50-2.99
2 stars 2.00-2.49
1.5 stars 1.50-1.99
1 star 0-1.49

BBB Customer Review Rating plus BBB Rating is not a guarantee of a business' reliability or performance, and BBB recommends that consumers consider a business' BBB Rating and Customer Review Rating in addition to all other available information about the business. If the BBB Rating is NR then only Customer Reviews are used for the Star Rating.

Complaint Detail(s)

9/4/2014 Problems with Product/Service | Read Complaint Details

Additional Notes

Complaint: We had a faulty breaker switch that damaged the line for the part of the upper level of the house. We replaced the switch and ran new line, but still did not have power. On 7/22/14 ****** ********* came over and gave us a quote. He said he could troubleshoot and if the problem was small he would fix it for a flat fee. He also suggested that we replace all the breaker switches. We told him that, although we agree with him that they need to be replaced, we would replace them ourselves. When he wrote out the quote he listed the troubleshoot as well as replacement of breakers. After he had written it we told him again that we would not need him to replace the breakers. *** ********* told us that we could line out anything we did not want him to do. On 7/25/14 *** ********* came he began work and we tried not to be in his way. A little while later he left without telling us where he was going. We then looked at the breaker box and all the switches were gone. When he came back we reminded him that we did not want him to replace the switches. *** ********* then showed his irritation and said, "Fine, then I"ll do it for free." We told him that's not what we want. We would pay him for the cost of the switches, but we would not pay him for putting them in. We referred him to our previous conversation and his response in lining out anything we did not want him to do. *** ********* then became even more rude. He finished installing the new switches and then proceeded to tell us he was leaving and would not work for "a liar and a cheat." After *** ********* had left we realized our home air conditioning was not working properly. Since it was a weekend, we had to wait for ******* ******* ******* to come out on Tuesday 7/29/14. They told us that the unit was miswired and that was the reason why the AC was not running. They charged us $96.74 for the service call. After an entire evening trying to figure out the wiring, the next morning 7/30/14 we found that the problem was at the new breaker switch that *** ********* had installed on 7/25. We rewired it correctly and the air conditioning started working properly. From the time *** ********* left our home to the time we were able to get our air conditioning fixed was four days of 98-100 degree heat in Spokane. Our original electrical problem is still not fixed.

Desired Settlement: We would like *** ********* to reimburse us for the AC service call we had to pay for due to his negligence in wiring the breaker. The total cost of the service call is what we request: $96.74.

Business Response:

Before responding to the complaint, I would like to point out that on the day I was to work on the home (7/25/14) ***** was not present.  The only person there was *****.  I understood he was a relative of the homeowner and an electrician in the military.

Thus the allegations are more fiction than factual.

It is difficult for me to understand the complaint.  The last line of the complaint states: “our original electrical problem is still not fixed”.  I did not fix the problem nor did I charge to fix it.  The A/C unit would seem to be a red herring, as it was fixed, presumably by *****, one day after ******* ******* ******* had made a house call and charged $96.74, for what?

The crux of the matter is rather straight forward.  On 7/22/14, I gave ******** a written proposal to (1) Troubleshoot down circuit and (2) Replace circuit breaker parts.

On 7/25/14, I was greeted by *****.  We proceeded to the panel, and ***** watched while I removed all of the circuit breakers.  I advised him I would be gone about an hour while acquiring new breakers.  Upon my return he told me he did not want new breakers.  I stated it would have been nice if he had lined out that part of the proposal, or at least told me before I removed all the circuit breakers, and purchased new ones.  He insisted that I install the old breakers and I responded I would put in the new ones and not charge for the parts or labor.

My concern was, although not expressed, that the house had undergone a remodel, that there was faulty wiring that could cause a fire, that new breakers would trip thus preventing a fire, and that would prevent me from being sued as the cause of the fire.  The cost of the breakers ($80.15) and labor was cheap insurance to avoid a potential serious claim and lawsuit, which surely would follow.

At this point, I told ***** I was leaving and would not perform additional work.  In retrospect, I regret my choice of words, however, I had made the decision to cut and run.  It seemed obvious to me the customer would never be happy, I would expend far more energy than the job required, and more than likely I would not be paid.

In conclusion, I left the house exactly as I found it, with the exception of new Cutler Hammer circuit breakers.  Incidentally, I was not paid for anything, including the new breakers.

I am fully licensed, bonded and insured.  I have been an electrical contractor and electrical administrator for twelve years.  I have a total of nineteen years as an electrician, working in residential/commercial where I gained experience in new construction and remodels.

I formed Handyman Electric in 2009.  It specializes in troubleshooting, repair and formulating creative solutions to challenging projects.  As a perfectionist, I pride myself with doing the job well, arriving on time, providing a clean service and communicating with the customer to provide the service they desire. 


****** *********

Handyman Electric LLC 

Consumer Response: [To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, you must give us a reason why you are rejecting the response. If no reason is received, your complaint will be closed Administratively Resolved]


I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID ******** and have determined that this does not resolve my complaint. For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.

*** ********* was correct in stating that ***** was present on 7/25/14 as I (*********) and my husband ***** were out of town.  However, aside from ***** being present during this altercation, his wife, ****** and daughter, **** were also present, both witnessing *********'s immature, inappropriate and unprofessional behavior toward my brother-in-law.

I will respond to each issue that ********* refutes.  First, he is correct in stating that he did not fix or charge us for "our original electrical problem."  That fact—which he has freely admitted—is the core of the problem.  When we originally called and scheduled him to come, we informed him that our primary concern was to find the cause of our electrical problem, not to replace our circuit breakers.  

On 7/22/14, ***** and I were present during the writing of the proposal.  Before the proposal was written and after discussing with ********* that the breakers did need to be replaced; *****, who has been an electrician in the military for close to 20 years, stated that he could replace them himself at a later date.  When ********* wrote the proposal, he still added “replace circuit breakers” as a line item on the proposal.  ***** and I again told ********* that replacing the circuit breakers would not be something he needed to do.  ********* proceeded to tell us to line out anything we did not want him to work on and he gave us a copy of the proposal—with nothing lined out.  I cannot explain why ********* did not immediately line out the work that he was repeatedly told not to do.  Instead, he instructed us to manually cross out the “replace circuit breakers” line item, if we did not want that done, which ***** did the morning before ********* arrived on Friday, 7/25/14.  At no time did Roberson ask to see our copy of the proposal to confirm what work he was to perform.  Had he done so, or even reviewed the work to be done with ***** that day, he would not have put in unnecessary time working on the circuit breakers.  ********* should have immediately lined out the item that was not wanted and provided the carbon copy to the us to ensure everyone was on the same page.  There seems to be a major disconnect in *********’s work process that led to unnecessary work and confusion.  

********* also states that ***** was present while he removed the breaker switches and that he advised ***** that he would be gone for about an hour to purchase new circuit breakers.  This statement is not true and is a contradiction to later statements by *********.  In fact, had ********* spoken to *****, ***** would have again reiterated that replacing the circuit breaker switches was not in the scope of the job. 

What actually happened is that ***** let ********* in and left him to work and went into the house to work on other projects.  It wasn’t until ****** asked ***** where the electrician had gone that ***** realized ********* had left.  After checking the garage and seeing that all the switches were now missing from the electrical panel, he made the assumption that ********* had left to get new breakers.  When ********* returned, both ****** and **** were present for the conversation between ********* and *****.  ***** told ********* a third time that replacing the breakers—per our conversation on 7/22/14—was not something he was tasked to do.  ********* became irate and started verbalizing statements about having to do work for free.  To that, ***** had to repeat more than once that we were willing to pay him for the cost of the breakers, but that we would not pay him to install them because we had already told him that was not something he was asked to do, again referring to our conversation on 7/22/14.

****** witnessed *********’s rude and unprofessional behavior prior to *********’s saying that he would not do any more work for "a liar and a cheat."  I've never been more shocked at the behavior of someone in the service profession, and I am appalled that a member of my family was treated so unkindly and unprofessional by *********.

********* refuses to admit that he may have incorrectly wired one of the breaker switches.  However, it was after ********* insulted ***** and left my home that the A/C stopped working, despite the fact that it was working perfectly before ********* arrived that morning.  It is not a coincidence that it happened immediately after ********* left.  No one else had touched the breaker, so who else is to blame for this problem?  Following is an explanation for why it was necessary for our call to Spokane Comfort Systems:

Upon our return from our trip on 7/26/14, we immediately noticed that the A/C was not working.  For several days ***** and ***** attempted to fix the A/C problem on their own.  Unaware that the problem was, in fact, an electrical problem, we finally contacted Spokane Comfort Systems—a company that specializes in A/C repair—to come to our home and diagnose our A/C problem.  The A/C tech quickly discovered that the reason the A/C did not work was due to an electrical problem—the condenser unit was only receiving half of the power it needed to operate.  The tech advised that we would need to have the power junction located and checked by a trained electrician, as that was not his company’s area of expertise.  

***** later determined that the A/C’s double-pole breaker at the breaker box that ********* had worked on was incorrectly placed, causing the A/C condenser to only be receiving 110 volts. ***** and ***** repositioned the switches correctly and the condenser began functioning properly.  The facts clearly show that the source of the A/C problem began immediately following *********'s unprofessional departure from our home on 7/25/14.  If ********* had not incorrectly replaced the switches in the circuit breaker, we would not have needed to pay Spokane Comfort Systems $96.74 to discover that an electrical issue was the cause of our A/C failure.  (Note:  As a result, the A/C—that was functioning perfectly before *********’s visit—failed to operate during five of the hottest days of the summer, when we needed it the most.)

In his response, ********* further attacks our integrity by stating that he felt we would not pay him, which is why he left.  This claim has no merit, as ***** repeatedly told ********* that he would be paid for the cost of the new breaker switches.  Regardless, the fact remains that ********* never actually worked on the real reason for his service—to find the original electrical problem as was previously agreed upon.  Although we, ***** and I, were gone, we had left a check in *****'s possession to pay for the work ********* was retained to do, which did NOT include work that he was told repeatedly NOT to do.  This failure traces back to *********'s neglect in crossing out, on both copies of the proposal, the work we did not want him to do.  If he had done that, he would not have wasted his time doing extra work replacing breakers and making a mistake that cost us time and money to fix.

As this is obviously *********'s fault, we respectfully ask that ********* reimburse us the $96.74 for the cost of the A/C service call.

Business Response: I would like to respond to *********, but don’t know where to start.  By her own admission she was not present, and yet she goes on in great detail describing what she imagined occurred.   It is indeed interesting and fanciful, but not at all how I remember the events of that day.  My original response was accurate and forthright; however, I should point out that both parties are out of pocket about the same amount, so I would suggest leaving the matter exactly where it is. 

****** *********
Handyman Electric LLC

Consumer Response: [To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, you must give us a reason why you are rejecting the response. If no reason is received, your complaint will be closed Administratively Resolved]


I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID ******** and have determined that this does not resolve my complaint. For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.

*** ********* states that my detailed description of the events that occurred in July were fanciful because I was not present for the entire altercation. I was there when *** ********* added extra work to the proposal when both myself and my brother-in-law told him that we only wanted to find the source of the electrical problem and nothing else. The rest of the detail was provided by three witnesses, *****, his wife ****** and daughter **** as previously mentioned. I believe that three witnesses has more credibility than one. 

As far as we're concerned this issue is not resolved if *** ********* is not willing to reimburse us for the cost of his mistake.


***** And ********* ********