If yes, click here to login.
BBB Accredited Business sinceAdditional Locations
2 of 2 images | See All Images >>
BBB Business Reviews may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.
Request a Quote
A BBB Accredited Business since
BBB has determined that Austin Rent A Home meets BBB accreditation standards, which include a commitment to make a good faith effort to resolve any consumer complaints. BBB Accredited Businesses pay a fee for accreditation review/monitoring and for support of BBB services to the public.
BBB accreditation does not mean that the business' products or services have been evaluated or endorsed by BBB, or that BBB has made a determination as to the business' product quality or competency in performing services.
Reason for Rating
BBB rating is based on 13 factors. Get the details about the factors considered.
Factors that affect the rating for Austin Rent A Home include:
- Length of time business has been operating
- Complaint volume filed with BBB for business of this size
- Response to 1 complaint(s) filed against business
- Resolution of complaint(s) filed against business
Customer Complaints Summary Read complaint details
|Complaint Type||Total Closed Complaints|
|Problems with Product/Service||1|
|Total Closed Complaints||1|
Customer Reviews Summary Read customer reviews
|Customer Experience||Total Customer Reviews|
|Total Customer Reviews||0|
Licensing, Bonding or Registration
This business is in an industry that may require professional licensing, bonding or registration. BBB encourages you to check with the appropriate agency to be certain any requirements are currently being met.
These agencies may include:
Texas Real Estate Commission
PO Box 12188, Austin TX 78711
Phone Number: (512) 936-3000
Type of Entity
Limited Liability Company (LLC)
Business ManagementMr. David Soriano, Member
Property Management Real Estate Rental Service
Products & Services
Austin Rent A Home sells the following brand(s): AustinRentAHome
Austin Rent A Home offers the following product(s): condos, duplexes, fourplexes, houses, townhouses
Method(s) of Paymentpersonal checks, cashier's checks, money orders
Alternate Business NamesDasor Management & Investment Services, LLC
What is a BBB Business Review?
We offer free reviews on businesses that include background, licensing, consumer experience and other information such as governmental actions that is known to BBB. These reviews are provided for businesses that are BBB accredited and also for businesses that are not BBB accredited.
About BBB Business Review Content & Services:
Some Better Business Bureaus offer additional content & services in BBB Business Reviews.
The additional content & services are typically regional in nature or, in some cases, a new product or service that is being tested prior to a more general release.
Not all enhanced content & services are available at all Better Business Bureaus.
Types of Complaints Handled by BBB
BBB handles the following types of complaints between businesses and their customers so long as they are not, or have not been, litigated:
- Advertising or Sales
- Billing or Collection
- Problems with Products or Services
- Guarantee or Warranty
We do not handle workplace disputes, discrimination claims or claims about the quality of health or legal services.
BBB Complaint Process
Your complaint will be forwarded to the business within two business days. The business will be asked to respond within 14 days, and if a response is not received, a second request will be made. You will be notified of the business's response when we receive it (or notified that we received no response). Complaints are usually closed within 30 business days.
What is BBB Advertising Review?
BBB promotes truth in advertising by contacting advertisers whose claims conflict with the BBB Code of Advertising. These claims come to our attention from our internal review of advertising, consumer complaints and competitor challenges. BBB asks advertisers to prove their claims, change ads to make offers more clear to consumers, and remove misleading or deceptive statements.
What government actions does BBB report on?
BBB reports on known government actions that are relevant to the business's marketplace dealings with the public.
BBB Reporting Policy
As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business.
BBB Business Reviews are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. Information in this BBB Business Review is believed reliable but not guaranteed as to accuracy.
BBB Business Reviews generally cover a three-year reporting period. BBB Business Reviews are subject to change at any time.
Complaint Trends - Last 3 Years
Customer Review Trends
BBB Customer Review Rating plus BBB Rating Overview
BBB Customer Reviews Rating represents the customers opinions of the business. The Customer Review Rating is based on the number of positive, neutral and negative customer reviews posted that are calculated to produce a score.
|Customer Review Experience||Value|
|Positive Review||5 points per review|
|Neutral Review||3 points per review|
|Negative Review||1 point per review|
BBB letter grades represent the BBB's opinion of the business. The BBB grade is based on BBB file information about the business. In some cases, a business' grade may be lowered if the BBB does not have sufficient information about the business despite BBB requests for that information from the business.
BBB Letter Grade Scale
Star Rating scale
BBB Customer Review Rating plus BBB Rating is not a guarantee of a business' reliability or performance, and BBB recommends that consumers consider a business' BBB Rating and Customer Review Rating in addition to all other available information about the business. If the BBB Rating is NR then only Customer Reviews are used for the Star Rating.
Problems with Product/Service
Read Complaint Details
Complaint: Upon moving into a home rented to us by ***** ******* at ****** Rent a Home, we found the house to be unsafe and unsanitary, which violates state and city rental laws. We made ***** aware of the following issues the DAY AFTER WE MOVED IN and countless times over the next 9 months: The house had been swept, but the baseboards were caked in hair, dust, and dirt. There was blood on the floor and wall of the master bathroom. There was a disgusting brown hand print on the back of the master bathroom door. The bathroom downstairs had not been cleaned at all. These sanitary issues were never properly addressed. ***** suggested the cleaning crew should return if we were unsatisfied, but he did not follow through with that offer. He then had the audacity to charge us for cleaning expenses when we moved out, despite the facts that the house was filthy when we moved in but much much cleaner when we moved out. Both the front and back yards were full of cigarette butts, beer bottles, and a variety of trash. The yard had not been serviced before we moved in, so there was a significant amount of overgrowth. ***** relied on the clause in the lease that states the yard is the responsibility of the tenants. When we insisted the yard should be our responsibility moving forward, but there was a reasonable expectation that it be serviced before we moved in, he had someone come out to the house to do almost nothing more than grind down a stump at the side of the house. We were left with the responsibility of cleaning the trash left by the previous tenants. *****, again, had the audacity to charge us for yard maintenance when we moved out, despite the facts that the yard was not serviced when we moved in and it was not in need of being serviced when we moved out. The HVAC vents were caked in very thick dust and dirt and the filters that were in place were falling apart. This issue was addressed by an HVAC specialist months later after ***** made it clear that any failing of the HVAC system would be our responsibility at our expense. The refrigerator and freezer were dirty, as were the inside of many cabinets. Again, these sanitary issues were never properly addressed. The stove was red-tagged due to a gas leak. After the leak was repaired weeks later, an ignitor kept clicking, forcing us to unplug the stove when it was not in use. The stove was finally repaired 7 months into our stay. The garbage disposal was broken and was causing a massive leak, preventing use of the kitchen sink. This was repaired weeks later, leaving us without a usable kitchen sink for far too long. This violated city law regarding what amenities are required to be working properly for a property to be rented. The cabinetry under the sink was severely water damaged as a result of the leak having been left unrepaired for some time. The dishwasher did not work. After multiple visits by the repairman, the dishwasher was finally in working order a full 8 months after we moved in. When we asked the repairman why it had taken so long, he told us the part had been in for months, but ***** would not give him the approval to repair the appliance. A ceiling fan was pulling away from the ceiling and was unsafe. A bathroom lighting fixture was completely rusted, causing it to hiss and work intermittently but never completely. It took 5 months for these safety issues to be repaired. The heat lamp in the master bathroom had caused the popcorn coating on the surrounding ceiling to breakdown and fall off in large chunks. As a result, the heat lamp could not be used. This was never addressed by *****. The carpet on the stairs and in all four bedrooms was soaking wet and filthy. To be clear, it was not damp; it was so wet that stepping on the carpet caused water to pool around my foot. The movers had a difficult time bringing items upstairs because the carpets were slippery, and they could not set wooden furniture in the rooms for fear that the water would cause damage. When the carpets dried, they were very stiff, filthy, and smelled terrible. Vacuuming a 6'x6' area would fill the canister. When the area was vacuumed again, it would fill the canister again, indicating significant deterioration. This issues was never appropriately addressed by *****. When he finally did a walk-thru of the property almost 9 months after we had moved in, 9 months after we had begun providing the lengthy list of issues, he acknowledged that the carpets were in an unacceptable condition and they needed to be replaced. He made a verbal agreement that there would be a refund given to us for the time we spent with filthy carpets and the failure of the movers to complete the job to our satisfaction as a result of the carpets. ***** then charged us for carpet cleaning when we moved out, which violated the verbal agreement he made with us, not to mention it is unconscionable and unethical considering he was made aware of the issues with the carpets the day after we moved in. ***** ******* has used a number of methods to shirk his responsibility for the house not being in an appropriate condition when it was rented to us, and for it remaining in that condition for the majority of our lease term. We were told to list and prioritize our issues, after having already done so repeatedly over 9 months. We were told that we "need to understand" that the repairs are costly and not all of them could be taken care of. We were blamed for not making ****** Rent a Home aware of the issues, but our emails and phone calls began the day after we moved in, and over 100 emails were exchanged during our time there, proving we made continuous efforts to ensure ***** and his office worker ****** were aware of the issues. ***** has repeatedly stated that we have our timeline of events and ****** has hers, but we have all of the emails to prove that the timeline is definitive and not based on his or ******'s interpretation of events. Not to mention, ***** was cc'd on all emails to ******, so blaming her for repair delays is profoundly underhanded. ***** has blamed us for not being available to repairmen, but we repeatedly took time off of work to be at the house, only to have repairmen not show up and not call to cancel/reschedule. ***** has relied on the phrase, "I am not a plumber/electrician/HVAC specialist/general repairman/cleaning person" to avoid the reality that the landlord is ultimately responsible for ensuring a house is safe and sanitary BEFORE it is rented, as well as ensuring the house is safe and sanitary during the rental term. We asked to be let out of our lease early because, after 9 months of paying full rent for a house that was never in an acceptable condition, we had had enough. As far as we're concerned, ***** *******'s blatant and continued violation of both state and city law during our lease voided said lease. He repeatedly relied on the "AS IS" clause in the lease, but that clause cannot and will never make it acceptable for a landlord to violate the law. Because of his negligence and incompetence, we should have been permitted to terminate our lease with no financial penalty to us, allowing him to ensure the house was in an appropriate condition before it was rented to other tenants. Additionally, we have an email exchange between ***** ******* and the owner of the home. Because of our numerous and continuous complaints, the owner did a walk-thru of the home 4 months after we had moved in. He acknowledged all of our concerns as legitimate, and insisted ***** correct the issues ASAP. ***** failed to uphold that agreement.
Desired Settlement: Our total security deposit was $2495: $1695, plus $800 for pets. ***** provided us with a $350 credit for the months we spent without a dishwasher, as it was an amenity listed in the rental ad and on the lease. That would bring our total return to $2845. As a result of *****'s unethical calculations, we have received a total return of $708.21, which leaves $2136.79 (this does not include an amount for the carpet issues, as per *****'s verbal agreement). We each expect to receive a check for $1068.40, totaling the remaining $2136.79 of our security deposit, as *****'s unlawful actions voided our lease agreement and therefore voided any clause in the lease regarding a financial penalty for early termination.
I the time and effort to respond to Ms. ******* complaints earlier and decided to display much of what I sent to their family lawyer and the former tenants:
I have attached the bulk of my response to this email.
On 3/09/2015, I sent BBB a detailed explanation about why I did not accept the response from Austin Rent a Home. ***** *******'s responses were inaccurate and unacceptable, and it should be noted that they are not in accordance with the email evidence I provided. I was permitted to walk thru the property WHILE the previous tenants were still living there. I was promised the home would be cleaned thoroughly and any damaged would be repaired. We did NOT NEED to occupy the house before Austin Rent a Home had ample time for cleaning and repairs; in fact, our move-in date was delayed by Austin Rent a Home under the guise of additional cleaning. Certain issues were addressed with ***** before we occupied the home, specifically the lack of cleanliness both inside and outside, so there was time for those issues to be corrected, but they were not.
***** ******* clearly did not do a walk thru of the property before we moved in. The electrical issues were safety issues which, again, cannot be justified by the "as is" clause. The house was NOT properly cleaned, as there was filth everywhere, including blood on the floor and wall of the bathroom. It doesn't matter to us in the slightest how professional he believes the cleaning company was. He was not professional enough to assess their work firsthand before the home was rented, nor was he professional enough to assess their poor work by doing a walk thru of the property when our complaints were made, starting the day after we moved.
After 8 months of paying for a property that was not in an appropriate condition, we had had enough. We asked to be let out of our lease early, and this is when ***** finally came to the property to assess our concerns. He acknowledged there were areas of the home we had purposefully not been using because they had not been cleaned (kitchen and bathroom cabinets, a downstairs bathroom). He acknowledged that the carpets were in such terrible condition as a result of their inadequate cleaning before move in. Again, it doesn't matter to us in the slightest how professional he believes the carpet cleaning company was, the carpets were filthy and soaking wet when we moved in, which can be confirmed by our moving company. *****'s exact words during his walk thru were, "Now that I see it, I'm on your side." He told us the carpets would need to be replaced, so cleaning them would be a waste for both us and him. We anticipate the owner of the home would not provide the funds to replace the carpets, so ***** charged us for cleaning, despite having told us not to clean because he felt they needed to be replaced. This is unconscionable behavior on *****'s part. We should not be forced to pay for his incompetence and lies.
A house being old is not an excuse for electrical issues which ***** should have known about if he had properly assessed the home before renting it to us. Yes, the safety issues were corrected (both the electrical issues and the stove), but these very finally handled 5 months after we moved in and registered our first complaints. Yes the issues with the HVAC were finally corrected, but again, that was 5 months after we moved in and registered our first complaints. No, the issues with the garbage in the yard were never corrected by Austin Rent a Home, but were instead taken care of by our neighbor who we paid to help us with the yard during our stay. No, the sanitary issues in the house that resulted from an improper cleaning before we moved in were never addressed. To charge us for maid service and yard service is unconscionable, especially when the house was clean when we left and the yard had already been taken care of by our neighbor.
***** ******* has time and time again proven himself to be unethical and dishonest. The age of the home, his personal lack of expertise and subsequent reliance on workmen and their assessment of issues, and the "as is" clause, have constantly been used as excuses for his incompetence with regard to providing us an appropriate rental home. We were always available to contractors and, in fact, we took days off to have the issues handled, only to have the contractors not show up or call us to reschedule, so the excuse that the delay in repairs was somehow our fault is a blatant lie, and there are numerous emails to prove this. ***** did not conduct a firsthand assessment of our complaints until 8 months into our stay, making it easy for him to blame the remaining filth and the condition of the carpets on us, despite the owner of the home confirming our issues during his 3 month walk thru. And again, ***** told us in no uncertain terms, during his walk thru after 8 months, that he saw what we were complaining about, and we should not be held responsible.
I really wish this unethical, dishonest "businessman" would not be allowed to continue getting away with this kind of behavior. We are one of MANY previous tenants who have had their security deposits chopped to pieces based on fraudulent charges, and it is unacceptable. Every one of his justifications for his actions has been a lie. The emails I attached to my 3/09/2015 response prove that, and there are hundreds more of those that deal with additional complaints.
I would appreciate you reopening this complaint and insisting that ***** acknowledge the exorbitant amounts of time it took to rectify safety issues, and the complete lack of correction with regard to sanitary issues. His explanations do not match the email correspondence between us, him, his assistant ******, and the owner. How is it that my complaints and explanations come complete with proof, but his directly contradict that irrefutable proof?
The monetary concessions do not make up for the fraudulent charges that significantly reduced our security deposit.
By the way, ***** finds it "very difficult" to work with me because I refuse to let him get away with lies and incompetence. He has bullied other tenants to the point where they just don't have the energy to continue complaining. I assure you, that won't be the case with me, and I'm under the distinct impression he knows that.