BBB Accredited Business since


Phone: (888) 453-7889 View Additional Phone Numbers 808 Howell St Ste 100, Seattle, WA 98101

BBB Business Reviews may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.


This company offers dog sitting, care, walking and boarding services.

BBB Accreditation

A BBB Accredited Business since

BBB has determined that Rover.Com meets BBB accreditation standards, which include a commitment to make a good faith effort to resolve any consumer complaints. BBB Accredited Businesses pay a fee for accreditation review/monitoring and for support of BBB services to the public.

BBB accreditation does not mean that the business' products or services have been evaluated or endorsed by BBB, or that BBB has made a determination as to the business' product quality or competency in performing services.

Reason for Rating

BBB rating is based on 13 factors. Get the details about the factors considered.

Factors that raised the rating for Rover.Com include:

  • Length of time business has been operating
  • Response to 9 complaint(s) filed against business
  • Resolution of complaint(s) filed against business

Customer Complaints Summary Read complaint details

10 complaints closed with BBB in last 3 years | 8 closed in last 12 months
Complaint Type Total Closed Complaints
Advertising/Sales Issues 2
Billing/Collection Issues 1
Delivery Issues 0
Guarantee/Warranty Issues 0
Problems with Product/Service 7
Total Closed Complaints 10

Customer Reviews Summary Read customer reviews

2 Customer Reviews on Rover.Com
Customer Experience Total Customer Reviews
Positive Experience 0
Neutral Experience 1
Negative Experience 1
Total Customer Reviews 2

Additional Information

BBB file opened: July 16, 2012 Business started: 06/01/2011 Business started locally: 06/01/2011 Business incorporated 10/19/2011 in WA
Licensing, Bonding or Registration

This business is in an industry that may require professional licensing, bonding or registration. BBB encourages you to check with the appropriate agency to be certain any requirements are currently being met.

These agencies may include:

Washington Secretary of State Corporations Division
801 Capitol Way S, Olympia WA 98504
Phone Number: (360) 725-0377

Type of Entity


Business Management
Mr. Aaron Easterly, CEO Brittany Deal, Customer Service Mgr Brandie Gonzales, Director of PR
Contact Information
Principal: Mr. Aaron Easterly, CEO
Customer Contact: Brandie Gonzales, Director of PR
Business Category

Pet Sitting Services Pet Day Care Dog Daycare Pet Shops Advertising - Internet Online Social Media/Networking Pet Services

Hours of Operation
Monday - Friday 9am - 5pm 24 hr Barkline
Alternate Business Names
A Place For Rover Inc

Customer Review Rating plus BBB Rating Summary

Rover.Com has received 0 out of 5 stars based on 0 Customer Reviews and a BBB Rating of A.

BBB Customer Review Rating plus BBB Rating Overview

Additional Locations

  • 808 Howell St Ste 100

    Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 257-0571 (888) 404-3648 (888) 453-7889


BBB Customer Review Rating plus BBB Rating Overview

BBB Customer Reviews Rating represents the customers opinions of the business. The Customer Review Rating is based on the number of positive, neutral and negative customer reviews posted that are calculated to produce a score.

Customer Review Experience Value
Positive Review 5 points per review
Neutral Review 3 points per review
Negative Review 1 point per review

BBB letter grades represent the BBB's opinion of the business. The BBB grade is based on BBB file information about the business. In some cases, a business' grade may be lowered if the BBB does not have sufficient information about the business despite BBB requests for that information from the business.

BBB Letter Grade Scale

BBB Rating Value
A+ 5
A 4.66
A- 4.33
B+ 4
B 3.66
B- 3.33
C+ 3
C 2.66
C- 2.33
D+ 2
D 1.66
D- 1.33
F 1
NR -----
Star Rating scale

  Average Score
5 stars 5.00
4.5 stars 4.50-4.99
4 stars 4.00-4.49
3.5 stars 3.50-3.99
3 stars 3.00-3.49
2.5 stars 2.50-2.99
2 stars 2.00-2.49
1.5 stars 1.50-1.99
1 star 0-1.49

BBB Customer Review Rating plus BBB Rating is not a guarantee of a business' reliability or performance, and BBB recommends that consumers consider a business' BBB Rating and Customer Review Rating in addition to all other available information about the business. If the BBB Rating is NR then only Customer Reviews are used for the Star Rating.

Complaint Detail(s)

8/3/2015 Problems with Product/Service | Read Complaint Details

Additional Notes

Complaint: I reserved a stay for my pet at one of providers. On the day of the drop off the provider refused to honor the boarding commitment and canceled the stay. The provider claimed my pet was too big. However, the provider's page indicated that they accept pet's much bigger and did not raise any objections when the pet;s size was disclosed in the very first email. My issue here is, I want to be able to leave feedback on the provider's page. Rover does not allow me to do so.

Desired Settlement: Allow me to leave feedback on the provider's profile page regarding my experience

Business Response: Hi *******,
We're sorry you had such a poor experience with a Rover sitter. We take last-minute cancellations very seriously, and we know it's disappointing and frustrating when a sitter cancels at the last minute. We did reach out to you about finding another sitter, but we know it may have been too late.

At this time, we only allow pet parents to leave reviews for completed stays. That being said, we're always looking to improve our site, so we'll be sure to share your feedback with our product team.

Thank you so much for leaving your feedback. We hope you give Rover another shot in the future, but we understand if not. If you have any questions, please call us at ************ or email *******
All the best,Rover Support

Consumer Response: Hi Rover Team,

Thank you for the quick response. Given that the Rover Service is about putting Canine parents in touch with care givers and one of the key decision criteria that canine parents use when selecting a caregiver is how others rated their experience, not being able to accurately reflect such an experience does not hold to the spirit of the service. While we did not have this caregiver sit our canine, the resulting poor experience is not reflected because of the inability to leave feedback.

I believe a fair resolution would be, the simple ability to leave feedback and explicitly mention that we did not have the caregiver sit the dog. That way, it is reflective that the feedback is on the communication and how poorly the caregiver handle the communication and not the dog.

Complaint: ********

I am rejecting this response because:


******* *********

Business Response: Hi *******,

Thank you for your response. At this time, we're unable to allow leaving reviews without a stay first. We did pass along your suggestion to our product team, and they'll take it into account as they continue to improve the site.

Leaving feedback is a valuable part of the pet parent experience, and we appreciate your reaching out to share yours.

Rover Support

7/14/2015 Billing/Collection Issues | Read Complaint Details

Additional Notes

Complaint: I'm retired mom and my son signed me up with "" for sitting dog business because I love dogs and I had priced my service from May 18 to May 28, 2015 for 10 day and the people pay rover $250 for service and take $40 for there fee and should sent me $210 for my work but until now I did not received anything I been call three time June 6, June 17, June 23. They told me check in the mail, and I don't thing want to pay me, I hope with this information bbb can help avoid that happen to other dog lover

Desired Settlement: I thing should pay my service

Business Response: Thank you for reaching out. We're sorry to hear you had a negative experience with Rover. To follow up on our earlier conversation, we would love to help you get your money directly deposited into your bank account. Please let us know if you have any trouble getting the information you need. We're happy to help!

We're dedicated to helping our sitters grow their dog-sitting businesses, and your feedback helps us learn what we can do better. If you have any more questions, please reach out to us at ************ or *******

Consumer Response:  
Better Business Bureau:

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID ********, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me.


******** *** 

4/12/2015 Problems with Product/Service | Read Complaint Details

Additional Notes

Complaint: refunded someone the money after it says striced and they only wanted me to sit the dog while they was at work so I did and the owner lied and they refunded 50% when I pet sit the dog that's not fair when I pet sit the dog refund them half just because they lied and said they didn't leave them with us they did.

Desired Settlement: I want all the money back from the pet owner since we did do what they asked and no fees token out because of the issues.

Business Response: Hi ******,

Thank you for reaching out to us. We refund owners based on the cancellation policy the sitter has in place. Your strict cancellation policy states that:

A full refund is available to the owner if they cancel by 12:00 p.m. one week before the stay begins (12:00 p.m. is determined by the sitter's time zone). If the stay is cancelled later than 12:00 p.m. one week before the stay begins, a 50% refund is available to the owner for the first remaining seven days of the stay and a 100% refund is available for any additional days. The sitter receives the 50% cancellation fee collected from the owner minus any Rover fees.

The Rover fee is agreed upon at the time you first sign up, so unfortunately, we aren't able to refund that. However, I understand you were able to connect with our support team and come to a mutual agreement. I'm happy we were able to help. Please let us know if you have any further feedback you would like to share.



Consumer Response: (The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
No i set the dog for 1 day while he was at work so it doesnt matter maybe he didn't see whiole at work then i dont know but thats all what he wanted so that what i did.

Business Response:

Hi ******,

Our support team followed up with you on February 17, 2015 regarding the details of this stay. It's our understanding that you were paid in full for the daycare minus Rover fees and a charge for administering medication. I hope we've fully addressed your questions and concerns, but you can always reach out directly to our support team at ************ or ******* if you have any further questions.


The Rover Team

Consumer Response:  
Complaint: ********

I am rejecting this response because: i want a full refund with out rover fees token out because of the problem and io want you to talk to customer care about being nice and not rude to people.


****** *******

Consumer Response:  
Complaint: ********

I am rejecting this response because: they didn't call me or emailed me so give me all of the money that i earned 


****** *******

2/28/2015 Problems with Product/Service | Read Complaint Details

Additional Notes

Complaint: ive been doing very well then all of a sudden through just an minor oversight, rover deactivated my account!! I give THEM business and this is how I get treated!! I should just do my business elsewhere!!

Desired Settlement: I want them to reactivate my account and stop charging the ridiculous 15% fee! Is that really necessary?? 5% seems more like it!

Business Response: Hi **,

We appreciate your feedback. We were unable to find an account associated with the details provided. Without this information, we can't speak to the reasons why this account was deactivated.

The fee allows Rover to cover premium insurance for all booked stays, 24/7 emergency support, and regular promotion of sitter profiles. Although we aren't considering lowering our fee at this time, we're happy to pass your feedback along.

2/5/2015 Problems with Product/Service | Read Complaint Details

Additional Notes

Complaint: I have been trying to complete a simple job application for over a week -- for dog sitting (secondary enployment) services. The website can;t be found no matter what browser issues I may or may not have - the customer service people seem to think this is amusing. I am not amusyed,. I am computer saavy - am a paralegal in Midtown Manhhattan. I believe the website is a scam!! I have even tried to log-in from my primary job but can't. I am fed up.

Desired Settlement: DesiredSettlementID: Other (requires explanation) Explain why this should happen. I am not 14 years old - but I feeel like it.

Business Response: Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2015/01/20) */ ****, We apologize for the difficulties you've experienced while trying to complete your sitter application. We do our best to assist with technical issues, and we're sorry that we haven't been able to provide a solution for you. Though we searched, we were unable to identify when you received assistance from our support team. Please contact us at XXX-XXX-XXXX or ******* and we will do our best to assist with these technical issues. We're committed to helping our customers, and if you could provide a little more information, we'll work with you to identify why you weren't able to locate our website.

1/8/2015 Problems with Product/Service | Read Complaint Details

Additional Notes

Complaint: I signed up for and was excited to get started. I called, as my info was not being accepted. I needed to speak to someone for assistance and got the runaround. I reached ****** who listened to the issues that I have had for almost 5 months and yes, I was frustrated but not angry until he wrote me off. I called in September and now, still trying to get in...the system is not correctly working. I explained that I had to continuposly re-enter info and 4+ months later, I am again trying to get my background check done and it won't accept my info. He hemmed and hawed and then tried to give me another phone # to start over...getting rid of me. I made it clear I didn't want to start again. I asked for a warm call with him on the line and all I got was, "Ma'am, ma'am...!Then ***** (Supervisor?) took over, stating she heard the entire conversation...then she said she heard part, then only the end. She began calling me degrading names like abusive and hung up. I tried to call back-I just want to list my business and work. It should not take 4+ months. They blocked my phone # and today, I find, after receiving a wonderful testimonial, I have been removed from their database with no knowledge. boasts great service but I got abuse-fraud.

Desired Settlement: I want to be put back on the site. I want problems fixed. I want good service instead of a bunch of kids who feel empowered, berating me and costing me money. It's simple...give what they advertise.

Business Response: Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2014/12/12) */ Rover's customer calls are recorded for quality assurance and we have reviewed the conversations that took place with ***** on December 4th. ***** called and expressed that she was experiencing issues completing her profile on Rover. She was experiencing issues entering in her social security number to complete a background check. All background checks completed for Rover are done through First Advantage to ensure that our users privacy is protected. The agent she was speaking with offered the phone number to ***** ********** so ***** could get assistance to complete her background check. When the agent offered the phone number ***** refused to take the number. As *****'s call progressed, she became more and more escalated and frustrated. She was transferred to a supervisor who offered to assist with the issues that she was experiencing on the site. ***** was asked numerous times how we could help and support with the issue she called about. After offering to help and support, ***** was not willing to take the support we were offering and proceeded to call our agent names. As a policy, we do not allow our agents to sustain this type of language and requested that ***** continue all future support requests by email. ***** was not treated inappropriately or unprofessionally by any member of our team. This type of behavior is a pattern with ***** as this is not the first time that she was inappropriate with an agent trying to assist her. Based on *****'s inappropriate behavior and conduct with our agents we came to final conclusion to not list *****'s dog sitting services on our site. Communication is a large part of our site and community and we are not confident that ***** will be professional and respectful when interacting with other users on our platform. We stand by this decision and will not be reinstating *****'s account.

11/11/2014 Problems with Product/Service | Read Complaint Details

Additional Notes

Complaint: We left ****** and our other dog (**), in ****'s care because we were out of the country for nearly two weeks. **** contacted us the second week and told us she had taken a shower and left ****** out of his kennel (which we provided with many additional items to keep him safe and occupied when she couldn't be with him). While she was in the shower, ****** knocked over her purse and accessed ****'s prescription medication (inhaler). **** was concerned that he had ingested a large amount of this steroid so she contacted our vet at ******** ********. Apparently there was not a doctor available and they suggested that she take ****** to the emergency vet which she did. ******'s heart rate was almost double his normal rate and they had to keep him overnight. **** was asked to pay a deposit which she did and then came back the next day to pick ****** up once he was released and paid the difference. When we returned we had to also take ****** back in for a follow up appointment to learn that this could have been an even more tragic ending if he hadn't been treated right away. We left our dogs in the care of **** and provided her with everything she would need to keep them safe and out of harms way, including his kennel. We trusted **** to use the kennel to keep ****** safe when she was unable to watch him. He is a naturally active and curious puppy and should not be left unsecured access to anything that could harm him, as in this case, ****'s prescription medicine. We specifically brought the kennel we use for ****** at home to ****, to prevent such an incident. Additionally, **** stated in previous messages regarding this incident, that ****** was starting to chew on a shoe and a pillow which we think should have been a clear message to **** not to leave him outside the kennel unsupervised. We are thankful that ****** appears to be fine at this point but clearly this could have had a much more serious ending. We would respectfully question why the pet owner would be responsible for the deductible when **** was provided with everything required to keep our dogs safe. If ****** or ** had a medical problem while we were away, we, as the pet owners, would be responsible for the incurred costs. However, we paid for a service in good faith and left two healthy and happy dogs under ****'s care. We then received a message while on vacation that one of our pets was ill due solely to ****'s decision to leave ****** unsupervised and exposed to potentially harmful medication. **** has apologized and taken responsibility for this mistake and we feel very strongly that we should not be held financially responsible for any of the additional cost associated with this mistake including the deductible. We sincerely hope that we will be able to come to a mutually acceptable resolution. Now has repaid **** and we have been asked to pay for her mistake - in addition we have insurance and a program with ******** Hospital which would have covered this cost. We could have been disussing the death of our dog due to a negliant mistake from our dog sitter and even though she has taken complete responsibility now the company is refusing to do what is right.

Desired Settlement: Quite honestly, this experience has become increasingly problematic as it appears that now we are expected to characterize the facts to as they already know them to be able to satisfy their insurance company. As we understand the definition of negligence, it is the failure to behave with the level of care that someone of ordinary prudence would have exercised under the same circumstances. If we agree that is the definition, than yes, this resulted from a negligent act by ****. Having said that, we see this being resolved one of two ways. Either **** refunds the amount she was paid for ******'s care directly to us and we will pay the deductible or she can refund it to you with the same result. In either case, we are extremely frustrated and concerned not only by what happened to ****** while in ****'s care, but by the way this is now being handled.

Business Response: Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2014/11/06) */ Dear *****, First of all, thank you for reaching out and explaining this situation. There's nothing more important to us than the health and safety of Rover dogs. We're sorry to hear about your experience, and grateful that our pet insurance plan was in place to cover the majority of ******** expenses. Our insurance plan dictates that the deductible be the responsibility of the pet parentbut we understand your unique situation and we'd like to help further by waiving the cost of your deductible. Under these circumstances, we're able to supersede our insurance plan and incur the deductible cost ($250). We don't want you to shoulder any of the insurance costs associated with this incident. We will work directly with our insurance company to have this deductible paid on your behalf. There's no further action necessary for you. Thank you again for contacting us about this difficult situation. We're glad we were able to assist with this matter, and especially heartened to hear that ****** is doing well. If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to contact us. Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (2000, 7, 2014/11/10) */ (The consumer indicated he/she ACCEPTED the response from the business.) We know that there are more instances than not that would require the pet-parent to pay but as you stated this was a unique circumstance and I appreciate taking care of us as customers. It does make us feel much more inclined to use the service again. I am only disappointed that it took this complaint to fix this situation as we have had three other opportunities to board our dogs and have had to use other services because we weren't sure how this would turn out. We greatly appreciate your quick response and your understanding that this situation was not typical. Thank you for taking care of this and BBB.

9/23/2014 Advertising/Sales Issues | Read Complaint Details

Additional Notes

Complaint: Rover advertised on Facebook with a link to become a dog walker or pet sitter. You follow link electronically enter all information. Then I contacted the main customer service number to ask them the day I put in my electronic application and all personal and business info on there. Resume etc etc. SS# etc etc. I spoke with customer service and a supposed recruiter on the phone the day I started my rover page and application. The csr/recruiter advised that I didnt need a license or an EIN or anything to start as a dog walker. Nothing. However when reading according to VA state requirements different information posted and ********** ******* ****** advised me of different information. I was told I need a license to be a Walker DBA Rover or sitter as sole proprieter-even as an employee. On their website you had to check off if licensed bonded or other such options or certifications. I was told several phone calls no license as employee. I would just walk client dogs. Then told I had to get business or clients in Centreville. In other words I created page with rover. Paid for and passed background screen. Paid for Bond. Have to pay for business cards on their site eith their printer. POst tutorials which I did 2 from family. Had to post pics of my home pets I had -foster/owner etc. I did. I had to create a rover email and special URL code to offer discounts to get clients. I did and posted on facebook and twitter. I tried and URL invalid Email invalid. My face and all personal info on there. Costs of all flyers, cards, posting to webpages. Background check. Putting flyers up at local businesses. NO phone calls. NO contacts. No clients. I was told to then reduce my rates all of them to 30.00 for overnight sitting, puppies or adult dogs. Not competetive and with cost of living here. VA. ALso told many false information and mislead that I was employee so would receive paycheck. Then hourly rate I post on site for clients. Not so. Cost of gas, bond, flyers, cards, having to create sales to attract clientel, never told proper insurance, tax form or important business as employee information. Mislead to beleive they had a set number of cleints here and would walk dogs for a set fee competetive with others here in VA. NOt so. They hen proceeded to post on Twitter and when I tweeted my questions and concern with costs and no business. They private messaged me and said they would get back to me and never did. I had to call several times left on long holds. Bad customer service turnaround and bad information. Costed me time and money and no paycheck plus false advertisement of my name and invalid url codes and email address. Please advise thank you **** ******

Desired Settlement: Reimbursement of time to create page. Bad customer service turnaround. Twitter feed false advertisement and ussage of my name and time line. I helped them to get business. Cost me to join as a pet sitter dog walker and loss of any salary due to false and bad business advertisement and bad information. Plus my reputation on line. I got my bond, Pet first aid CPR class certificate. In process of getting insurance and when I can start my own business all paperwork in order to do so. I wanted to walk dogs while attending college and Mom to 2 elementary school children. Im very disappointed, upset and frustrated.

Business Response: Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2014/08/29) */ As a marketplace website, seeks to provide dog sitters with an outstanding website to help them advertise and run their pet-sitting businesses. We are always disappointed when a sitter has a confusing experience with our site. We assisted Ms. ****** with many aspects of using our site over the course of August 5 through August 19. Throughout this process, it became clear that Ms. ****** misunderstood the intention of the site and mistakenly believed that she was applying for employment. We made several attempts to clarify that our site is a marketplace website, as well as to help Ms. ****** improve her site profile to attract clients to her business. We also advised her that we require sitters to comply with their local laws and regulations. During especially busy periods, we apologized for long wait times and offered to schedule dedicated time to answer Ms. ******'s questions. On August 10, Ms. ****** asked Rover to help her remove her listing for her sitter services, which we did. Again, we are very sorry that Ms. ****** had a poor experience using We wish her the best in her pet-sitting business.

7/28/2014 Advertising/Sales Issues | Read Complaint Details

Additional Notes

Complaint: A Place For Rove, Inc. ( website continues to publish false, defamatory, and misleading information about myself and my services. In particular, the website states that "Sitter rarely sends photos" which is false. They have been told both verbally on 6/25/14 and in writing on 7/27/14 that their statements are false and damages my good reputation but they continue the false and misleading publication.

Desired Settlement: As of the time of this complaint I ask only an apology and they agree to cease making false statements which cast my good reputation in a poor light.

Business Response: Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2014/07/11) */ is a website where dog sitters can list their dog-sitting services and dog owners can search for a dog sitter. On June 25, Rover added a statistic to dog sitters' profiles listing the frequency with which dog sitters send photos to dog owners. We added this statistic in response to feedback from dog owners, to help provide dog owners with the information that they need to make a decision about hiring a dog sitter. The wording on this feature was initially imprecise, and therefore incorrect, as it did not specify that the sitter sent a photo through the site. We have now updated the language to be clear that the statistic describes the percent of stays (dog-sitting reservations) that include a dog-sitter's photo sent through the site. We have also made other improvements to the feature based on feedback from Mr. ****** and other sitters. For instance, because the feature is new, we have set the statistic to default to 100% on sitter profiles, and sitters will be evaluated on future services only. Mr. ******'s profile now shows: "100% of stays: Sitter sends photos through Rover on every stay." We have spoken and corresponded via email with Mr. ****** several times to listen to his feedback and apologize for his experience. We look forward to continuing the conversation.

9/25/2013 Problems with Product/Service | Read Complaint Details

Additional Notes

Complaint: I had an email from ***** with regarding an "emergency" need for a dog sitter. I responded promptly via email and the dog owner contacted me and brought the dog to my house the next day. It was a day earlier that the time that ***** had told me, so I called her during the time I was sitting the dog and told her that their system on the computer didn't allow me to put the actual date that dog sitting started. (She was unable to correct it.) After the dog owner picked up her dog (Tali) on Sunday evening the owner asked me how she was supposed to pay me. I informed her that it had to go through (so that I was in compliance with their rules). It has been over 2 weeks now and I have not been paid. I have called a couple times and emailed and was told that they have been unable to reach ***** ***** at either of her numbers and they asked ME to attempt to reach her. I have called SEVERAL times (performing collection services now) and have also been unsuccessful. I do not believe that I should be performing their collection services. And, further, I believe that since ***** is the one who bypassed their program/system that they have in place, that should honor my fees and pay me for the services that I rendered in good faith, for someone who had an "emergency". I did everything that I was able to do - through their system and even notified them that I did, but was only able to do so much, since the dog owner hadn't signed in. I feel like I have been completely scammed by Not only should I be paid for the services that I performed, but I should ALSO be given a substantial credit for all of this time it is taking to try to remedy this problem. I didn't sign up to be a collection service. And, I was not informed that the pet owner didn't already pay their system, so that I could be paid PRIOR to taking care of the "emergency dog care" situation. I was working in good faith, but obviously is/was not!!!

Desired Settlement: I want to be paid for my services rendered. I dog sat for three full days, and I believe I should be paid for those three days. ($50 x 3 = $150.00) In addition, if they are a reputable company, they should be addressing this inconvenience to me and pay me extra (as a credit on my account or SOMETHING) because I am NOT a collection service company!!! This entire situation is NOT my fault and I really resent them leaving a voice mail informing me that "because the dog owner did not register on-line, they will not be able to pay me". THAT is NOT my problem!!!

Business Response: Initial Business Response /* (1000, 7, 2013/09/13) */ We are devastated to hear that any user of Rover has had a negative experience, and we continue to work with ***** ******** to resolve this situation. There are four important factors in this situation: 1) No reservation or booking was ever made with Rover in regards to the incident in question. Engaging in a sitting without the stay being booked through Rover is against the terms of service accepted by all members. Rover regularly reminds members of this policy, which is in place to specifically avoid these types of incidents and disputes. Paying through the site prior to taking custody of a dog provides both the sitter and owner with protections; 2) Despite repeated attempts, we have been unable to reach the owner in question to determine whether a sitting took place and whether the owner was satisfied with the service; 3) Because of our commitment to our customers, and our genuine desire to make things right, we have offered to compensate ***** for her time and feedback. Our compensation to date has exceeded the payment that ***** would have received from the owner; 4) When ***** contacted Rover after taking custody of the dog without a reservation or booking, we offered to assist her in contacting the owner at that time, but she declined this offer. These circumstances in no way diminish our grief over hearing *****'s continued frustration. We will honor the offer we have made her and will continue to attempt to engage the owner. More details are included below. We have carefully reviewed all records of our communication with ***** and the owner. All calls to our call center are logged and recorded and all emails or other contact are tagged with the customer's name and contact information. Our records show that our customer experience team assisted the owner in using the website to follow the normal process of messaging dog sitters and requesting dog-sitting services. Several sitters, including *****, responded to the owner's requests, but the Rover customer experience team was not involved in making plans for ***** to take custody of the dog. On Aug 12 we received a call from ***** telling us that she was currently sitting the owner's dog. Since the booking was not completed in our system, we offered to contact the owner and help the owner confirm the booking and payment at that time. ***** suggested that we wait a few days and asserted that she would follow up with the owner at pickup time. During this call ***** also declined to adjust the dates of the original request, which was for two nights at a price of $50 / night-$100 total-because the stay began one night early as a result of construction near *****'s home. After Aug 12, neither ***** nor our customer experience team have been able to reach the owner despite multiple, regular attempts. On August 27, in accordance with our policies regarding probable stays in which an owner has not paid, we offered ***** the maximum concession of $50, as well as a reimbursement of her subscription to Rover's Protection Package, a $49.95 value, for a total compensation of $99.95. If ***** had instead received the owner's payment for the stay, she would have received $85-the $100 price of the stay less Rover's 15% fee of $15. Through Rover's compensation, ***** received $14.95 more in value than she would have received in payment from the owner. Additionally, we want to be very clear that does not receive any revenue unless sitters such as ***** are paid through our site. Consequently, the assertion that Rover participated in a "scam" is incorrect. As a result of this transaction, Rover has lost the profit that we would have received if the members had followed the terms of service, as well as the additional $99.95 of concessions provided to *****. We continue to assist ***** in her communication with the owner, and we would greatly appreciate her continued feedback about opportunities for improving the website. Description of the company: is a website that matches pet owners with pet sitters. Independent pet sitters apply to list their services on the website. These independent sitters provide profile information and determine their own price per night. Dog owners search the site to find pet sitters. Dog owners communicate with the sitters and pay for sitting through the site. collects a commission fee from all transactions, in a similar model as eBay or Amazon Marketplace. Final Consumer Response /* (2000, 12, 2013/09/25) */ 9/24/2013 I was contacted by that the person who didn't pay has finally paid AND left me a $50 tip for the inconvenience.